Occupational therapists' reflection on practice within psychiatric care: A Delphi study

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 151-159

  Wikeby, Maria ^a   Lundgren Pierre, Birgitta ^a   Archenholtz, Birgitha ^a,b  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical reasoning; Delphi; Occupational therapy; Psychiatric care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPETENCE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LEISURE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MOTIVATION; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST ATTITUDE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SWEDEN; SYMPTOM; THEORY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33747443521     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: 16512014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11038120500380570     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kinsella, E A. (2001) Reflections on practice Can J Occup Ther 68, pp. 195-8.
2. Etisk kod (Code of ethics for Occupational therapists). Nacka: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter; 2005.
3. Kvalitetspolicy: Grunden för en ständig förbättring av den arbetsterapeutiska verksamheten (Quality policy: The foundation of ongoing improvements). Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter; 2004.
4. Björklund, A. (1994) Occupational therapist: A cameleon in light of paradigms Scand J Occup Ther, 1, pp. 59-68.
5. Cottrell, RF. (1990) Perceived competence among occupational therapists in mental health Am J Occup Ther, 44, pp. 118-24.
6. Haglund, L and Ekblad, E and Thorell, LH and Rahm Hallberg, I. (2000) Practice models in Swedish psychiatric occupational therapy Scand J Occup Ther, 7, pp. 107-13.
7. Paul, S. (1990) Mental health: An endangered occupational therapist in mental health Am J Occup Ther, 44, pp. 118-124.
8. Stokebrand, KS and Blackman, KA and Madigan, MJ and Cash, SH. (1996) Can we influence practice preference? Examining the factors and seeking solutions Am J Occup Ther, 50, pp. 152-3.
9. Wood, W. (1996) Legitimizing occupational therapy's knowledge Am J Occup Ther, 50, pp. 626-34.
10. Kasar, J and Muscari, M E. (1999) A conceptual model for the development of professional behaviours in occupational therapists Can J Occup Ther, 67, pp. 42-50.
11. Cottrell, RF. (2000) COTA to OTR: Factors influencing professional development Am J Occup Ther, 54, pp. 413-420.
12. Bossers, A and Kernaghan, J and Hodgis, L and Merla, L and O'Connor, C and Van Kessel, M. (1999) Defining and developing professionalism Can J Occup Ther, 66, pp. 116-21.
13. Townsend, E. (2003) Reflections on power and justice in enabling occupation Can J Occup Ther, 70, pp. 74-87.
14. Pelland, MJ. (1987) A conceptual model for the instruction and supervision of treatment planning Am J Occup Ther, 41, pp. 351-9.
15. Krefting, LH. (1985) The use of conceptual models in clinical practice Can J Occup Ther, 52, pp. 173-8.
16. Kortman, B. (1993) The eye of the beholder: Models in occupational therapy Aust Occup Ther, 47, pp. 115-22.
17. Parham, D. (1987) Towards professionalism: The reflective therapist Am J Occup Ther, 41, pp. 555-61.
18. Townsend, E.(1997) Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Ontario: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
19. Lundgren Pierre, B. (2001) Occupational therapy as documented in patients' records, Part III: Valued but not documented. Underground practice in the context of professional written communication Scand J Occup Ther, 8, pp. 174-83.
20. Björklund, A.(2000) On the structure and contents of occupational therapists' paradigms. Dissertation. Stockholm: Karolinska institutet.
21. Kielhofner, G.(1995) Conceptual foundation of occupational therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
22. Kielhofner, G and Burke, J. (1977) Occupational therapy after 60 years Am J Occup Ther, 31, pp. 675-8.
23. Kielhofner, G.(2002) A model of human occupation: Theory and application 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
24. Miltner RS. Identifying labor support actions of intrapartum nurses. J obstet Gynecol Neonatals Nuvs. 2000;29:491-9. Jognn Clinical Studies 2000.
25. McKenna HP. The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing? J Adv Nurs 1994;1221-5.
26. Goodman, CM. (1987) The Delphi technique: A critique J Adv Nurs, 12, pp. 729-34.
27. Greatorex, J and Dexter, T. (2000) An accessible analytical approach for investigating what happens between the rounds of a Delphi study J Adv Nurs, 32, pp. 1016-24.
28. Lieff, S and Clarke, D. (2000) What factors contribute to senior psychiatry residents' interest in geriatric psychiatry: A Delphi study Can J Psychiatry, 45:12, pp. 912-16.
29. Patton, MQ.(2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods 3rd ed. Newbury Park CA: Sage.
30. Miles, MB and Huberman, AM.(1994) Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
31. Svensson, E. (2001) Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires J Rehab Med, 33, pp. 47-48.
32. Mary, E and Hurley, R.(1986) Nursing diagnosis: Validation. The sixth conference. St Louis MO: C.V. Mosby.
33. Lundgren Pierre, B and Sonn, U. (1999) Occupational therapy as documented in patients' records, Part II: What is proper documentation? Contradictions and aspects of concern from the perspective of occupational therapists Scand J Occup Ther, 6, pp. 3-10.
34. Borell L. Arbetsterapi ur ett aktivitetsperspektiv (Occupational therapy from an occupational perspective). Socialmedicinsk tidskrift 1993;7-8.
35. Bernspång, B. (1996) Sysslor något för arbetsterapeuter? (Senior lecturer speech: Occupations: Something for occupational therapists?) Arbetsterapeuten, (15), pp. 10-12.
36. Polatajko, HJ. (1994) Dreams, dilemmas and decisions for occupational therapy practice in a new millennium: A Canadian perspective Am J Occup Ther, 48, pp. 590-4.
37. Stenbeck, B and Eklund, M and Rahm Hallberg, I. (2001) The domain of concern of Swedish occupational therapists working in psychiatric care Scand J Occup Ther, 8, pp. 184-92.
38. Bruhn, JG. (1991) Occupational therapy in 21st century: An outsider's view Am J Occup Ther, 45, pp. 775-85.
39. Sadhra, S and Beach, JR and Aw, TC and Sheikh-Ahmed, K. (2001) Occupational health research priorities in Malaysia: A Delphi study Occup Environ Med, 58, pp. 426-31.
40. Van Steenkiste, BC and Jacobs, JE and Verheijen, NM and Levelink, JH and Bottema, BJAM. (2002) A Delphi technique as a method for selecting the content of an electronic patient for asthma Int J Med Inform, 65, pp. 7-16.
41. Flink, A and Kosecoff, J and Chassin, M and Brook, RH. (1987) Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use Am J Public Health, 74, pp. 979-83.
42. Williams, PL and Webb, C. (1994) The Delphi technique: A methodological discussion J Adv Nurs, 19, pp. 180-6.
43. Sagreus, V.(1994) Var står vi nu? (Where are we now?). Rapport nr. Stockholm: Statens institutionsbyrå SIS.
44. Brorsson, B and Wall, S.(1984) Syntesmetoder;värdering av medicinsk teknologi;problem och metoder (Synthesis methods: Evaluation of medicine technology; problems and methods) Stockholm: Medicinska forskningsrådet.
45. Nordlund, O and Rönnberg, S.(1984) Frågeformulår;att forska i utbildning, vård och samhälle;en introduktion (Questionnaire: Research in education, caring and society; an introduction). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
46. Moreno-Casbas, T. (2001) Identification of priorities for nursing research in Spain: A Delphi study J Adv Nurs, 35, pp. 857-63.
47. Hansson, F and Keeney, S and McKenna, H. (2000) Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique J Adv Nurs, 32, pp. 1008-15.