The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Cementation on the Retention of Different Types of Fiber Post in Canals Obturated Using a Eugenol Sealer

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 882-885

  Vano, Michele ^a,b   Cury, Alvaro H ^a   Goracci, Cecilia ^a   Chieffi, Nicoletta ^a   Gabriele, Mario ^b   Tay, Franklin R ^a,c   Ferrari, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Eugenol sealer; fiber post; push out bond testing

Indexed keywords

ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL OBTURATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 33747367003     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.025     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A., and Hanson E.C. Retention of endodontic dowels. effect of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 39 (1978) 401-405
2. Schwartz R.S., and Robbins J.W. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth. a literature review. J Endod 30 (2004) 289-301
3. Galen W.W., and Mueller K.I. Restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. In: Cohen S., and Burns R.S. (Eds). Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed (1998), Mosby, St. Louis 691-717
4. Saunders E.M., Saunders W.P., and Rashid M.Y. The effect of post preparation on the apical seal of root fillings using chemically adhesive materials. Int Endod J 24 (1991) 51-57
5. Hagge M.S., Wong R.D., and Lindemuth J.S. Retention of posts luted with phosphate monomer-based composite cement in canals obturated using a eugenol sealer. Am J Dent 15 (2002) 378-382
6. Mickel A.K., and Wright E.R. Growth inhibition of Strreptococcus anginosus (milleri) by three calcium hydroxide sealers and one zinc oxide-eugenol sealer. J Endod 25 (1999) 34-37
7. Tjan A., and Nemetz H. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricatedposts luted with an adhesive composite resin cement. Quintessence Int 22 (1992) 839-844
8. Ngoh E.C., Pashley D.H., Loushine R.J., Weller R.N., and Kimbrough W.F. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin. J Endod 27 (2001) 411-414
9. Schwartz R.S., Murchison D.F., and Walker W.A. Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention. J Endod 24 (1998) 564-567
10. Allan N.A., Walton R.C., and Schaeffer M.A. Setting times for endodontic sealers under clinical usage and in vitro conditions. J Endod 27 (2001) 421-423
11. McComb D., and Smith D. Comparison of physical properties of polycarboxylate-based and conventional root canal sealers. J Endod 2 (1976) 228-234
12. Ørstavik D., Nordahl I., and Tibballs J.E. Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 512-519
13. Caicedo R., and von Fraunhofer J. The properties of endodontic sealer cements. J Endod 14 (1988) 527-533
14. Bourgeois R.S., and Lemon R.R. Dowel space preparation and apical leakage. J Endod 7 (1981) 66-69
15. Madison S., and Zakariasen K.L. Linear and volumetric analysis of apical leakage in teeth prepared for posts. J Endod 10 (1984) 422-427
16. Abramovitz I., Tagger M., Tamse A., and Metzger Z. The effect of immediate vs. delayed post space preparation on the apical seal of a root canal filling. a study in an increased-sensitivity pressure-driven system. J Endod 26 (2000) 435-439
17. Kwan E.H., and Harrington G.W. The effect of immediate post preparation on apical seal. J Endod 7 (1981) 325-329
18. Fan B., Wu M.K., and Wesselink P.R. Coronal leakage along apical root fillings after immediate and delayed post space preparation. Endod Dent Traumatol 15 (1999) 124-126
19. Solano F., Hartwell G., and Appelstein C. Comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation using AH plus sealer. J Endod 31 (2005) 752-754
20. Boone K.J., Murchison D.F., Schindler W.G., and Walker W.A. Post retention. the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time and different sealers. J Endod 27 (2001) 768-771
21. Abramovitz L., Lev R., Fuss Z., and Metzger Z. The unpredictability of seal after post space preparation. a fluid transport study. J Endod 27 (2001) 292-295
22. Ferrari M., Vichi A., and Grandini S. Influence of adhesive application technique on efficacy of bonding to root canal walls. an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 422-429
23. Goracci C., Tavares A.U., Fabianelli A., et al. The adhesion between fiber posts and root canal walls. comparison between microtensile and push-out bond strength measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 112 (2004) 353-361
24. Goracci C., Fabianelli A., Sadek F.T., Papacchini F., Tay F.R., and Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 31 (2005) 608-612
25. Gesi A., Raffaelli O., Goracci C., Pashley D.H., Tay F.R., and Ferrari M. Interfacial strength of Resilon and gutta-percha to intraradicular dentin. J Endod 31 (2005) 909-913
26. Rosenstiel S.F., and Gegauff A.G. Effect of provisional cementing agents on provisional resins. J Prosthet Dent 59 (1988) 29-33
27. Monticelli F., Osorio R., Albaladejo A., et al. Effects of adhesive systems and luting agents on bonding of fiber posts to root canal dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77 (2006) 195-200
28. Vano M., Goracci C., Monticelli F., et al. The adhesion between fibre post and composite resin cores. the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various post surface chemical treatments to posts. Int Endod J 39 (2006) 31-39