Retention of posts luted with phosphate monomer-based composite cement in canals obturated using a eugenol sealer

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 378-382

  Hagge, Mark S ^a   Wong, Ralan D M ^a   Lindemuth, James S ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b Lackland Air Force Base ^*  (United States)

^c DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KERR PULP CANAL SEALER; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; ZINC OXIDE EUGENOL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; ZINC OXIDE-EUGENOL CEMENT;

EID: 0038317925     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Goldman M, De Vitre R, Pier M. Effect of the dentin smear layer on tensile strength of cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52:485-488.
2. nd ed. Chicago, Quintessence, 2001; 550-551.
3. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis, CV Mosby; 2001. 765-781.
4. Boone KJ, Murchison, DF, Schindler WG, et al. Post retention: the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time and different sealers. J Endod2001;27:768-71
5. Ganss C, Jung M. Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cements on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 1998; 23: 55-62.
6. al-Wazzan KA, al-Harbi AA, Hammad IA. The effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on the bond strength of two resin composite core materials to dentin. J Prosthodont 1997; 6: 37-42.
7. Paul SJ, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:8-14.
8. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin-bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95: 516-520.
9. th ed. Hamnilton, Ontario, Canada, BC Decker; 2002. 69-70.
10. Schwartz RS, Davis RD, Hilton TJ. Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of a resin cement. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 147-150.
11. Woody TL, Davis RD. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 175-180.
12. Schwartz RS, Murchison DF, Walker WA III. Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention. J Endod 1998; 24: 564-567.
13. Russo EMA, Russo E, Carvalho RCR, et al. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of posts. J Dent Res 1999;78:389 (Abstr 2271).
14. Burns DR, Moon PC, Webster NP, et al. Effect of endodontic sealers on dowels luted with resin cement. J Prosthodont 2000; 9: 137-141.
15. Adamian S, Difenderfer KE, Johnson JD. Effects of residual eugenol from root canal sealers on retention of resin bonded posts. J Endod 2001; 27: 228 (Abstr 56).
16. Bergeron BE, Murchison DF, Schindler WG, et al. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal. J Endod 2001; 27: 13-17.
17. Hagge MS, Wong RDM, Lindemuth JS. Effect of three root canal sealers on the retentive strength of endodontic posts luted with resin cement. Int Endod J 2002;35:337-343.
18. Hume WR. In vitro studies on the local pharmacodynamics, pharmacology and toxicology of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. Int Endod J 1988; 21:130-134.
19. Love RM, Purton DG. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements. J Dent 1998; 26: 599-602.
20. Stockton LW, Williams PT, Clarke CT. Post retention and post/core shear bond strength of four post systems. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 441-447.
21. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, et al. Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin. Gen Dent 2000; 48: 320-324.
22. Paschal JE Jr., Burgess JO, Robbins JW. Post retention with and without root canal fillers. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 412 (Abstr 3190).
23. Assif D, Bleicher S. Retention of serrated endodontic posts with a composite luting agent: Effect of film thickness. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56: 689-691.
24. Chan FW, Harcourt JK, Brockhurst PJ. The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Aust Dent J 1993; 38: 39-15.
25. Hagge MS, Wong RDM, Lindemuth JS: Effect of dowel space preparation and composite cement thickness on retention of a prefabricated dowel. J Prosthodont 2002;11:19-24.