Spatial interaction model of spillovers from locally provided public services

Regional Studies

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 631-644

  Lundberg, Johan ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Externalities; Local public expenditures; Spatial econometrics

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; ECONOMETRICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PUBLIC SERVICE; SPILLOVER EFFECT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 33747310620     PISSN: 00343404     EISSN: 13600591     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00343400600868788     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anselin, L. (1988) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2. Anselin, L. (2000) Spatial econometrics. In A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics. (pp. 310-330). Malden MA: Basil Blackwell.
3. Anselin, L. and Bera, A. (1998) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In Handbook of Applied Economic Statistics. (pp. 237-289). New York NY: Dekker.
4. Anselin, L. and Rey, S. (1991) Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models Geographical Analysis, 23, pp. 110-131.
5. Anselin, L. and Bera, A. and Florax, R. and Yoon, M. (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26, pp. 77-104.
6. Baicker, K. (2005) The spillover effects of state spending Journal of Public Economics, 89, pp. 529-544.
7. Benirschka, M. and Binkley, J. (1994) Land price volatility in a geographically dispersed market American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, pp. 185-195.
8. Bergstrom, T. and Goodman, R. (1973) Private demands for public goods American Economic Review, 63, pp. 280-296.
9. Besley, T. and Case, A. (1995) Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition American Economic Review, 85, pp. 25-45.
10. Bivand, R. and Szymanski, S. (1997) Spatial dependence through local yardstick competition: Theory and testing Economics Letters, 55, pp. 257-265.
11. Bivand, R. and Szymanski, S. (2000) Modeling the spatial impact of the introduction of compulsory competitive tendering Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30, pp. 203-219.
12. Borcherding, T. and Deacon, R. (1972) The demand for services of non-federal governments American Economic Review, 62, pp. 891-901.
13. Brett, C. and Pinkse, J. (1997) Those taxes are all over the map: A test for spatial dependence of municipal tax rates in British Columbia International Regional Science Review, 20, pp. 131-151.
14. Brueckner, J. (1998) Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls Journal of Urban Economics, 44, pp. 438-467.
15. Brueckner, J. (2003) Strategic interaction among governments: An overview of empirical studies International Regional Science Review, 26, pp. 175-188.
16. Brueckner, J. and Saavedra, L. (2001) Do local governments engage in strategic tax competition? National Tax Journal, 54, pp. 203-229.
17. Case, A. and Rosen, H. and Hines, J. (1993) Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the States Journal of Public Economics, 52, pp. 285-307.
18. De Graaff, T. and Florax, R. and Nijkamp, P. and Reggiani, A. (2001) A general misspecification test for spatial regression models: heteroskedasticity, dependence and nonlinearity Journal of Regional Science, 41, pp. 255-276.
19. Elhorst, J. (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models International Regional Science Review, 26, pp. 244-268.
20. Florax, R. and Folmer, H. (1992) Specification and estimation of spatial linear regression models Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, pp. 405-432.
21. Florax, R. and Folmer, H. and Rey, S. (2003) Specification searches in spatial econometrics: The relevance of Hendry's methodology Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, pp. 557-579.
22. Florax, R. and Van der Vlist, A. (2003) Spatial econometric data analysis: Moving beyond traditional models International Regional Science Review, 26, pp. 223-243.
23. Greene, W. (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th Edn. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Hanes, N. (2002) Spatial spillover effects in the Swedish local rescue services Regional Studies, 36, pp. 531-539.
25. Holtz-Eakin, D. (1994) Public-sector capital and the productivity puzzle Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, pp. 12-21.
26. Le Sarge, P. (1993) Spatial modeling of agricultural markets American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, pp. 1211-1216.
27. Murdoch, J. and Rahmatian, M. and Thayer, M. (1993) A spatially autoregressive median voter model of recreation expenditures Public Finance Quarterly, 21, pp. 334-350.
28. Murdoch, J. and Sandler, T. and Hansen, L. (1991) An econometric technique for comparing median voter and oligarchy choice models of collective action: The case of NATO alliance Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, pp. 624-631.
29. Murdoch, J. and Sandler, T. and Sargent, K. (1997) A tale of two collectives: Sulfur versus nitrogen oxides emission reduction in Europe Economica, 64, pp. 281-301.
30. Nationalencyklopedin. (1995).
31. Revelli, F. (2002) Local taxes, national politics and spatial interactions in English district election results European Journal of Political Economy, 18, pp. 281-299.
32. Thorsen, I. and Ubøe, J. and Nævdal, G. (1999) A network approach to commuting Journal of Regional Science, 39, pp. 73-101.
33. Zellner, A. (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests of aggregation bias Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57, pp. 348-368.