Dynamic response of Earth's magnetosphere to By reversals

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 108, Issue A3, 2003, Pages

  Kabin, K ^a   Rankin, R ^a   Marchand, R ^a   Gombosi, T I ^b   Clauer, C R ^b   Ridley, A J ^b   Papitashvili, V O ^b   DeZeeuw, D L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Earth's magnetosphere; Global MHD modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747151128     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002JA009480     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amm, O., Comment on "A three-dimensional, iterative, mapping procedure for the implementation of an ionosphere-magnetosphere anisotropic Ohm's law boundary condition in global magnetohydrodynamic simulations" by Michael Goodman, Ann. Geophys., 14, 773-774, 1996.
2. Bargatze, L. F., D. N. Baker, R. L. McPherron, and E. W. Hones, Magnetospheric impulse response to many levels of geomagnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 6387-6394, 1985.
3. Clauer, C. R., and E. Friis-Christensen, High-latitude dayside electric field and currents during strong northward interplanetary magnetic field: Observations and model calculations, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 2749-2757, 1988.
4. Collier, M. R., J. A. Slavin, R. P. Lepping, A. Szabo, and K. Ogilvie, Timing accuracy for the simple planar propagation of magnetic field structures in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2509-2512, 1998.
5. Cowley, S. W. H., Magnetospheric asymmetries associated with the Y-component of the IMF, Planet. Space Sci., 29, 79-96, 1981.
6. DeZeeuw, D. L., T. I. Gombosi, C. P. T. Groth, K. G. Powell, and Q. F. Stout, An adaptive MHD method for global space weather simulations, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 28, 1956-1965, 2000.
7. y changes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2601-2604, 1998.
8. Friis-Christensen, E., Y. Kamide, A. D. Richmond, and S. Matsushita, Interplanetary magnetic field control of high-latitude electric fields and currents determined from Greenland magnetometer chain, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 1325-1338, 1985.
9. Gombosi, T. I., D. L. DeZeeuw, C. P. T. Groth, and K. G. Powell, Magnetospheric configuration for Parker-spiral IMF conditions: Results of a 3D MHD simulation, Adv. Space Res., 26, 139-149, 2000a.
10. Gombosi, T. I., K. G. Powell, and B. vanLeer, Comment on "Modeling the magnetosphere for northward interplanetary magnetic field: Effects of electrical resistivity" by Joachim Raeder, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 13,141-13,147, 2000b.
11. Gombosi, T. I., G. Tóth, D. L. DeZeeuw, K. C. Hansen, K. Kabin, and K. G. Powell, Semirelativistic magnetohydrodynamcs and physics-based convergence acceleration, J. Comput. Phys., 177, 176-205, 2002.
12. Goodman, M. L., A three-dimensional, iterative, mapping procedure for the implementation of an ionosphere-magnetosphere anisotropic Ohm's law boundary condition in global magnetohydrodynamic simulations, Ann. Geophys., 13, 843-853, 1995.
13. Hairston, M. R., and R. A. Heelis, Response time of the polar ionospheric convection pattern to changes in the north-south direction of the IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 631-634, 1995.
14. Khan, H., and S. W. H. Cowley, Observations of the response time of high-latitude ionospheric convection to variations in the interplanetary magnetic field using EISCAT and IMP-8 data, Ann. Geophys., 17, 1306-1335, 1999.
15. Landau, L. D., and E. M. Lifshitz, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, Pergamon, New York, 1984.
16. Lockwood, M., and S. W. H. Cowley, Comment on "A statistical study of the ionospheric convection response to changing interplanetary magnetic field conditions using the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics technique" by A. J. Ridley et al., J. Geophys. Res., 104, 4387-4391, 1999.
17. Lu, G., S. W. H. Cowley, S. E. Milan, D. G. Sibeck, R. A. Greenwald, and T. Moretto, Solar wind effects on ionospheric convection: A review, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 64, 145-157, 2002.
18. Maynard, N. C., et al., Response of ionospheric convection to changes in the interplanetary magnetic field: Lessons from a MHD simulation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 21,429-21,451, 2001.
19. Murr, D. L., and W. J. Hughes, Reconfiguration timescales of ionospheric convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2145-2148, 2001.
20. Papitashvili, V. O., B. A. Belov, D. S. Faermark, S. A. Golyshev, L. Gromova, and A. E. Levitin, Electric potential patterns in the northern and southern polar regions parameterized by the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 13,251-13,262, 1994.
21. Powell, K. G., P. L. Roe, T. J. Linde, T. I. Gombosi, and D. L. DeZeeuw, A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys., 154, 284-309, 1999.
22. Ridley, A. J., Estimation of the uncertainty in timing the relationship between magnetospheric and solar wind processes, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 62, 757-771, 2000.
23. Ridley, A. J., and C. R. Clauer, Characterization of the dynamic variations of the dayside high-latitude ionospheric convection reversal boundary and relation to interplanetary magnetic field orientation, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 10,919-10,938, 1996.
24. Ridley, A. J., G. Lu, C. R. Clauer, and V. O. Papitashvili, A statistical study of the ionospheric convection response to changing interplanetary magnetic field conditions using the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics technique, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4023-4039, 1998.
25. Ridley, A. J., G. Lu, C. R. Clauer, and V. O. Papitashvili, Reply, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 4393-4396, 1999.
26. Ridley, A. J., G. Crowley, and C. Freitas, An empirical model of the ionospheric electric potential, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3675-3678, 2000.
27. Ridley, A. J., D. L. DeZeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, and K. G. Powell, Using steady-state MHD results to predict the global state of the magnetosphere- ionosphere system, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 30,067-30,076, 2001.
28. Ridley, A. J., K. C. Hansen, G. Tóth, D. L. DeZeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, and K. G. Powell, University of Michigan MHD results of the GGCM metrics challenge, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A10), 1290, doi:10.1029/ 2001JA000253, 2002.
29. Rostoker, G., D. Savoie, and T. D. Phan, Response of magnetosphere- ionosphere current systems to changes in the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 8633-8641, 1988.
30. Ruohoniemi, J. M., and R. A. Greenwald, Statistical patterns of the high-latitude convections obtained from Goose Bay HF radar observations, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21,743-21,763, 1996.
31. Ruohoniemi, J. M., and R. A. Greenwald, The response of high-latitude convection to a sudden southward IMF turning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2913-2916, 1998.
32. Ruohoniemi, J. M., S. G. Shepherd, and R. A. Greenwald, The response of high-latitude ionosphere to IMF variations, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 64, 159-171, 2002.
33. Saunders, M. A., M. P. Freeman, D. J. Southwood, S. W. H. Cowley, M. Lockwood, J. C. Samson, C. J. Farrugia, and T. J. Hughes, Dayside ionospheric convection changes in response to long-period interplanetary magnetic field oscillations: Determination of the ionospheric phase velocity, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19,373-19,380, 1992.
34. Shepherd, S. G., R. A. Greenwald, and J. M. Ruohoniemi, A possible explanation for rapid, larger-scale ionospheric responses to southward turnings of the IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3197-3200, 1999.
35. Slinker, S. P., J. A. Fedder, W. J. Hughes, and J. G. Lyon, Response of the ionosphere to a density pulse in the solar wind: Simulation of traveling convection vortices, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3549-3552, 1999.
36. Slinker, S. P., J. A. Fedder, J. M. Ruohoniemi, and J. G. Lyon, Global MHD simulation of the magnetosphere for November 24, 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 106,361-380, 2001.
37. Song, P., and C. T. Russell, Time series data analyses in space physics, Space Sci. Rev., 87, 387-463, 1999.
38. Song, P., D. L. DeZeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, C. P. T. Groth, and K. G. Powell, A numerical study of solar wind-magnetosphere interaction for northward IMF, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 28,361-28,378, 1999.
39. Song, P., D. L. DeZeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, J. U. Kozyra, and K. G. Powell, Global MHD simulations for southward IMF: A pair of wings in the flanks, Adv. Space Res., 28, 1763-1771, 2001.
40. y, and auroral effects on high-latitude ionospheric convection patterns, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 24,505-24,516, 2001.
41. Todd, H., S. W. H. Cowley, M. Lockwood, D. M. Willis, and H. Lühr, Response time of the high-latitude dayside ionosphere to sudden changes in the north-south component of the IMF, Planet. Space Sci., 36, 1415-1428, 1988.
42. Valdivia, J. A., D. Vassiliadis, A. Klimas, and A. S. Sharma, Modeling the spatial structure of the high latitude magnetic perturbations and the related current systems, Phys. Plasmas, 6, 4185-4194, 1999.
43. Weimer, D. R., Models of high-latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19,595-19,607, 1995.
44. Weimer, D. R., A flexible, IMF dependent model of high-latitude electric potential having "space weather" applications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2549-2552, 1996.
45. Weimer, D. R., An improved model of ionospheric electric potentials including substorm perturbations and application to the Geospace Environment Modeling November 24, 1996, event, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 407-416, 2001.