An improved model of ionospheric electric potentials including substorm perturbations and application to the geospace environment modeling november 24, 1996, event

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 106, Issue A1, 2001, Pages 407-416

  Weimer, D R ^a  

^a MISSION RESEARCH CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868576799     PISSN: 21699380     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2000JA000604     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baker, D. N., A. J. Klimas, D. Vassiliadis, T. I. Pulkkinen, R. L. McPherron, Reexamination of driven and unloading aspects of magnetospheric substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 7169, 1997.
2. Burke, W. J., T. L. Fehringer, D. R. Weimer, C. Y. Huang, M. S. Gussenhoven, F. J. Rich, L. C. Gentile, Observed and predicted potential distributions during the October 1995 magnetic cloud passage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3023, 1998.
3. Burke, W. J., D. R. Weimer, N. C. Maynard, Geoeffective interplanetary scale sizes derived from regression analysis of polar cap potentials, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 9989, 1999.
4. Collier, M. R., J. A. Slavin, R. P. Lepping, A. Szabo, K. Ogilvie, Timing accuracy for the simple planar propagation of magnetic field structures in the solar wind, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2509, 1998.
5. Foster, J. C., J. M. Holt, R. C. Musgrove, D. S. Evans, Ionospheric convection associated with discrete levels of particle precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 13, 656, 1986.
6. Hairston, M. R., R. A. Heelis, Response time of the polar ionosphere convection pattern to changes in the north‐south direction of the IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 631, 1995.
7. Heelis, R. A., J. K. Lowell, R. W. Spiro, A model of the high‐latitude ionospheric convection pattern, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 6339, 1982.
8. Heppner, J. P., N. C. Maynard, Empirical high‐latitude electric field models, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 4467, 1987.
9. Lu, G., P. H. Reiff, M. R. Hairston, R. A. Heelis, J. L. Karty, Distribution of convection potential around the polar cap boundary as a function of the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 13, 447, 1989.
10. Lühr, H., A. Aylward, S. C. Buchert, A. Pajunpää, K. Pajunpää, T. Holmboe, S. M. Zalewski, Westward moving dynamic substorm features observed with the IMAGE magnetometer network and other ground‐based instruments, Ann. Geophys., 16, 425, 1998.
11. Maynard, N. C., E. A. Bielecki, H. F. Burdick, Instrumentation for vector electric field measurements from DE‐B, Space Sci. Instrum., 5, 523, 1981.
12. Papitashvili, V. O., B. A. Belov, D. S. Faermark, Y. I. Feldstein, S. A. Golyshev, L. I. Gromova, A. E. Levitin, Electric potential patterns in the northern and southern polar regions parameterized by the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 12, 251, 1994.
13. Rich, F. J., M. Hairston, Large‐scale convection patterns observed by DMSP, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 3827, 1994.
14. Ridley, A. J., G. Lu, C. R. Clauer, V. O. Papitashvili, Ionospheric convection during nonsteady interplanetary magnetic field conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 14,563, 1997.
15. Ridley, A. J., G. Lu, C. R. Clauer, V. O. Papitashvili, A statistical study of the ionospheric convection response to changing interplanetary magnetic field conditions using the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics technique, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4023, 1998.
16. Rostoker, G., Triggering of expansive phase intensifications of magnetospheric substorms by northward turnings of the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 6981, 1983.
17. Ruohoniemi, J. M., R. A. Greenwald, Statistical patterns of high‐latitude convection obtained from Goose Bay HF radar observations, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21, 743, 1996.
18. Ruohoniemi, J. M., R. A. Greenwald, The response of high‐latitude convection to a sudden southward IMF turning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2913, 1998.
19. Shepherd, S. G., R. A. Greenwald, J. M. Ruohoniemi, A possible explanation for rapid, large‐scale ionospheric responses to southward turnings of the IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3197, 1999.
20. Shue, J.‐H., D. R. Weimer, The relationship between ionospheric convection and magnetic activity, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 401, 1994.
21. Sonnerup, B. U. Ö., Magnetopause reconnection rate, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 1546, 1974.
22. Vassiliadis, D., A. J. Klimas, D. N. Baker, D. A. Roberts, A description of the solar wind‐magnetospheric coupling based on nonlinear filters, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 3495, 1995.
23. Viljanen, A., L. Häkkinen, IMAGE magnetometer network, Satellite‐Ground Based Coordination Sourcebook, edited by M. Lockwood, M. N. Wild, H. J. Opgenoorth, Eur. Space Agency Spec. Publ., ESA SP‐, 1198, 111, 1997.
24. Weimer, D. R., Models of high‐latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19,595, 1995.
25. Weimer, D. R., A flexible IMF dependent model of high‐latitude electric potentials having “space weather” applications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2549, 1996.
26. Weimer, D. R., Substorm influence on the ionospheric electric potentials and currents, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 185, 1999.