University of Michigan MHD results of the geospace global circulation model metrics challenge

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Volumn 107, Issue A10, 2002, Pages

  Ridley, A J ^a   Hansen, K C ^a   Toth G ^a   De Zeeuw, D L ^a   Gombosi, T I ^a   Powell, K G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b University of Michigan   (United States)

Author keywords

Convection; Electrodynamics; Ionosphere; Magnetosphere; Metrics; MHD

Indexed keywords

EID: 0142068459     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21699402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2001JA000253     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Fedder, J. A., S. P. Slinker, and J. G. Lyon, A comparison of global numerical simulation results to data for the January 27-28, 1992, Geospace Environment Modeling challenge event, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14,799, 1998.
2. Friis-Christiansen, E., V. O. Papitashvili, and T. Neubert, Seasonal variations of high-latitude field-aligned current systems inferred from Orsted and Magsat observations, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A2), doi:10.1029/ 2001JA900104, 2002.
3. Gombosi, T. I., K. G. Powell, and B. van Leer, Comment on "Modeling the magnetosphere for northward interplanetary magnetic field: Effects of electrical resistivity" by J. Raeder, Z. Geophys. Res., 105, 13,141, 2000.
4. Groth, C. P. T., D. L. DeZeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, and K. G. Powell, Global three-dimensional MHD simulation of a space weather event: CME formation, interplanetary propagation, and interaction with the magnetosphere, J.Geophys. Res., 105, 25,053, 2000.
5. Hairston, M. R., and R. A. Heelis, Response time of the polar ionospheric convection pattern to changes in the north-south direction of the IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 631, 1995.
6. Liou, K., P. T. Newell, C.-I. Meng, M. Brittnacher, and G. Parks, Synoptic auroral distribution: A survey using Polar ultraviolet imagery, J.Geophys. Res., 102, 27,197, 1997.
7. Powell, K. G., P. L. Roe, T. J. Linde, T. I. Gombosi, and D. L. De Zeeuw, A solution-adaptive upwind scheme for ideal magnetohydrodynamics, J.Comput Phys., 154, 284, 1999.
8. Raeder, J., Modeling the magnetosphere for northward IMF: Effects of electrical resistivity, J.Geophys. Res., 104, 17,357, 1999.
9. Raeder, J., Reply, J.Geophys. Res., 105, 13,149, 2000.
10. Raeder, J., J. Berchem, M. Ashour-Abdalla, L. A. Frank, W. R. Paterson, K. L. Ackerson, S. Kokubun, T. Yamamoto, and J. A. Slavin, Boundary layer formation in the magnetotail: Geotail observations and comparisons with a global MHD simulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 951, 1997.
11. Raeder, J., J. Berchem, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, The Geospace Environment Modeling Grand Challenge: Results from a Global Geospace Circulation Model, J.Geophys. Res., 103, 14,787, 1998.
12. Rich, F. J., and M. Hairston, Large-scale convection patterns observed by DMSP, J.Geophys. Res., 99, 3827, 1994.
13. Richmond, A. D., and Y. Kamide, Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: Technique, J.Geophys. Res., 93, 5741, 1988.
14. Ridley, A. J., Estimation of the uncertainty in timing the relationship between magnetospheric and solar wind processes, J.Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 62, 757, 2000.
15. Ridley, A. J., D. L. De Zeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, and K. G. Powell, Using steady state MHD results to predict the global state of the magnetosphereionosphere system, J.Geophys. Res., 106, 30,067, 2001.
16. Ruohoniemi, J. M., and R. A. Greenwald, Statistical patterns of high-latitude convection obtained from Goose Bay HF radar observations, J.Geophys. Res., 101, 21,743, 1996.
17. Russell, C. T., J. G. Luhmann, and G. Lu, Nonlinear response of the polar ionosphere to large values of the interplanetary magnetic field, J.Geophys. Res., 106, 18,495, 2001.
18. Song, P., D. L. De Zeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, C. P. T. Groth, and K. G. Powell, A numerical study of solar wind-magnetosphere interaction for northward interplanetary magnetic field, J.Geophys. Res., 104, 28,361, 1999.
19. Weimer, D. R., A flexible, IMF-dependent model of high-latitude electric potential having "space weather" applications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 2549, 1996.