Democracy and Evaluation

Evaluation

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 119-127

  House, Ernest R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747068247     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389006064196     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Braudel, F. (1981, 1982, 1984) Civilization and Capitalism: 15th to 18th Centuries, 3 vols. New York: Harper Row.
2. Cousins, J. B. and E. Whitmore (1998) ‘Framing Participatory Evaluation’, in E. Whitmore (ed.) Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation, pp. 5–23. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Fetterman, D. (2001) Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4. Furubo, J.-E., R. Rist and R. Sandahl, eds (2002) International Atlas of Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
5. Glanz, J. (2004) ‘Scientists Say Administration Distorts Facts’, New York Times (9 Feb.).
6. Greene, J. (2003) ‘War and Peace… and Evaluation’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 2-2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
7. Hanberger, A. (2001) ‘Policy and Program Evaluation, Civil Society, and Democracy’, American Journal of Evaluation 22(2): 211–228.
8. House, E. R. (2003) ‘Bush's Neo-Fundamentalism and the New Politics of Evaluation’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 2-2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se)
9. House, E. R. and K. R. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10. Karlsson, O. (1996) ‘A Critical Dialogue in Evaluation: How can Interaction between Evaluation and Politics be Tackled?’, Evaluation 2: 405–416.
11. Karlsson, O. (2003) ‘Evaluation Politics in Europe: Trends and Tendencies’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 1-1. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
12. King, J. A. (1998) ‘Making Sense of Participatory Evaluation’, in E. Whitmore (ed.) Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation, pp. 57–67. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Krogstrup, H. K. (2003) ‘User Participation in Evaluation: Top–Down and Bottom–Up Perspectives’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 1. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
14. Kushner, S. (2000) Personalizing Evaluation. London: SAGE.
15. MacDonald, B. and S. Kushner (2004) ‘Democratic Evaluation’, in S. Mathison (ed.) Encyclopedia of Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
16. Mark, M. M., G. T. Henry and G. Julnes (2000) Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17. Murray, R. (2002) ‘Citizens’ Control of Evaluations’, Evaluation 8(1): 81–100.
18. Palumbo, M. (2002) Quality and Quantity in Evaluation, Social Research, and Democracy. Seville: European Evaluation Society.
19. Patton, M. Q. (2002) ‘A Vision of Evaluation that Strengthens Democracy’, Evaluation 8(1): 125–139.
20. Pear, R. (2004) ‘Taking Spin out of Report that made Bad into Good Health’, New York Times (22 Feb.).
21. Ryan, K. A. and DeStefano, L., eds (2003) Evaluation as a Democratic Process: Promoting Inclusion, Dialogue, and Deliberation. New Directions for Evaluation, 85-85. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Schwandt, T. A. (2003) ‘In Search of Political Morality of Evaluation Practice’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
23. Segerholm, C. (2003) ‘To Govern in Silence: An Essay on the Political in National Evaluations of the Public Schools in Sweden’, in O. Karlsson (ed.) Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy 2. Sweden: Uppsala University (www.upi.artisan.se).
24. Simons, H. (1987) Getting to Know Schools in a Democracy. London: Falmer.
25. Stein, J. G. (2001) The Cult of Efficiency. Toronto: Anansi.
26. Woodward, B. (2004) Plan of Attack. New York: Simon & Schuster.