'Cheap and dirty' fisheries science and management in the North Atlantic

Fisheries Research

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 233-238

  Kelly, Ciaran J ^a   Codling, Edward A ^b  

^a MARINE INSTITUTE   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Empirical indicators; Fisheries indicators; Fisheries management; Harvest control rules; ICES advice; North Atlantic fisheries; Process management; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY SCIENCE; HARVESTING;

EID: 33747063874     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2006.03.007     Document Type: Note

References (40)

1. Baranov T.I. On the question of the biological basis of fisheries. Nauchnyi Issledovatelskii Ikhtiologicheskii Institut Isvestia 1 (1918) 81-128
2. Beverton R.J.H., and Holt S.J. On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations (1957), Chapman Hall, London (1993 facsimile reprint)
3. Caddy J.F. Current usage of fisheries indicators and reference points, and their potential application to management of fisheries for marine invertebrates. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 61 (2004) 1307-1324
4. Christensen V., Guenette S., Heymans J.J., Walters C.J., Watson R., Zeller D., and Pauly D. Hundred-year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes. Fish Fisheries 4 (2003) 1-24
5. Cotter A.J.R., Burt L., Paxton C.G.M., Fernandez C., Buckland S.T., and Pan J.-X. Are stock assessment methods too complicated. Fish Fisheries 5 (2004) 235-254
6. Daw T., and Gray T. Fisheries science and sustainability in international policy: a study of failure in the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy. Marine Policy 29 (2005) 189-197
7. De Meyer A., Loch C.H., and Pich M.T. Managing project uncertainty: from variation to chaos. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 60-67 (2002) Winter 2002
8. Froese R. Keep it simple: three indicators to deal with overfishing. Fish Fisheries 5 (2004) 86-91
9. Garcia, S.M., 1996. The Precautionary Approach to Fisheries and its Implications for Fishery Research, Technology and Management: An Updated Review. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, issue 350//2, 1-76 pp. ISSN 0429-9345
10. Hall S.J., and Mainprize B. Towards ecosystem-based fisheries management. Fish Fisheries 5 (2004) 1-20
11. Hilborn R. The dark side of reference points. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70 (2002) 403-408
12. Hilborn R. The state of the art in stock assessment: where we are and where we are going. Scientia Marina 67 1 (2003) 15-20
13. ICES, 2002. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, 2002. ICES Co. operative Research Report No. 255, 963 pp.
14. ICES, 2005a. Report of the Working Group on the Assessment of Northern Shelf Demersal Stocks (WGNSDS). ICES Document CM 2006/ACFM: 13, 803 pp.
15. ICES, 2005b. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems, 2005. ICES Advice, vols. 1-11, 1418 pp.
16. ICES, 2006. Report of the Study Group on Management Strategies (SGMAS). ICES Document. ICES CM 2006/ACFM:15, 157pp.
17. Kelly C.J., Codling E.A., and Rogan E. The Irish Sea Cod recovery plan: some lessons learned. ICES J. Marine Sci. 63 (2006) 600-610
18. Larkin P.A. An epitaph for the concept of maximum sustained yield. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106 (1977) 1-11
19. Link J.S., Brodziak J.K.T., Edwards S.F., Overholtz W.J., Mountain D., Jossi J.W., Smith T.D., and Fogarty M.J. Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 59 (2002) 1429-1440
20. Mace P.M. A new role for MSY in single-species and ecosystem approaches to fisheries stock assessment and management. Fish Fisheries 2 (2001) 2-32
21. Manly B.F.J., and Mackenzie D. A cumulative sum type of method for environmental monitoring. Environmetrics 11 (2000) 151-166 2000
22. Myers R.A., and Cadigan N.G. Was an increase in natural mortality responsible for the collapse of northern cod?. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 52 (1995) 1274-1285
23. Myers R.A., and Worm B. Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish Communities. Nature 423 (2003) 280-283
24. Needle C.L. Recruitment models: diagnosis and prognosis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 11 2 (2002) 95-111
25. Patterson K., Cook R., Darby C., Gavaris S., Kell L., Lewy P., Mesnil B., Punt A., Restrepo V., Skagen D.W., and Stefansson G. Estimating uncertainty in fish stock assessment and forecasting. Fish Fisheries 2 (2001) 125-157
26. Pauly D., Christensen V., Guenette S., Pitcher T.J., Sumaila U.R., Walters C.J., Watson R., and Zeller D. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418 (2002) 689-695
27. Pikitch E.K., et al. Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305 (2004) 346-347
28. Pitcher T.J. Ecosystem goals can reinvigorate fisheries management, help dispute resolution and encourage public support. Fish Fisheries 1 (2000) 99-103
29. Punt A.E. The performance of VPA-based management. Fisheries Res. 29 (1997) 217-243
30. Punt A.E., and Hilborn R. Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 7 (1997) 35-63
31. Punt A.E., Campbell R., and Smith ADM. Evaluating empirical indicators and reference points for fisheries management: application to the broadbill swordfish fishery off Eastern Australia. Mar. Fresh. Res. 52 (2001) 819-832
32. Rochet M.-J., and Trenkel V.M. Which community indicators can measure the impact of fishing? A review and proposals. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60 (2003) 86-99
33. Rochet M.-J., Trenkel V.M., Bellail R., Coppin F., Le Pape O., Mahe J.-C., Morin J., Poulard J.-C., Schlaich I., Souplet A., Verin Y., and Bertrand J. Combining indicator trends to assess ongoing changes in exploited fish communities: diagnostic of communities off the coasts of France. ICES J. Marine Sci. 62 (2005) 1647-1664
34. Scandol J. Use of cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts of landed catch in the management of fisheries. Fish. Res. 64 (2003) 19-36
35. Scandol, J., 2004. A framework for the assessment of harvested fish resources in NSW. NSW Department of Primary Industries - Fisheries Resource Assessment Series. No. 15 August 2004. ISSN 1449-9940
36. Scandol, J., 2005. Use of Quality Control Methods to Monitor the Status of Fish Stocks. In: Kruse, G.H., Gallucci, V.F., Hay, D.E., Perry, R.I., Peterman, R.M., Shirley, T.C., Spencer, P.D., Wilson, B., Woodby, D. (Eds.), Fisheries Assessment in Data-Limited Situations. Alaska Sea Grant AK-SG-05-02. ISBN:156612-093-4, pp. 213-234.
37. Schnute J.T., and Richards L.J. Use and abuse of fishery models. Can. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci. 58 (2001) 10-17
38. Shin Y.-J., Rochet M.-J., Jennings S., Field J.G., and Gislason H. Using size- based indicators to evaluate the ecosystem effects of fishing. ICES J. Marine Sci. 62 (2005) 384-396
39. Smith R.P., and Eppinger S.D. A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Manage. Sci. 43 1 (1997) 104-1120
40. Trenkel V.M., and Rochet M.-J. Performance of indicators derived from abundance estimates for detecting the impact of fishing on a fish community. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 60 (2003) 67-85