Use of cumulative sum (CUSUM) control charts of landed catch in the management of fisheries

Fisheries Research

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 19-36

  Scandol, James P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Cronulla Fisheries Research Centre of Excellence   (Australia)

Author keywords

CUSUM; Data deficient; Impact; Indicators; Landed catch; Monitoring; Precautionary principle; Reference points; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CATCH STATISTICS; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0242308892     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-7836(03)00104-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anon., 2000. Juvenile Prawn Summit: Summary of Proceedings. Cronulla Fisheries Centre, NSW Fisheries.
2. Bury, K., 1999. Statistical Distributions in Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Caddy, J.F., 1999. Deciding on precautionary management measures for stock based on a suite of limit reference points (LRPs) as a basis for a multi-LRP harvest law. NAFO Sci. Coun. Stud. 32, 55-68.
4. Caddy, J.F., Gulland, J.A., 1983. Historical patterns of fish stocks. Mar. Pol. 7, 267-278.
5. Caddy, J.F., Mahon, R., 1995. Reference points for fisheries management. FAO Fish. Tech. Paper 347, 83.
6. Campbell, R., 1998. Catch and effort analysis with uncertain stock and effort dynamics: southern bluefin tuna longline. In: Funk, F., Quinn, T.J., Heifetz, J., Ianelli, J.N., Powers, J.E., Schweigert, J.F., Sullivan, P.J., Zhang, C.-I. (Eds.), Fishery Stock Assessment Models. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, pp. 75-95.
7. Derman, C., Ross, S.M., 1997. Statistical Aspects of Quality Control. Academic Press, London.
8. Dew, I.M., 2001. Theoretical model of a new fishery under a simple quota management system. Ecol. Mod. 143, 59-70.
9. Essington, T.E., 2001. The precautionary approach in fisheries management: the devil is in the details. TREE 16, 121-122.
10. FAO, 1995. Precautionary approach to fisheries. Part 1. Guidelines on the precautionary approach to capture fisheries and species introductions. FAO Fish. Tech. Paper 350.
11. Francis, R.I.C.C., Shotton, R., 1997. Risk in fisheries management: a review. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 1699-1715.
12. Froese, R., Pauly, D., 2001. FishBase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. http://www.fishbase.org.
13. Garcia, S.M., 1994. The Precautionary principle: its implications in capture fisheries management. Ocean Coast. Manage. 22, 99-125.
14. Gilbert, D.J., Annala, J.H., Johnston, K., 2000. Technical background to fish stock indicators for state-of-environment reporting in New Zealand. Mar. Freshw. Res. 51, 451-464.
15. Glaister, J.P., Lau, T., McDonall, V.C., 1987. Growth and migration of tagged eastern Australian king prawns, Penaeus plebejus Hess. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 38, 225-241.
16. Gordon, G.N.G., Andrew, N.L., Montgomery, S.S., 1995. Deterministic compartmental model for the Eastern King Prawn (Penaeus plebejus) fishery in New South Wales. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 46, 793-807.
17. Gray, C.A., Pease, B.C., Stringfellow, S.L., Raines, L.P., Rankin, B.K., Walford, T.R., 2000. Sampling Estuarine Fish Species for Stock Assessment. NSW Fisheries, Cronulla.
18. Haddon, M., 2001. Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
19. Hall, S.J., 1999. The Effects of Fishing on Marine Ecosystems and Communities. Blackwell Science Publications, Oxford.
20. Hammond, K.R., 1996. Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. Oxford University Press, New York.
21. Hawkins, D.M., Olwell, D.H., 1997. Cumulative Sum Charts and Charting for Quality Improvement. Springer, New York.
22. Hilborn, R., 2002. The dark side of reference points. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70, 403-408.
23. Hilborn, R., Walters, C.J., 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. Chapman & Hall, London.
24. Kaufmann, B., Geen, G., Sen, S., 1999. Fish Futures: Individual Transferable Quotas in Fisheries. Fisheries Economics, Research and Management, Canberra.
25. Kesteven, G.L., 1999. Stock assessment and the management of fishing activities. Fish. Res. 44, 105-112.
26. Lane, D.E., Kaufmann, B., 1993. Bioeconomic impacts of TAC adjustment strategies: a model applied to northern cod. Risk evaluation and biological reference points for fisheries management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 120, 387-402.
27. Manly, B.F.J., 2001. Statistics for Environmental Science and Management. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
28. Manly, B.F.J., MacKenzie, D., 2000. A cumulative sum type of method for environmental monitoring. Environmetrics 11, 151-166.
29. Megrey, B.A., 1989. Review and comparison of age-structured stock assessment models from theoretical and applied points of view. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 6, 8-48.
30. Nicholson, M.D., 1984. Some applications of CUSUM techniques in fisheries research. ICES CM 1984/D:5.
31. Peterman, R.M., 1990. Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 2-15.
32. Punt, A.E., Walker, T.I., Taylor, B.L., Pribac, F., 2000. Standardization of catch and effort data in a spatially-structured shark fishery. Fish. Res. 45, 129-145.
33. Quinn, T.J., Deriso, R.B., 1999. Quantitative Fish Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York.
34. Schnute, J., 1987. A general fishery model for a size-structured population. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 44, 924-940.
35. Schnute, J.T., Richards, L.J., 2001. Use and abuse of fishery models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 10-17.
36. Seijo, J.C., Caddy, J.F., 2000. Uncertainty in bio-economic reference points and indicators of marine fisheries. Mar. Freshw. Res. 51, 477-483.
37. Sparks, R.S., 2000. CUSUM charts for AR1 data: are they worth the effort? Aust. NZ J. Stat. 42, 25-42.
38. Underwood, A.J., 1997. Environmental decision-making and the precautionary principle: what does this principle mean in environmental sampling practice? Lands. Urb. Plan. 37, 137-146.
39. Walters, C.J., Pearse, P.H., 1996. Stock information requirements for quota management systems in commercial fisheries. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 6, 21-42.