Distinct dynamic behaviors of water molecules in hydrated pores

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 31, 2006, Pages 10008-10009

  Febles, Martín ^a   Pérez Hernández, Natalia ^b   Pérez, Cirilo ^a   Rodríguez, Matías L ^a   Foces Foces, Concepción ^c   Roux, María Victoria ^c   Morales, Ezequiel Q ^b   Buntkowsky, Gerd ^d   Limbach, Hans Heinrich ^e   Martín, Julio D ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES QUÍMICAS   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTO DE QUÍMICA FÍSICA ROCASOLANO   (Spain)

^d FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^e FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WATER;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIFFERENTIAL SCANNING CALORIMETRY; DYNAMICS; HYDROGEN BOND; POROSITY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; WATER;

EID: 33746957930     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja063223j     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. (a) Hille, B. Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes, 3rd ed.; Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, 2001.
2. (b) Eiseberg, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 117-123.
3. (c) Aidley, D.; Stanfield, P. Ion Channels; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1996.
4. (a) Dutzler, R.; Campbell, E. B.; Cadene, M.; Chait, B.; MacKinnon, R. Nature 2002, 415, 287-294.
5. (b) Morais-Cabral, J. H.; Zhou, Y.; MacKinnon, R. Nature 2001, 414, 37-42.
6. (a) Fujiyoshi, Y.; Mitsuoka, K.; de Groot, B. L.; Philippsen, A.; Grubmüller, H.; Agre, P.; Engel, A. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2002, 12, 509-515.
7. (b) Tajkhorshid, E.; Nollert, P.; Jensen, M. Ø.; Miercke, L. J. W.; O'Connell, J.; Stroud, R. M.; Schulten, K. Science 2002, 296, 525-530.
8. (c) Sui, H.; Han, B.-G.; Lee, J. K.; Walian, P.; Jap, B. K. Nature 2001, 414, 872-878.
9. (d) Cho, M. R.; Knowles, D. W.; Smith, B. L.; Moulds, J. J.; Agre, P.; Mohandas, N.; Golan, D. E. Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 1136-1144.
10. (a) Guissani, Y.; Guillot, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 8221-8235.
11. (b) Belch, A. C.; Berkowitz, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 113, 278-282.
12. (c) Jorgesen, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 335-340.
13. Zeidel, M. L.; Ambudkar, S. V.; Smith, B. L.; Agre, P. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 7436-7440.
14. The influence of the channel size on water permeation has received significant attention: (a) Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Lu, X.-H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 829-835.
15. (b) Grubmüller, H. Proc. Natl. Acd. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 7421-7422.
16. (c) Sansom, M. S. P.; Biggin, P. C. Nature 2001, 414, 156-157.
17. (a) Beckstein, O.; Sansom, M. S. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 7063-7068.
18. (b) Levinger, N. E. Science 2002, 298, 1722-1723.
19. (c) Hummer, G.; Rasaiah, J. C.; Noworyta, J. P. Nature 2001, 414, 188-190.
20. (d) Tieleman, D. P.; Biggin, P. C.; Smith, G. R.; Sansom, M. S. P. Q. Rev. Biophys. 2001, 34, 473-561.
21. (e) Klein, M. L. Science 2001, 291, 2106-2107.
22. (f) Koga, K.; Tanaka, H.; Zeng, X. C. Nature 2000, 408, 564-567.
23. (a) Gillon, A. L.; Feeder, N.; Davey, R. J.; Storey, R. Cryst. Growth Des. 2003, 3, 663-673.
24. (b) Infantes, L.; Motherwell, S. CrystEngComm 2002, 4, 454-461.
25. For recent examples, see: (a) Tadokoro, M.; Fukui, S.; Kitajima, T.; Nagao, Y.; Ishimaru, S.; Kitawara, H.; Isobe, K.; Nakasuji, K. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1274-1276.
26. (b) Zuhayra, M.; Kampen, W. U.; Henze, E.; Soti, Z.; Zsolnai, L.; Huttner, G.; Oberdorfer, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 424-425.
27. (c) Luna-Garcia, R.; Damian-Murillo, B. M.; Barba, V.; Höpfl, H.; Beltran, H. I.; Zamudio-Rivera, L. S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5527-5529.
28. (d) Thallapally, P. K.; Lloyd, G. O.; Atwood, J. L.; Barbour, L. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3848-3851.
29. (e) Banerjee, R.; Bhatt, P. M.; Kirchner, M. T.; Desiraju, G. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2515-2520.
30. (f) Saha, B. K.; Nangia, A. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3024-3025.
31. (g) Oxtaby, N. S.; Blake, A. J.; Champness, N. R.; Wilson, C. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4643-4654.
32. (h) Naskar, J. P.; Drew, M. G. B.; Hulme, A.; Tocher, D. A.; Datta, D. CrystEngComm 2005, 7, 67-70.
33. (a) Ohba, T.; Kanoh, H.; Kaneko, K. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4890-4894.
34. (b) Köddermann, T.; Schulte, F.; Huelsekopf, M.; Ludwig, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4904-4908.
35. (c) Werder, T.; Walther, J. H.; Jaffe, R. L.; Halicioglu, T.; Koumoutsakos, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 1345-1352.
36. (a) Carrasco, H.; Foces-Foces, C.; Pérez, C.; Rodríguez, M. L.; Martín, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11970-11981.
37. (b) Pérez, C.; Espínola, C. G.; Foces-Foces, C.; Núñez-Coello, P.; Carrasco, H.; Martín, J. D. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1185-1188.
38. 2H NMR spectra for 1 show a sharp decrease in structural water mobility in the temperatures range from 253 to 223 K. Accordingly, DSC measurements for 1 show a broad endotherm in the temperature interval, 197-273 K, indicating a higher organization of this type of water molecule when the temperature is lowered (Supporting Information).
39. For related studies, see: (a) Su, C.-Y.; Goforth, A. M.; Smith, M. D.; Pellechia, P. J.; Loye, H.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3576-3586.
40. (b) Cheruzel, L. E.; Pometum, M. S.; Cecil, M. R.; Mashuta, M. S.; Wittebort, R. J.; Buchanan, R. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5452-5455.
41. For a general methodology for the synthesis of unsaturated homologues, see: Pérez-Hernández, N.; Fehles, M.; Pérez, C.; Pérez, R.; Rodríguez, M. L.; Foces-Foces, C.; Martín, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1139-1151.
42. 2O is isomorphous with that of the ethyl homologue 1 and has been determined at 293, 170, and 115 K. There is no evidence for phase transition when cooling the sample, and the differences are due to the thermal motion which mainly affects the disordered water molecules inside the pore. The main differences between both structures can be attributed to the size of the monomer appendages, larger in 2 than in 1, that affects the inner size of the pore by narrowing the diameter to 4.2-6.5 Å. The water molecule inside the pore in 2 is disordered over three positions. The one with major occupancy factor (ca. 75% of the cells) and those symmetry-related by the -3 axis form a slightly distorted octahedron. The two positions with minor occupancy factors account for the remaining 25%, one is on the octahedron center while the second one is also positioned on the -3 axis but off the octahedron (Supporting Information).
43. (a) Kuhs, W. F.; Lehmann, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4312-4313.
44. (b) Peterson, S. W.; Levy, H. A. Acta Crystallogr. 1957, 10, 70-76.
45. The freezing/melting temperature interval depends on the pore diameter: Höhne, G. W. H.; Hemminger, W. F.; Flammersheim, H.-J. Differential Scanning Calorimetry, 2nd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2003.