An investigation into the relationship between input-output nonlinearities and rate-induced nonlinearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences

Hearing Research

Volumn 219, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 24-35

  Lineton, B ^a   Thornton, A R D ^a   Baker, V J ^b  

^a ROYAL SOUTH HANTS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Click evoked; Maximum length sequences; Otoacoustic emissions; Rate suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33746892315     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Cooper, H.E., 2006. Modelling the properties of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions at very high stimulus rates. MSc Dissertation, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
2. Davies W.D.T. Generation and properties of maximum length sequences. Control 10 (1966) 302-304
3. Elberling C., and Don M. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand. Audiol. 13 (1984) 187-197
4. Gobsch H., and Tietze G. Interrelation of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 69 (1993) 176-181
5. Harte J.M., and Elliott S.J. Using the short-time correlation coefficient to compare transient- and derived, noise-evoked otoacoustic emission temporal waveforms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117 (2005) 2989-2998
6. Hine J.E., and Thornton A.R.D. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences as a function of stimulus rate and level. Ear Hear. 18 (1997) 121-128
7. Hine J.E., Thornton A.R.D., and Brookes G.B. Effect of olivocochlear bundle section on evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences. Hear. Res. 108 (1997) 28-36
8. Hine J.E., Ho C.T., Slaven A., and Thornton A.R.D. Comparison of transient evoked otoacoustic emission thresholds recorded conventionally and using maximum length sequences. Hear. Res. 156 (2001) 104-114
9. Johannesen P.T., Rassmussen A.N., and Osterhammel P.A. Instrumentation for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. Scand. Audiol. 27 (1998) 37-42
10. Kapadia S., and Lutman M.E. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry. Hear. Res. 146 (2000) 89-100
11. Kapadia S., and Lutman M.E. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: II. Experimental data. Hear. Res. 146 (2000) 101-120
12. Kapadia S., and Lutman M.E. Static input-output non-linearity as the source of non-linear effects in maximum length sequence click-evoked OAEs. Br. J. Audiol. 35 (2001) 103-112
13. Kemp D.T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64 (1978) 1386-1391
14. Kemp D.T., and Chum R. Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 2 (1980) 213-232
15. Kulawiec J.T., and Orlando M.S. The contribution of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to the click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 16 (1995) 515-520
16. Lina-Granade G., Liogier X., and Collet L. Contralateral suppression and stimulus rate effects on evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 107 (1997) 92-93
17. Lutman M.E., and Shephard S. Quality estimation of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions. Scand. Audiol. 19 (1990) 3-7
18. Maat B., Wit H.P., and van Dijk P. Noise-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 2272-2280
19. Neely S.T., Norton S.J., Gorga M.P., and Jesteadt W. Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82 (1988) 652-656
20. Norton S.J., and Neely S.T. Tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81 (1987) 1860-1872
21. Patuzzi R. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In: Dallos P., Popper A.N., and Fay R.R. (Eds). The Cochlea (1996), Springer-Verlag, New York 186-257
22. Picton T.W., Kellett A.F.C., Vezsenyi M., and Rabinovitch D.E. Otoacoustic emissions recorded at rapid stimulus rates. Ear. Hear. 14 (1993) 299-314
23. Probst R., Coats A.C., Martin G.K., and Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear. Res. 21 (1986) 261-275
24. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., and Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89 (1991) 2027-2067
25. Rassmussen A.N., Osterhammel F.A., Johannesen P.T., and Borgkvist B. Neonatal hearing screening using otoacoustic emissions elicited by maximum length sequences. Br. J. Audiol. 32 (1998) 355-366
26. Rife D.G., and Vanderkoy J. Transfer function measurement with maximum length sequences. J. Audio. Eng. Soc. 37 (1989) 419-444
27. Rutten W.L. Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears: comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings. Hear. Res. 2 (1980) 263-271
28. Ryan S., and Kemp D.T. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 94 (1996) 140-147
29. Shera C.A., and Zweig G. Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93 (1993) 3333-3352
30. Shi Y., and Hecox K.E. Non-linear system identification by m-pulse sequences: application to brainstem auditory evoked responses. IEEE Trans. Boomed. Eng. 38 (1991) 834-845
31. Talmadge C.L., and Tubis A. On modelling the connection between spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: Duifhuis H., Horst J.W., van Dijk P., and van Netten S.M. (Eds). Biophysics of Hair-Cell Sensory Systems (1993), World Scientific, Singapore 25-32
32. Tavartkiladze G.A., Frolenkov G.I., Kruglov A.V., and Artamasov S.V. Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Br. J. Audiol. 28 (1994) 193-204
33. Tavartkiladze G.A., Frolenkov G.I., Kruglov A.V., and Artamasov S.V. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: Robinette M.S., and Glattke T.J. (Eds). Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications (1997), Thieme, New York 110-129
34. Thornton A.R.D. High rate otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94 (1993) 132-136
35. Thornton A.R.D. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: new techniques and applications. Br. J. Audiol. 27 (1993) 109-115
36. Thornton A.R.D. Contralateral and ipsilateral 'suppression' of evoked otoacoustic emissions at high stimulation rates. Br. J. Audiol. 28 (1994) 227-234
37. Thornton A.R. Maximum length sequences and Volterra series in the analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Br. J. Audiol. 31 (1997) 493-498
38. Thornton A.R.D., and Slaven A. The effect of stimulus rate on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scand. Audiol. 24 (1994) 83-90
39. Thornton A.R.D., Folkard T.J., and Chambers J.D. Technical aspects of recording evoked otoacoustic emissions using maximum length sequences. Scand. Audiol. 23 (1994) 225-231
40. Zwicker E. Delayed evoked oto-acoustic emissions and their suppression by Gaussian-shaped pressure impulses. Hear. Res. 11 (1983) 359-371