Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data

Hearing Research

Volumn 146, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 101-120

  Kapadia, Sarosh ^a   Lutman, Mark E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Click response; Cochlear mechanics; Inter click interval; Model; Nonlinear interaction; Otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLICK; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MECHANICS; MODEL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEA; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 0033910765     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00103-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Avan P., Bonfils P., Loth D., Narcy P., Trotoux J. Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 52:1991;99-112.
2. Avan P., Bonfils P., Loth D., Wit H.P. Temporal patterns of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired cochleae. Hear. Res. 70:1993;109-120.
3. Avan P., Elbez M., Bonfils P. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the influence of high-frequency hearing losses in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;2771-2777.
4. Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Hurley A.E., Wen H., Kemp D.T. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear. Res. 87:1995;96-103.
5. Bonfils P., Bertrand Y., Uziel A. Evoked otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and presbycusis. Audiology. 27:1988;27-35.
6. Cheatham M.A., Dallos P. Stimulus biasing: A comparison between cochlear hair cell and organ of corti response patterns. Hear. Res. 75:1994;103-113.
7. Collet L., Kemp D.T., Veuillet E., Duclaux R., Moulin A., Morgon A. Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear. Res. 43:1990;251-262.
8. Cooper N.P., Rhode W.S. Fast traveling waves, slow traveling waves and their interactions in experimental studies of apical cochlear mechanics. Aud. Neurosci. 2:1996;289-299.
9. Cope, Y., Lutman, M.E., 1988. Oto-acoustic emissions. In: McCormick, B. (Ed.), Paediatric Audiology 0-5 years. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 221-245.
10. de Boer E. Auditory physics. Physical principles in hearing theory. III. Physics Rep. 203:1991;125-231.
11. 2. Hear. Res. 113:1997;57-68.
12. Gobsch H., Tietze G. Interrelation of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 69:1993;176-181.
13. Hine J.E., Thornton A.R.D. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences as a function of stimulus rate and level. Ear Hear. 18:1997;121-128.
14. Johnsen N.J., Bagi P., Parbo J., Elberling C. Evoked acoustic emissions from the human ear. IV. Final results in 100 neonates. Scand. Audiol. 17:1988;27-34.
15. Kapadia S., Lutman M.E. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry. Hear. Res. 146:2000;89-100.
16. Kemp, D.T., 1997. Otoacoustic emissions in perspective. In: Robinette, M.S. and Glattke, T.J. (Eds.), Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications. Thieme, New York, pp. 1-21.
17. Kemp D.T., Chum R.A. Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 2:1980;213-232.
18. Kevanishvili Z., Tietze G., Gobsch H. Effects of the conditioning click on click-evoked otoacoustic emission. Scand. Audiol. 25:1996;161-166.
19. Kulawiec J.T., Orlando M.S. The contribution of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to the click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 16:1995;515-520.
20. Lina-Granade G., Collet L. Effect of interstimulus-interval on evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 87:1995;55-61.
21. Lina-Granade G., Liogier X., Collet L. Contralateral suppression and stimulus rate effects on evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 107:1997;83-92.
22. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. Descriptive model of the receptor potential non-linearities generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:1998;973-980.
23. Patuzzi, R., 1996. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A.N. and Fay, R.R. (Eds.), The Cochlea. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 186-257.
24. Patuzzi R.B., Yates G.K., Johnstone B.M. Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear. Res. 42:1989;47-72.
25. Prieve B.A., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T. Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1996;3077-3086.
26. Probst R., Coats A.C., Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Spontaneous click- and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear. Res. 21:1986;261-275.
27. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;2027-2067.
28. Recio A., Rich N.C., Narayan S.S., Ruggero M.A. Basilar-membrane responses to clicks at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:1998;1972-1989.
29. Ruggero M.A. Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2:1992;449-456.
30. Ruggero M.A. Cochlear delays and traveling waves - comments on 'Experimental look at cochlear mechanics'. Audiology. 33:1994;131-142.
31. Ruggero M.A., Robles L., Rich N.C. Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. J. Neurophysiol. 68:1992;1087-1099.
32. Sutton G.J. Suppression effects in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acustica. 58:1985;57-63.
33. Tavartkiladze G.A., Frolenkov G.I., Artamasov S.V. Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission - role of the medial olivocochlear system. Acta Otolaryngol. 116:1996;213-218.
34. Tavartkiladze G.A., Frolenkov G.I., Kruglov A.V., Artamasov S.V. Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission. Br. J. Audiol. 28:1994;193-204.
35. Ueda H. Do click-evoked otoacoustic emissions have frequency specificity? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;306-310.
36. Veuillet E., Collet L., Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65:1991;724-735.
37. Wable J., Collet L. Can synchronized otoacoustic emissions really be attributed to SOAEs? Hear. Res. 80:1994;141-145.
38. Withnell R.H., Yates G.K. Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:1998;344-349.
39. Xu L., Probst R., Harris F.P., Roede J. Peripheral analysis of frequency in human ears revealed by tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 74:1994;173-180.
40. Yates G.K., Withnell R.H. Reply to Comment on 'Enhancement of the transient-evoked otoacoustic emission produced by the addition of a pure tone in the guinea pig' [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (1999) 105, 919-921]. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;922-924.
41. Yates G.K., Withnell R.H. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 136:1999;49-64.
42. Zwicker E. Delayed evoked oto-acoustic emissions and their suppression by Gaussian-shaped pressure impulses. Hear. Res. 11:1983;359-371.