Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences as a function of stimulus rate and level

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 121-128

  Hine, Jemma E ^a   Thornton, A Roger D ^a  

^a ROYAL SOUTH HANTS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COCHLEA; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0343307094     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199704000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Collet, L. (1993). Use of otoacoustic emissions to explore the medial olivocochlear system in humans. British Journal of Audiology, 27, 155-159.
2. Cope, Y., & Lutman, M. E. (1988). Otoacoustic emissions. In: B. McCormick (Ed.), Paediatric audiology 0-5 years (pp. 221-245). London: Taylor & Francis.
3. Elberling, C., & Don, M. (1984). Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scandinavian Audiology, 13, 187.
4. Engdahl, B., Arnesen, A. R., & Mair, I. W. S. (1994). Reproducibility and short-term variability of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scandinavian Audiology, 23, 99-104.
5. Grandori, F., & Ravazzani, P. (1990). Deconvolutions of evoked otoacoustic emissions and response nonlinearity. In F. Grandori, G. Cianfrone, & D. T. Kemp (Eds.), Cochlear mechanisms and otoacoustic emissions. Advances in Audiology (Vol. 7, pp. 99-109). Basel: Karger.
6. Grandori, F., & Ravazzani, P. (1993). Non-linearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the derived non-linear technique. British Journal of Audiology, 27, 97-102.
7. Grandori, F., Ravazzani, P., Tognola, G., & Hatzopoulos, S. (1994). "Derived nonlinear" versus "linear" click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. In F. Grandori, (Ed.), Advances in otoacoustic emissions: Fundamentals and clinical applications (Vol. 1, pp. 46-64). Milan: Casa Editrice G. Stefanoni-Lecco.
8. Kemp, D. T. (1978). Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 1386-1391.
9. Kemp, D. T., & Chum, R. (1980). Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 2, 213-232.
10. Lina-Granade, G., & Collet, L. (1995). Effect of interstimulus interval on evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research, 87, 55-61.
11. Lutman, M. E., & Sheppard, S. (1990). Quality estimation of click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions. Scandinavian Audiology, 19, 3-7.
12. Patuzzi, R. (1990). Mammalian cochlear function. In M. Rowe, & L. Aitkin (Eds.), Information processing in mammalian auditory and tactile systems (pp. 45-59). New York: Wiley-Liss.
13. Pickles, J. O. (1988). An introduction to the physiology of hearing (2nd edition). London: Academic Press.
14. Picton, T. W., Kellett, A. J. C., Vezsenyi, M., & Rabinovitch, D. E. (1993). Otoacoustic emissions recorded at rapid stimulus rates. Ear & Hearing, 14, 299-314.
15. Probst, R., Lonsbury-Martin, B. L., & Martin, G. K. (1991). A review of otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2027-2067.
16. Tavartkiladze, G. A., Frolenkov, G. I., & Artamasov, S. V. (1996). Ipsilateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emission: The role of the medial olivocochlear system. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 116, 213-218.
17. Tavartkiladze, G. A., Frolenkov, G. I., Kruglov, A. V., & Artamasov, S. V. (1994). Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission. In F. Grandori (Ed.), Advances in otoacoustic emissions: Suppression effects of otoacoustic emissions (Vol. 3, pp. 9-22). Milan: Casa Editrice G. Stefanoni-Lecco.
18. Thornton, A. R. D. (1993a). High rate otoacoustic emissions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 132-136.
19. Thornton, A. R. D. (1993b). Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions: new techniques and applications. British Journal of Audiology, 27, 109-115.
20. Thornton, A. R. D. (1994). Contralateral and ipsilateral "suppression" of the evoked otoacoustic emission at high stimulation rates. British Journal of Audiology, 28, 227-234.
21. Thornton, A. R. D., Folkard, T. J., & Chambers, J. D. (1994). Technical aspects of recording evoked otoacoustic emissions using maximum length sequences. Scandinavian Audiology, 23, 225-231.
22. Thornton, A. R. D., & Slaven, A. (1995). The effect of stimulus rate on the contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scandinavian Audiology, 24, 83-90.
23. Thornton, A. R. D., Slaven, A., MacKenzie, I., & Phillips, A. J. (1994) Evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded at very high stimulation rates. In F. Grandori (Ed.), Advances in otoacoustic emissions: Fundamentals and clinical applications (Vol. 1. pp. 28-35) Milan: Casa Editrice G. Stefanoni-Lecco.
24. Veuillet E., Collet, L., & Duclaux, R. (1991). Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: Dependence on stimulus variables. Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 724-735.
25. Warr, W. B. (1992). Organization of olivocochlear efferent systems in mammals. In D. B. Webster, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), The mammalian auditory pathway: Neuroanatomy (pp. 410-448). New York: Springer-Verlag.