Relationship between steady-state and induced gamma activity to motion

NeuroReport

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 625-630

  Krishnan, Giri P ^a   Skosnik, Patrick D ^a   Vohs, Jenifer L ^a   Busey, Thomas A ^a   O'Donnell, Brian F ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electroencephalogram; Induced activity; Motion; Random dot kinematograms; Steady state activity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CINERADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; GAMMA RHYTHM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; TIME; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 17844392589     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200504250-00022     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Zeki SM. Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey. Nature 1978; 274:423-428.
2. van Essen DC, Anderson CH, Felleman DJ. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science 1992; 255:419-423.
3. Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 1999; 24:49-65.
4. von der Malsburg C. The what and why of binding: the modeler's perspective. Neuron 1999; 24:95-104.
5. Engel AK, Roelfsema PR, Fries P, Brecht M, Singer W. Role of the temporal domain for response selection and perceptual binding. Cereb Cortex 1997; 7:571-582.
6. Gray CM, Viana Di Frisco G. Stimulus-dependent neuronal oscillations and local synchronization in striate cortex of the alert cat. J Neurosci 1997; 17:3239-3253.
7. König P, Engel AK, Singer W. Relation between oscillatory activity and long-range synchronization in cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:290-294.
8. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Pernier J. Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J Neurosci 1996; 16:4240-4249.
9. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Adam C, Hasboun D, Varela FJ. A quantitative study of gamma-band activity in human intracranial recordings triggered by visual stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 2000; 12:2608-2622.
10. Müller MM, Junghöfer M, Elbert T, Rochstroh B. Visually induced gamma-band responses to coherent and incoherent motion: a replication study. Neuroreport 1997; 8:2575-2579.
11. Lutzenberger W, Pulvermüller F, Elbert T, Birbaumer N. Visual stimulation alters local 40-Hz responses in humans: an EEG-study. Neurosci Lett 1995; 183:39-42.
12. Regan D. Human Brain Electrophysiology: Evoked Potentials and Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. New York: Elsevier Publishers; 1989.
13. Snowden RJ, Ullrich D, Bach M. Isolation and characteristics of a steady-state visually-evoked potential in humans related to the motion of a stimulus. Vision Res 1995; 35:1365-1373.
14. Smith AT, Snowden RJ, Milne AB. Is global motion really based on spatial integration of local motion signals? Vision Res 1994; 34:2425-2430.
15. Brecht M, Goebel R, Singer W, Engel AK. Synchronization of visual responses in the superior colliculus of awake cats. Neuroreport 2001; 12:43-47.
16. Kruse W, Hoffmann KP. Fast gamma oscillations in areas MT and MST occur during visual stimulation, but not during visually guided manual tracking. Exp Brain Res 2002; 147:360-373.
17. Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 55:468-484.
18. Siegel M, Donner TH, Oostenveld R, Fries P, Engel AK. Dependency of high-frequency neuronal oscillations in human area MT + on visual motion strength: an MEG study. Program no. 935.4. Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience; 2004.
19. Bertrand O, Tallon-Baudry C. Oscillatory gamma activity in humans: a possible role for object representation. Int J Psychophysiol 2000; 38:211-223.
20. Snowden RJ, Treue S, Erickson RG, Andersen RA. The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion. J Neurosci 1991; 11:2768-2785.
21. Andersen RA. Neural mechanisms of visual motion perception in primates. Neuron 1997; 18:865-872.
22. Heeger DJ, Boynton GM, Demb JB, Seidemann E, Newsome WT. Motion opponency in visual cortex. J Neurosci 1999; 19:7162-7174.
23. Muckli L, Singer W, Zanella FE, Goebel R. Integration of multiple motion vectors over space: an fMRI study of transparent motion perception. Neuroimage 2002; 16:843-856.