Development of a new cultivar-discrimination method based on DNA polymorphism in a vegetatively propagated crop

Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 65-69

  Okamoto, Hiroyuki ^a   Takamiya, Tomoko ^a,b   Saito, Akira ^c   Domon, Eiji ^c   Iimure, Kazuhiko ^d   Tomioka, Keisuke ^a   Kawase, Makoto ^a   Ohtake, Yuhko ^a   Murakami, Yasufumi ^b   Okuizumi, Hisato ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AGROBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER FOR KYUSHU OKINAWA REGION   (Japan)

^d Kumamoto Prefectural Agricultural Research Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

DNA marker; Mat rush; RLGS; Seeds and Seedlings Law

Indexed keywords

JUNCUS EFFUSUS;

EID: 33746696597     PISSN: 00213551     EISSN: 00213551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6090/jarq.40.65     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Asakawa, J. et al. (1995) Quantitative and qualitative genetic variation in two-dimensional DNA gels of human lymphocytoid cell lines. Electrophoresis, 16, 241-252.
2. Blair, M. W., Panaud, O. & McCouch, S. R. (1999) Intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification for analysis of microsatellite motif frequency and fingerprinting in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet., 98, 780-792.
3. Bowers, J. et al. (1999) Historical genetics: The parentage of Chardonnay, Gamay, and other wine grapes of Northeastern France. Science, 285, 1562-1565.
4. Cho, Y. G. et al. (1996) Cloning and mapping of variety-specific rice genomic DNA sequences: amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Genome, 39, 373-378.
5. Hanada, H. et al. (2003) Digoxigenin (DIG)-based AFLP analysis of three citrus cultivars. JARQ, 37, 225-228.
6. Hattori, N. et al. (2004) Preference of DNA methyltransferases for CpG islands in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Res., 14, 1733-1740.
7. Hayashizaki, Y. et al. (1993) Restriction landmark genomic scanning method and its various applications. Electrophoresis, 14, 251-258.
8. Iketani, H. et al. (1998) Incongruence between RFLPs of chloroplast DNA and morphological classification in east Asian pear (Pyrus spp.). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 45, 533-539.
9. Kawase, M. (1994) Application of the restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) method to rice cultivars as a new fingerprinting technique. Theor. Appl. Genet., 89, 861-864.
10. Kimura, T. et al. (2002) Identification of Asian pear varieties by SSR analysis. Breed. Sci., 52, 115-121.
11. Miyao, A. et al. (1996) Characterization and genetic mapping of simple sequence repeats in the rice genome. DNA Res., 3, 233-238.
12. Muraji, M. et al. (2004) Discrimination among Japanese species of the Orius flower bugs (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) based on PCR-RFLP of the nuclear and mitochondrial DNAs. JARQ, 38, 91-95.
13. Murray, M. G. & Thompson, W. F. (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res., 8, 4321-4325.
14. Nasu, S. et al. (2002) Search for and analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in rice (Oryza sativa, Oryza rufipogon) and establishment of SNP markers. DNA Res., 9, 163-171.
15. Ohsumi, T. et al. (1995) Loss of heterozygosity in chromosomes 1, 5, 7 and 13 in mouse hepatoma detected by systematic genome-wide scanning using RLGS genetic map. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 212, 632-639.
16. Okuizumi, H. et al. (1994) Application of the RLGS method to large-size genomes using a restriction trapper. DNA Res., 1, 99-102.
17. Okuizumi, H. et al. (1995a) Genetic mapping of restriction landmark genomic scanning loci in the mouse. Electrophoresis, 16, 233-240.
18. Okuizumi, H. et al. (1995b) A single gel analysis of 575 dominant and codominant restriction landmark genomic scanning loci in mice interspecific backcross progeny. Electrophoresis, 16, 253-260.
19. Rouillard, J. M. et al. (2001) Virtual genome scan: a tool for restriction landmark-based scanning of the human genome. Genome Res., 11, 1453-1459.
20. Tomioka, K. & Sato, T. (2001) Restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) in fungi. Mycoscience, 42, 295-299.