Evaluation of a two-stage neural model of glaucomatous defect: An approach to reduce test-retest variability

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 499-511

  Pan, Fei ^a   Swanson, William H ^a,b   Dul, Mitchell W ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromatic; Gabor; Perimetry; Ricco's area; Spatial vision; Test retest variability

Indexed keywords

CELLS; DISEASES; PATIENT TREATMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CHROMATIC; GABOR; PERIMETRY; RICCO'S AREA; SPATIAL VISION; TEST-RETEST VARIABILITY;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLOSED ANGLE GLAUCOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MODEL; NERVE CELL LESION; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA NERVE CELL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STIMULUS; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

COLOR PERCEPTION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33746648696     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000225091.60457.f4     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Swanson WH, Felius J, Pan F. Perimetric defects and ganglion cell damage: interpreting linear relations using a two-stage neural model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:466-72.
2. Thylefors B, Negrel AD. The global impact of glaucoma. Bull World Health Organ 1994;72:323-6.
3. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:389-93.
4. Coleman AL. Glaucoma. Lancet 1999;354:1803-10.
5. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:130-5.
6. Piltz JR, Starita RJ. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:109-11.
7. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2654-9.
8. Johnson CA. Psychophysical measurement of glaucomatous damage. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45(suppl 3):S313-8.
9. House PH, Cooper RL, Bulsara M. Comparing long-term variability using the Humphrey Field Analyzer and the ring perimeter in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. In: Mills RP, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 1992/1993. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1993:63-71.
10. Chauhan BC, House PH. Intratest variability in conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry. Ophthalmology 1991;98:79-83.
11. Pearson P, Swanson WH, Fellman RL. Chromatic and achromatic defects in patients with progressing glaucoma. Vision Res 2001;41:1215-27.
12. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1404-10.
13. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:648-56.
14. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:2451-7.
15. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-9.
16. Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L, Lee AC, Kono Y, Weinreb RN. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:309-13.
17. Gilpin LB, Stewart WC, Hunt HH, Broom CD. Threshold variability using different Goldmann stimulus sizes. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1990;68:674-6.
18. Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;38:426-35.
19. Felius J, Swanson WH, Fellman RL, Lynn JR, Starita RJ. Spatial summation for selected ganglion cell mosaics in patients with glaucoma. In: Wall M, ed. Perimetry Update 1996/1997. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1997:213-21.
20. Fellman RL, Lynn JR, Starita RJ, Swanson WH. Clinical importance of spatial summation in glaucoma. In: Heijl A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/1989: Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting; Vancouver (Canada); May 9-12, 1988. Berkeley: Kugler & Ghedini; 1989:313-24.
21. Wilensky JT, Mermelstein JR, Siegel HG. The use of different-sized stimuli in automated perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;101:710-3.
22. Goldmann H. Fundamentals of exact perimetry. 1945. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:599-604.
23. Derrington AM, Lennie P. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. J Physiol 1984;357:219-40.
24. Crook JM, Lange-Malecki B, Lee BB, Valberg A. Visual resolution of macaque retinal ganglion cells. J Physiol 1988;396:205-24.
25. Croner LJ, Kaplan E. Receptive fields of P and M ganglion cells across the primate retina. Vision Res 1995;35:7-24.
26. Sjostrand J, Olsson V, Popovic Z, Conradi N. Quantitative estimations of foveal and extra-foveal retinal circuitry in humans. Vision Res 1999;39:2987-98.
27. Lee BB. Receptive field structure in the primate retina. Vision Res 1996;36:631-44.
28. Lee BB, Kremers J, Yeh T. Receptive fields of primate retinal ganglion cells studied with a novel technique. Vis Neurosci 1998;15:161-75.
29. Quick RF Jr. A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. Kybernetik 1974;16:65-7.
30. Robson JG, Graham N. Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Res 1981;21:409-18.
31. Meese TS, Williams CB. Probability summation for multiple patches of luminance modulation. Vision Res 2000;40:2101-13.
32. Quigley HA, Nickells RW, Kerrigan LA, Pease ME, Thibault DJ, Zack DJ. Retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma and after axotomy occurs by apoptosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:774-86.
33. Henson DB, Evans J, Chauhan BC, Lane C. Influence of fixation accuracy on threshold variability in patients with open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:444-50.
34. Swanson WH, Birch EE. Extracting thresholds from noisy psychophysical data. Percept Psychophys 1992;51:409-22.
35. Dacey DM, Lee BB. Functional architecture of cone signal pathways in the primate retina. In: Gegenfurtner KR, Sharpe LT, eds. Color Vision: From Genes to Perception. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999:181-202.
36. Anderson RS. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25:79-97.
37. Johnson MA. Color vision in the peripheral retina. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986;63:97-103.
38. Dacey DM. The mosaic of midget ganglion cells in the human retina. J Neurosci 1993;13:5334-55.
39. Smith VC, Pokorny J. Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Res 1975;15:161-71.
40. Smith VC, Pokorny J. The design and use of a cone chromaticity space: a tutorial. Color Res Appl 1996;21:375-83.
41. Anderson DR. Automated Static Perimetry. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1992.
42. Pearson PM, Swanson WH. Chromatic contrast sensitivity: the role of absolute threshold and gain constant in differences between the fovea and the periphery. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2000;17:232-43.
43. Graham N, Hood DC. Modeling the dynamics of light adaptation: the merging of two traditions. Vision Res 1992;32:1373-93.
44. Merigan WH, Maunsell JH. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Annu Rev Neurosci 1993;16:369-402.
45. Wetherill GB, Levitt H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1965;18:1-10.
46. Heijl A, Krakau CE. An automatic static perimeter, design and pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1975;53:293-310.
47. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:689.
48. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
49. Harwerth RS, Crawford ML, Frishman LJ, Viswanathan S, Smith EL 3rd, Carter-Dawson L. Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2002;21:91-125.
50. Garway-Heath DF, Holder GE, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Relationship between electrophysiological, psychophysical, and anatomical measurements in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:2213-20.
51. Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd, Chandler M. Progressive visual field defects from experimental glaucoma: measurements with white and colored stimuli. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:558-70.
52. Greenstein VC, Halevy D, Zaidi Q, Koenig KL, Ritch RH. Chromatic and luminance systems deficits in glaucoma. Vision Res 1996;36:621-9.
53. McKendrick AM, Badcock DR, Morgan WH. Psychophysical measurement of neural adaptation abnormalities in magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:1846-53.
54. Watson AB. Estimation of local spatial scale. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1987;4:1579-82.
55. Swanson WH, Birch EE. Infant spatiotemporal vision: dependence of spatial contrast sensitivity on temporal frequency. Vision Res 1990;30:1033-48.
56. Wild JM, Wood JM, Barnes DA. The cortical representation of gradient-adapted multiple-stimulus perimetry. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1986;6:401-5.
57. Frisen L. High-pass resolution perimetry: central-field neuroretinal correlates. Vision Res 1995;35:293-301.
58. Johnson CA. Selective versus nonselective losses in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1994;3:S32-S44.