Defining the nature of motion perception deficits in glaucoma using simple and complex motion stimuli

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 466-472

  Karwatsky, Peter ^a   Bertone, Armando ^a   Overbury, Olga ^b   Faubert, Jocelyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cortical damage; First order; Glaucoma; Motion; Motion perimetry; Second order

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT TREATMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CORTICAL DAMAGE; FIRST-ORDER; GLAUCOMA; MOTION; MOTION PERIMETRY; SECOND-ORDER;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDOPHAKIA; STIMULUS;

AGED; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33746629425     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000225107.38719.0d     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Gupta N, Yucel YH. Brain changes in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003;13 (suppl 3):S32-5.
2. Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, Kaufman PL, Gupta N. Effects of retinal ganglion cell loss on magno-, parvo-, koniocellular pathways in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 2003;22:465-81.
3. Crawford ML, Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd, Mills S, Ewing B. Experimental glaucoma in primates: changes in cytochrome oxidase blobs in V1 cortex. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:358-64.
4. Crawford ML, Harwerth RS, Smith EL 3rd, Shen F, Carter-Dawson L. Glaucoma in primates: cytochrome oxidase reactivity in parvo- and magnocellular pathways. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1791-802.
5. Vickers JC, Hof PR, Schumer RA, Wang RF, Podos SM, Morrison JH. Magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways are both affected in a macaque monkey model of glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997;25:239-43.
6. Stewart WC, Chauhan BC. Newer visual function tests in the evaluation of glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1995;40:119-35.
7. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR. Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:484-91.
8. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology 1988;95:357-63.
9. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:453-64.
10. Livingstone M, Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 1988;240:740-9.
11. Morgan JE, Uchida H, Caprioli J. Retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:303-10.
12. Morgan JE. Retinal ganglion cell shrinkage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002;11:365-70.
13. Yucel YH, Zhang Q, Gupta N, Kaufman PL, Weinreb RN. Loss of neurons in magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:378-84.
14. Bielik M, Zwas F, Shin DH, Tsai CS. PERG and spectral sensitivity in ocular hypertensive and chronic open-angle glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1991;229:401-5.
15. Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Early magnocellular loss in glaucoma demonstrated using the pseudorandomly stimulated flash visual evoked potential. J Glaucoma 1999;8:140-8.
16. Tyler CW. Specific deficits of flicker sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;20:204-12.
17. Velten IM, Korth M, Horn FK, Budde WM. Temporal contrast sensitivity with peripheral and central stimulation in glaucoma diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:199-205.
18. Faubert J, Balazsi GA, Brussell EM, Overbury O. Multi-flash campimetry and other psychophysical tests in glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1987;49:425-32.
19. Faubert J, Balazsi AG, Muermans M, Brussell EM, Kasner OP. Multi-flash campimetry and optic nerve structure in early chronic open angle glaucoma. In: Heiji A, ed. Perimetry Update 1988/89: Proceedings of the VIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting; Vancouver, Canada; May 9-12, 1988. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1999:349-58.
20. Casson EJ, Johnson CA, Nelson-Quigg JM. Temporal modulation perimetry: the effects of aging and eccentricity on sensitivity in normals. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3096-102.
21. Westcott MC, Fitzke FW, Crabb DP, Hitchings RA. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves for a motion stimulus in glaucoma eyes, glaucoma suspect eyes, and normal eyes. Vision Res 1999;39:631-9.
22. Neima D, LeBlanc R, Regan D. Visual field defects in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1042-5.
23. Merigan WH. P and M pathway specialization in the macaque. In: Valberg A, Lee BB, eds. Pigments to Perception: Advances in Understanding Visual Processes. New York: Plenum Press; 1991:117-25.
24. Merigan WH, Katz LM, Maunsell JH. The effects of parvocellular lateral geniculate lesions on the acuity and contrast sensitivity of macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 1991;11:994-1001.
25. Silverman SE, Trick GL, Hart WM Jr. Motion perception is abnormal in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:722-9.
26. Joffe KM, Raymond JE, Chrichton A. Motion coherence perimetry in glaucoma and suspected glaucoma. Vision Res 1997;37:955-64.
27. Wall M, Jennisch CS. Random dot motion stimuli are more sensitive than light stimuli for detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension patients. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:550-7.
28. Giaschi DE, Trope GE, Kothe AC, Hong XH. Loss of sensitivity to motion-defined form in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1996;13:707-15.
29. Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Perimetric motion thresholds are elevated in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients. Vision Res 1997;37:1989-97.
30. Shabana N, Cornilleau Peres V, Carkeet A, Chew PT. Motion perception in glaucoma patients: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 2003;48:92-106.
31. Movshon JA, Newsome WT. Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 1996;16:7733-41.
32. Watamaniuk SN, Sekuler R, Williams DW. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: the integration of direction information. Vision Res 1989;29:47-59.
33. Faubert J. Visual perception and aging. Can J Exp Psychol 2002;56:164-76.
34. Habak C, Faubert J. Larger effect of aging on the perception of higher-order stimuli. Vision Res 2000;40:943-50.
35. Trick GL, Silverman SE. Visual sensitivity to motion: age-related changes and deficits in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology 1991;41:1437-40.
36. Silverman SE, Tran B, Zimmerman KM, Feldon SE. Dissociation between the detection and perception of motion in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1994;44:1814-8.
37. Gilmore GC, Wenk HE, Naylor LA, Koss E. Motion perception and Alzheimer's disease. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1994;49:52-7.
38. O'Brien HL, Tetewsky SJ, Avery LM, Cushman LA, Makous W, Duffy CJ. Visual mechanisms of spatial disorientation in Alzheimer's disease. Cereb Cortex 2001;11:1083-92.
39. Mapstone M, Steffenella TM, Duffy CJ. A visuospatial variant of mild cognitive impairment: getting lost between aging and AD. Neurology 2003;60:802-8.
40. Chubb C, Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1988;5:1986-2007.
41. Wilson HR, Ferrera P, Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Vis Neurosci 1992;9:79-97.
42. Nishida S, Ledgeway T, Edwards M. Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system. Vision Res 1997;37:2685-98.
43. Bertone A, Faubert J. How is complex second-order motion processed? Vision Res 2003;43:2591-601.
44. Allard R, Faubert J. Same calculation efficiency but different internal noise for luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli detection. J Vision 2006;6:322-34. Available at: http://journalofvision.org/6/4/3/. Accessed April 3, 2006.
45. van Santen JP, Sperling G. Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1984;1:451-73.
46. Adelson EH, Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1985;2:284-99.
47. van Santen JP, Sperling G. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J Opt Soc Am A 1985;2:300-21.
48. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ Jr. Model of human visual-motion sensing. J Opt Soc Am A 1985;2:322-41.
49. Baker CL Jr. Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1999;9:461-6.
50. Baker CL Jr, Mareschal I. Processing of second-order stimuli in the visual cortex. Prog Brain Res 2001;134:171-91.
51. Dumoulin SO, Baker CL Jr, Hess RF, Evans AC. Cortical specialization for processing first- and second-order motion. Cereb Cortex 2003;13:1375-85.
52. Smith AT, Greenlee MW, Singh KD, Kraemer FM, Hennig J. The processing of first- and second-order motion in human visual cortex assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). J Neurosci 1998;18:3816-30.
53. Cavanagh P, Mather G. Motion: the long and short of it. Spat Vis 1989;4:103-29.
54. Bertone A, Mottron L, Jelenic P, Faubert J. Motion perception in autism: a 'complex' issue. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15:218-25.
55. Bertone A, Mottron L, Jelenic P, Faubert J. Enhanced and diminished visuo-spatial information processing in autism depends on stimulus complexity. Brain 2005;128:2430-41.
56. Kogan CS, Bertone A, Cornish K, Boutet I, Der Kaloustian VM, Andermann E, Faubert J, Chaudhuri A. Integrative cortical dysfunction and pervasive motion perception deficit in fragile X syndrome. Neurology 2004;63:1634-9.
57. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951;18:292-7.
58. Nguyen-Tri D, Overbury O, Faubert J. The role of lenticular senescence in age-related color vision changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:3698-704.
59. Karwatsky P, Overbury O, Faubert J. Red-green chromatic mechanisms in normal aging and glaucomatous observers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:2861-6.
60. Weale RA. The Aging Eye. London: HK Lewis; 1963.
61. Wu J, Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R. Impaired motion sensitivity as a predictor of subsequent field loss in glaucoma suspects: the Ros-common Glaucoma Study. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:534-7.
62. Weale RA. Aging and vision. Vision Res 1986;26:1507-12.
63. Spear PD. Neural bases of visual deficits during aging. Vision Res 1993;33:2589-609.
64. Faubert J, Bellavance F. Temporal modulation visual fields, normal aging, Parkinson's disease and methyl-mercury in the James Bay Cree: a feasibility study. Ar Qbras Oftalmol 2003;66:77-91. Available at: http://www.abonet.com.br/ abo/665/abo66509.htm. Accessed April 3, 2006.
65. Wist ER, Schrauf M, Ehrenstein WH. Dynamic vision based on motion-contrast: changes with age in adults. Exp Brain Res 2000;134:295-300.
66. Mendelson JR, Wells EF. Age-related changes in the visual cortex. Vision Res 2002;42:695-703.
67. Ansari EA, Morgan JE, Snowden RJ. Glaucoma: squaring the psychophysics and neurobiology. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:823-6.
68. Willis A, Anderson SJ. Effects of glaucoma and aging on photopic and scotopic motion perception. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:325-35.