Integrative cortical dysfunction and pervasive motion perception deficit in fragile X syndrome

Neurology

Volumn 63, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1634-1639

  Kogan, C S ^a   Bertone, A ^b   Cornish, K ^a   Boutet, I ^a   Der Kaloustian, V M ^a   Andermann, E ^c   Faubert, J ^b   Chaudhuri, A ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FRAGILE X SYNDROME; GIANT CELL; HUMAN; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT; LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS; LUMINANCE; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEOCORTEX; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PARIETAL LOBE; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 8644228598     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000142987.44035.3B     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Turner G, Webb T, Wake S, Robinson H. Prevalence of fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1996;64:196-197.
2. Verkerk AJ, Pieretti M, Sutcliffe JS, et al. Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome. Cell 1991;65:905-914.
3. Fu YH, Kuhl DP, Pizzuti A, et al. Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox. Cell 1991;67:1047-1058.
4. Loesch DZ, Huggins RM, Bui QM, et al. Effect of fragile X status categories and FMRP deficits on cognitive profiles estimated by robust pedigree analysis. Am J Med Genet 2003;122A:13-23.
5. Loesch DZ, Huggins RM, Bui QM, Epstein JL, Taylor AK, Hagerman RJ. Effect of the deficits of fragile X mental retardation protein on cognitive status of fragile X males and females assessed by robust pedigree analysis. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2002;23:416-423.
6. Cornish K, Sudhalter V, Turk J. Attention and language in fragile X. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2004;10:11-16.
7. Crowe SF, Hay DA. Neuropsychological dimensions of the fragile X syndrome: support for a non-dominant hemisphere dysfunction hypothesis. Neuropsychologia 1990;28:9-16.
8. Freund LS, Reiss AL. Cognitive profiles associated with the fra(X) syndrome in males and females. Am J Med Genet 1991;38:542-547.
9. Cornish KM, Munir F, Cross G. Spatial cognition in males with Fragile-X syndrome: evidence for a neuropsychological phenotype. Cortex 1999;35:263-271.
10. Kogan CS, Beutet I, Cornish K, et al. Differential impact of the FMR1 gene on visual processing in fragile X syndrome. Brain 2004;127(Pt 3):591-601.
11. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The visual brain in action. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
12. Vidyasagar TR. From attentional gating in macaque primary visual cortex to dyslexia in humans. Prog Brain Res 2001;134:297-312.
13. Le S, Cardebat D, Boulanouar K, et al. Seeing, since childhood, without ventral stream: a behavioural study. Brain 2002;125(Pt 1):58-74.
14. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA. Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways. Trends Neurosci 1983;6:414-417.
15. Chubb C, Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. J Opt Soc Am A 1988;5:1986-2007.
16. Bertone A, Faubert J. How is complex second-order motion processed? Vision Res 2003;43:2591-2601.
17. Nishida S, Ledgeway T, Edwards M. Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system. Vision Res 1997;37:2685-2698.
18. Sperling G, Chubb C, Solomon JA, Lu ZL. Full-wave and half-wave processes in second-order motion and texture. Ciba Found Symp 1994;184:287-303; discussion 303-288, 330-288.
19. Wilson HR, Ferrera VP, Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Vis Neurosci 1992;9:79-97.
20. Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - revised. Minnesota: American Guidance Service, 1981.
21. Dunn LM, Thériault-Whalen CM, Dunn LM. Échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Minnesota: American Guidance Service, 1993.
22. Ledgeway T, Smith AT. Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision. Vision Res 1994;34:2727-2740.
23. Bertone A, Mottron L, Jelenic P, Faubert J. Motion perception in autism: a "complex" issue. J Cogn Neurosci 2003;15:218-225.
24. Weibull W. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 1951;18:292-297.
25. Clifford CW, Vaina LM. A computational model of selective deficits in first and second-order motion processing. Vision Res 1999;39:113-130.
26. Smith AT, Greenlee MW, Singh KD, Kraemer FM, Hennig J. The processing of first- and second-order motion in human visual cortex assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). J Neurosci 1998;18:3816-3830.
27. Wilson HR. Non-Fourier cortical processes in texture, form, and motion. In: Ulinski PSaJ, EG, ed. Cerebral cortex: models of cortical circuitry. New York: Plenum, 1998.
28. Habak C, Faubert J. Larger effect of aging on the perception of higher-order stimuli. Vision Res 2000;40:943-950.
29. Spear PD. Neural bases of visual deficits during aging. Vision Res 1993;33:2589-2609.
30. Weale RA. Senile changes in visual acuity. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1975;95:36-38.
31. Spencer J, O'Brien J, Riggs K, Braddick O, Atkinson J, Wattam-Bell J. Motion processing in autism: evidence for a dorsal stream deficiency. Neuroreport 2000;11:2765-2767.
32. Atkinson J, King J, Braddick O, Nokes L, Anker S, Braddick F. A specific deficit of dorsal stream function in Williams' syndrome. Neuroreport 1997;8:1919-1922.
33. Hansen PC, Stein JF, Orde SR, Winter JL, Talcott JB. Are dyslexics' visual deficits limited to measures of dorsal stream function? Neuroreport 2001;12:1527-1530.
34. Gunn A, Cory E, Atkinson J, et al. Dorsal and ventral stream sensitivity in normal development and hemiplegia. Neuroreport 2002;13:843-847.
35. Braddick O, Atkinson J, Wattam-Bell J. Normal and anomalous development of visual motion processing: motion coherence and 'dorsal-stream vulnerability.' Neuropsychologia 2003;41:1769-1784.