The economics of performance management in nonprofit organizations

Nonprofit Management and Leadership

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 267-281

  Speckbacher, Gerhard ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746606096     PISSN: 10486682     EISSN: 15427854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nml.15     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alchian, A. A., and Demsetz, H., “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” American Economic Review, 1972, 62, 777-795.
2. Alchian, A. A., and Woodward, S., “The Firm Is Dead; Long Live the Firm: A Review of Oliver E. Williamson’s TheEconomic Institutions of Capitalism.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1988, 26 (1), 65-79.
3. Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., and Wells, R. B., “A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement.” Sloan Management Review, 1997, 38 (3), 25-37.
4. Brickley, J. A., and Van Horn, R. L., “Incentives in Nonprofit Organizations: Evidence from Hospitals.” Working paper no. FR 00-02, Financial Research and Policy, Bradley Policy Research Center, University ofRochester, Rochester, N.Y., 2000.
5. Chow, C. W., “The Balanced Scorecard: A Potent Tool for Energizing and Focusing Healthcare OrganizationManagement.” Journal of Healthcare Management, 1998, 43 (3), 263-280.
6. Coase, R., “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, 1937, 4 (16), 386-405.
7. Coase, R., “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 3 (1), 1-44.
8. Drucker, P., “What Business Can Learn from Nonprofits.” Harvard Business Review, July-Aug. 1989.
9. Forgione, D. A., “Health Care Financial and Quality Measures: International Call for a ‘BalancedScorecard’ Approach.” Journal of Health Care Finance, 1997, 24 (1), 55-58.
10. Freeman, R. E., and McVea, J., “A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management.” In M. A.Hitt, R. E.Freeman, and J. S.Harrison (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 2001.
11. Gibbons, R., “Incentives in Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12 (4), 115-132.
12. Grossman, S., and Hart, O., “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and LateralIntegration.” Journal of Political Economy, 1986, 94 (4), 691-719.
13. Haine, S. F., “Measuring the Mission: Using a Scorecard Approach in Not-for-ProfitOrganizations.” Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, 1999, 3 (2), 13-19.
14. Hansmann, H., The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1996.
15. Hansmann, H., “Ownership of the Firm.” In P.Newman (ed.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. London: Macmillan, 1998.
16. Hart, O. D., and Moore, J., “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98, 1119-1158.
17. Herzlinger, R. E., “Can Public Trust in Nonprofits and Governments Be Restored?" Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr. 1996.
18. Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H., “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3, 305-360.
19. Kaplan, R. S., “Strategic Performance Measurement and Management in Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2001, 11 (3), 353-370.
20. Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P., “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review, 1992, 70 (1), 71-79.
21. Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P., The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996.
22. Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P., The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2001.
23. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, J. R., Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
24. Moss Kanter, R., and Summers, D. V., “Doing Well While Doing Good: Dilemmas of Performance Measurement in Nonprofit Organizations and theNeed for a Multi-Constituency Approach.” In W. W.Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1987.
25. Norreklit, H., “The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of ItsAssumptions.” Management Accounting Review, 2000, 11, 65-88.
26. Osterloh, M., and Frey, B. S., “Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms.” Organization Science, 2000, 11 (5), 538-550.
27. Porter, M. E., “What Is Strategy?" Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec.1996.
28. Prendergast, C., “The Provision of Incentives in Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1999, 37 (1), 7-63.
29. Prendergast, C., and Topel, R., “Discretion and Bias in Performance Evaluation.” European Economic Review, 1993, 37, 355-365.
30. Preston, A., “The Nonprofit Worker in a For-Profit World.” Journal of Labor Economics, 1989, 7 (4), 438-463.
31. Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L., “Power in a Theory of the Firm.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, 113 (2), 387-432.
32. Roomkin, M., and Weisbrod, B., “Managerial Compensation and Incentives in For-Profit and NonprofitHospitals.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1999, 15, 750-781.
33. Rose-Ackerman, S., “Altruism, Nonprofits, and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Literature, 1996, 34, 701-728.
34. Salamon, L. M., and Anheier, H. K., The Emerging Nonprofit Sector. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996.
35. Shleifer, A., “State Versus Private Ownership.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, 12 (4), 133-150.
36. Weisbrod, B., “Nonprofit and Proprietary Sector Behavior: Wage Differentials Among Lawyers.” Journal of Labor Economics, 1983, 1 (3), 246-263.
37. Williamson, O. E., “Organizational Form, Residual Claimants, and Corporate Control.” Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26 (1), 351-366.
38. Williamson, O. E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press, 1985.
39. Zingales, L., “Corporate Governance.” In P.Newman (ed.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. London: Macmillan, 1998.