Technique for intraoperative use of pedography

Techniques in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 88-100

  Richter, Martinus ^a   Frink, Michael ^a   Zech, Stefan ^a   Geerling, Jens ^a   Droste, Patrizia ^a   Knobloch, Karsten ^a   Krettek, Christian ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanical assessment; Force distribution; Intraoperative pedography (IP); Operative technique; Pedography

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; FOOT; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; PATIENT MONITORING; PEDOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 33746601422     PISSN: 15360644     EISSN: 15381943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00132587-200606000-00006     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Alexander IJ, Chao EY, Johnson KA. The assessment of dynamic foot-to-ground contact forces and plantar pressure distribution: a review of the evolution of current techniques and clinical applications. Foot Ankle. 1990;11:152-167.
2. Becker HP, Rosenbaum D, Zeithammer G, et al. Gait pattern analysis after ankle ligament reconstruction (modified Evans procedure). Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:477-482.
3. Cavanagh PR, Ulbrecht JS, Caputo GM. Elevated plantar pressure and ulceration in diabetic patients after panmetatarsal head resection: two case reports. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:521-526.
4. Cavanagh PR, Henley JD. The computer era in gait analysis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1993;10:471-484.
5. Rosenbaum D, Engelhardt M, Becker HP, et al. Clinical and functional outcome after anatomic and nonanatomic ankle ligament reconstruction: Evans tenodesis versus periosteal flap. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:636-639.
6. Zwipp H. Chirurgie des Fusses. Berlin: Springer; 1994.
7. Adelaar RS, Kyles MK. Surgical correction of resistant talipes equinovarus: observations and analysis-preliminary report. Foot Ankle. 1981;2:126-137.
8. Coetzee JC, Hansen ST. Surgical management of severe deformity resulting from posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:944-949.
9. Marti RK, de Heus JA, Roolker W, et al. Subtalar arthrodesis with correction of deformity after fractures of the os calcis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:611-616.
10. Mosier-LaClair S, Pomeroy G, Manoli A. Operative treatment of the difficult stage 2 adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6:95-119.
11. Sammarco GJ, Conti SF. Surgical treatment of neuroarthropathic foot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:102-109.
12. Stephens HM, Walling AK, Solmen JD, et al. Subtalar repositional arthrodesis for adult acquired flatfoot. Clin Orthop. 1999:69-73.
13. Toolan BC, Sangeorzan BJ, Hansen ST Jr. Complex reconstruction for the treatment of dorsolateral peritalar subluxation of the foot. Early results after distraction arthrodesis of the calcaneocuboid joint in conjunction with stabilization of, and transfer of the flexor digitorum longus tendon to, the midfoot to treat acquired pes planovalgus in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1545-1560.
14. Wei SY, Sullivan RJ, Davidson RS. Talo-navicular arthrodesis for residual midfoot deformities of a previously corrected clubfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21:482-485.
15. Koczewski P, Shadi M, Napiontek M. Foot lengthening using the Ilizarov device: the transverse tarsal joint resection versus osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2002;11:68-72.
16. Richter M, Geerling J, Zech S, et al. Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging with a motorized mobile C-arm (SIREMOBIL ISO-C-3D) in foot and ankle trauma care: a preliminary report. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:259-266.
17. Richter M. Experimental comparison between computer assisted surgery (CAS) based and C-arm based correction of hind- and midfoot deformities. Osteosynth Trauma Care. 2003;11:29-34.
18. Zwipp H. Biomechanik der Sprunggelenke. Unfallchirurg. 1989;92:98-102.
19. Rosenbaum D, Becker HP, Sterk J, et al. Functional evaluation of the 10-year outcome after modified Evans repair for chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:765-771.
20. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM, Iiboshi A. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:262-276.
21. Richter M. Foot and ankle surgery: today and in the future. In: 5th Congress of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS); April 29-May 1, 2004; Montpellier. Abstracts.
22. Khalafi A, Landsman AS, Lautenschlager EP, et al. Plantar forefoot pressure changes after second metatarsal neck osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:550-555.
23. Roukis TS. Central metatarsal head-neck osteotomies: indications and operative techniques. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2005;22:197-222, vi.
24. Snyder J, Owen J, Wayne J, et al. Plantar pressure and load in cadaver feet after a Weil or chevron osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:158-165.
25. Trnka HJ, Muhlbauer M, Zettl R, et al. Comparison of the results of the Weil and Helal osteotomies for the treatment of metatarsalgia secondary to dislocation of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20:72-79.
26. Kernozek T, Roehrs T, McGarvey S. Analysis of plantar loading parameters pre and post surgical intervention for hallux vargus. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12:S18-S19.
27. Bryant AR, Tinley P, Cole JH. Plantar pressure and radiographic changes to the forefoot after the Austin bunionectomy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2005;95:357-365.
28. Waldecker U. Metatarsalgia in hallux valgus deformity: a pedographic analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2002;41:300-308.
29. Richter M, Thermann H, Hufner T, et al. Aetiology, treatment and outcome in Lisfranc joint dislocations and fracture dislocations. Foot Ankle Surg. 2002;8:21-32.
30. Richter M, Wippermann B, Krettek C, et al. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot - occurrence, causes and long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:392-398.
31. Mittlmeier T, Morlock MM, Hertlein H, et al. Analysis of morphology and gait function after intraarticular calcaneal fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7:303-310.
32. Sangeorzan BJ, Ananthakrishnan D, Tencer AF. Contact characteristics of the subtalar joint after a simulated calcaneus fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9:251-258.
33. Rosenbaum D, Bauer G, Augat P, et al. Calcaneal fractures cause a lateral load shift in Chopart joint contact stress and plantar pressure pattern in vitro. J Biomech. 1996;29:1435-1443.
34. Liu XC, Thometz JG, Tassone C, et al. Dynamic plantar pressure measurement for the normal subject: free-mapping model for the analysis of pediatric foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25:103-106.
35. Grieve DW, Rashdi T. Pressures under normal feet in standing and walking as measured by foil pedobarography. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;43:816-818.
36. Hughes J. The clinical use of pedobarography. Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59:10-16.
37. Hutchinson RJ, Betts RP, Donnan LT, et al. Assessment of Ilizarov correction of club-foot deformity using pedobarography. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1041-1045.
38. Metaxiotis D, Accles W, Pappas A, et al. Dynamic pedobarography (DPB) in operative management of cavovarus foot deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21:935-947.
39. Richter M. Kinesiologische Studien zur Ganganalyse mit Leuchtspuren. [thesis/dissertation]. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau; 1996.
40. Richter M, Wippermann B, Thermann H, et al. Plantar impact causing midfoot fractures result in higher forces in Chopart's joint than in the ankle joint. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:222-232.
41. Inman VT, Ralston HJ, Todd F. Human walking. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1981.
42. Kawakami O, Sudoh H, Watanabe S. Effects of linear movements on upright standing position. Environ Med. 1996;40:193-196.
43. Trepman E, Gellman RE, Solomon R, et al. Electromyographic analysis of standing posture and demi-plie in ballet and modern dancers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994;26:771-782.
44. Duranti R, Galletti R, Pantaleo T. Electromyographic observations in patients with foot pain syndromes. Am J Phys Med. 1985;64:295-304.
45. Richter M, Geerling J, Zech S, et al. Three-dimensional imaging (ISO-C 3D) based computer assisted surgery (CAS) guided retrograde drilling in osteochondral defects of the talus. In: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, 20th Annual Summer Meeting, Final Program 20;2004.
46. Richter M, Geerling J, Frink M, et al. Computer assisted surgery (CAS) based correction of posttraumatic ankle and hindfoot deformities. In: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), 21st Annual Summer Meeting; July 15-17, 2005; Boston, MA, USA, Final Program 33-34; 2005.