Dynamic plantar pressure measurement for the normal subject: Free-mapping model for the analysis of pediatric foot deformities

Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 103-106

  Liu, Xue C ^a,b   Thometz, John G ^a   Tassone, Channing ^a   Barker, Brady ^a   Lyon, Roger ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b Midwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic pressure; Foot deformity; Foot mapping

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOT; FOOT MALFORMATION; FORCE; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRESSURE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME;

FOOT; FOOT DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; HUMANS; PRESSURE;

EID: 11844257637     PISSN: 02716798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200501000-00023     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alexander IJ, Chao EYS, Johnson KA. The assessment of dynamic foot-to-ground contact forces and plantar pressure distribution: a review of the evolution of current techniques and clinical applications. Foot Ankle. 1990;11:152-167.
2. Becker HP, Rosenbaum D, Zeithammel G, et al. Gait pattern analysis after ankle ligament reconstruction(modified Evans procedure). Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:477-482.
3. Bowen TR, Miller F, Castagno P, et al. A method of dynamic foot-pressure measurement for the evaluation of pediatric orthopaedic foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:789-793.
4. Cavanagh PR, Morag E, Boulton AJ, et al. The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. J Biomech. 1997;30:243-250.
5. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM, Iiboshi A. Pressure distribution under symptom-free feet during barefoot standing. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:262-275.
6. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1995;77:1477-1489.
7. Hennig EM, Staats A, Rosenbaum D. Plantar pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison to adults. Foot Ankle. 1994;15:35-40.
8. Hughes J, Clark P, Klenerman L. The importance of the toes in walking. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1990;72:245-251.
9. Hughes BA, Clark P, Linge K, et al. A comparison of two studies of the pressure distribution under the feet of normal subjects using different equipment. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:514-519.
10. Hughes J, Pratt L, Linge K, et al. Reliability of pressure measurements: the EMED F system. Clin Biomech. 1991;6:14-18.
11. Holmes GB, Timmerman L, Willits NH. Practical considerations for the use of the pedobarograph. Foot Ankle. 1991;12:105-108.
12. Morag E, Cavanagh PR. Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking. J Biomech. 1999;32:359-370.
13. Rosenbaum D, Becker HP. Plantar pressure distribution: technical background and clinical applications. Foot Ankle Surg. 1997;3:1-14.
14. Wanivenhaus A, Brettschneider W. Influence of metatarsal head displacement on metatarsal pressure distribution after hallux valgus surgery. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:85-89.
15. Widhe T. Foot deformities at birth: a longitudinal prospective study over a 16-year period. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:20-24.