The neural mechanisms of long distance animal navigation

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 481-488

  Frost, Barrie J ^a   Mouritsen, Henrik ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ASTRONOMY; BIRD; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; FISH; INSECT; INVERTEBRATE; MAGNETIC FIELD; NEUROBIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SUN; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

AFFERENT PATHWAYS; ANIMALS; BRAIN; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HOMING BEHAVIOR; INVERTEBRATES; NEURONS, AFFERENT; ORIENTATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VERTEBRATES; VISION;

EID: 33746589505     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.005     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Gill R.E., Piersma T., Hufford G., Servranckx R., and Riegen A. Crossing the ultimate ecological barrier: Evidence for an 11000-km-long nonstop flight from Alaska to New Zealand and eastern Australia by Bar-tailed Godwits. Condor 107 (2005) 1-20
2. Mouritsen H. Spatiotemporal orientation strategies of long-distance migrants. In: Berthold P., Gwinner E., and Sonnenschein E. (Eds). Avian Migration (2003), Springer-Verlag 493-513
3. Cantos F.J., and Telleria J.L. Stopover site fidelity of 4 migrant warblers in the Iberian peninsula. J Avian Biol 25 (1994) 131-134
4. Uruquhart F.A. The Monarch Butterfly: International Traveller. edn 2 (1998), Wm Caxton Ltd
5. Mouritsen H., and Frost B.J. Virtual migration in tethered flying monarch butterflies reveals their orientation mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 (2002) 10162-10166
6. Wiltschko R., and Wiltschko W. Avian navigation: from historical to modern concepts. Anim Behav 65 (2003) 257-272
7. Mouritsen H. Navigation in birds and other animals. Image Vis Comput 19 (2001) 713-731
8. Wehner R. Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189 (2003) 579-588
9. Etienne A.S., and Jeffery K.J. Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus 14 (2004) 180-192. In this review, the authors examine how path integration information interacts with external landmark based cues. In particular, they discuss the relationship between activity in place and activity in head direction cells that mediates the internal representation of space, and observable orientation and search behavior.
10. Biegler R. Possible uses of path integration in animal navigation. Anim Learn Behav 28 (2000) 257-277
11. Jacobs L.F. The evolution of the cognitive map. Brain Behav Evol 62 (2003) 128-139
12. Collett T.S., and Graham P. Animal navigation: path integration, visual landmarks and cognitive maps. Curr Biol 14 (2004) R475-R477
13. Jacobs L.F., and Schenk F. Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 110 (2003) 285-315
14. Leutgeb S., Leutgeb J.K., Moser M.B., and Moser E.I. Place cells, spatial maps and the population code for memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15 (2005) 738-746
15. Wallraff H.G. Avian olfactory navigation: its empirical foundation and conceptual state. Anim Behav 67 (2004) 189-204. The utility of olfactory information for pigeon and other bird homing was at one time controversial, but Wallraff reviews the mounting evidence that this sensory modality can play an important role in this behavior. Moreover, Wallraff shows how gradients and proportional relationships of a number of atmospheric trace compounds can provide map information to these species that is fairly resistant to wind direction. Detailed gas chromatographic analyses data reveal that differentially oriented gradients of volatile hydrocarbons exist, which, when modeled, simulate homing performance similar to that observed in pigeons.
16. Nevitt G., Reid K., and Trathan P. Testing olfactory foraging strategies in an antarctic seabird assemblage. J Exp Biol 207 (2004) 3537-3544
17. Nevitt G.A., and Bonadonna F. Sensitivity to dimethyl sulphide suggests a mechanism for olfactory navigation by seabirds. Biology Letters 1 (2005) 303-305
18. Johnsen S., and Lohmann K.J. The physics and neurobiology of magnetoreception. Nat Rev Neurosci 6 (2005) 703-712. An excellent review of the theoretical and physical background and key behavioral and neurobiological evidence for magnetoreception, co-authored by one of the main contributors to the field of magnetic navigation and magnetoreception.
19. Cain S.D., Boles L.C., Wang J.H., and Lohmann K.J. Magnetic orientation and navigation in marine turtles, lobsters, and molluscs: concepts and conundrums. Integr Comp Biol 45 (2005) 539-546
20. Lohmann K.J., Lohmann C.M.F., Ehrhart L.M., Bagley D.A., and Swing T. Animal behaviour - geomagnetic map used in sea-turtle navigation. Nature 428 (2004) 909-910
21. Walker M.M., Dennis T.E., and Kirschvink J.L. The magnetic sense and its use in long-distance navigation by animals. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12 (2002) 735-744
22. Boles L.C., and Lohmann K.J. True navigation and magnetic maps in spiny lobsters. Nature 421 (2003) 60-63
23. Mittelstaedt H. Triple-loop model of path control by head direction and place cells. Biol Cybern 83 (2000) 261-270
24. Frost B.J., and Wylie D.R.W. A common frame of reference for the analysis of optic flow and vestibular information. Int Rev Neurobiol 44 (2000) 121-140
25. Wylie D.R.W., Brown M.R., Winship I.R., Crowder N.A., and Todd K.G. Zonal organization of the vestibulocerebellum in pigeons (columba livia): III. projections of the translation zones of the ventral uvula and nodulus. J Comp Neurol 465 (2003) 179-194
26. Wohlgemuth S., Ronacher B., and Wehner R. Distance estimation in the third dimension in desert ants. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 188 (2002) 273-281
27. Labhart T., and Meyer E.P. Neural mechanisms in insect navigation: polarization compass and odometer. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12 (2002) 707-714
28. Esch H.E., Zhang S., Srinivasan M.V., and Tautz J. Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow. Nature 411 (2001) 581-583
29. Etienne A.S., Maurer R., Boulens V., Levy A., and Rowe T. Resetting the path integrator: a basic condition for route-based navigation. J Exp Biol 207 (2004) 1491-1508
30. Collett T.S., and Waxman D. Ant navigation: Reading geometrical signposts. Curr Biol 15 (2005) R171-R173
31. Emlen S.T. The stellar-orientation system of a migratory bird. Sci Am 233 (1975) 102-111
32. Wiltschko R., and Wiltschko W. Magnetic Orientation in Animals (1995), Springer-Verlag
33. Mouritsen H., and Mouritsen O. A mathematical expectation model for bird navigation based on the clock-and-compass strategy. J Theor Biol 207 (2000) 283-291
34. Lipp H.P., Vyssotski A.L., Wolfer D.P., Renaudineau S., Savini M., Tröster G., and Dell'Omo G. Pigeon homing along highways and exits. Curr Biol 14 (2004) 1239-1249
35. Meade J., Biro D., and Guilford T. Homing pigeons develop local route stereotypy. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272 (2005) 17-23
36. O'Keefe J. Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat. Exp Neurol 51 (1976) 78-109
37. Taube J.S., Muller R.U., and Ranck J.B. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. 1. description and quantitative-analysis. J Neurosci 10 (1990) 420-435
38. Taube J.S., Muller R.U., and Ranck J.B. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. 2. effects of environmental manipulations. J Neurosci 10 (1990) 436-447
39. Hafting T., Fyhn M., Molden S., Moser M.B., and Moser E.I. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 436 (2005) 801-806. This study shows that the dorsocaudal medial entorhinal (dMEC) cortex of rats contains neural maps of the near spatial environment, which are directionally and topographically oriented. This region has grid or tile cells that are active whenever the rat crosses any apex of a grid of equilateral triangles that completely tile the whole surface of the near space the animal is exploring. Neighboring cells have similar spacing and the same orientation, reminiscent of orientation columns in the visual cortex of mammals, but might be offset in phase so that they can, therefore, more completely cover the total space of the near environment. These maps are anchored to conspicuous nearby landmarks. Most intriguingly, there appears to be a systematic representation of scale from more dorsal towards more ventral loci in the dMEC. This might enable animals to move from one part of their larger environment to another and then retrieve the local sketch maps relative to their current location (Figure 1d).
40. Fuhs M.C., and Touretzky D.S. A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex. J Neurosci 26 (2006) 4266-4276
41. Hough G.E., and Bingman V.P. Spatial response properties of homing pigeon hippocampal neurons: correlations with goal locations, movement between goals, and environmental context in a radial-arm arena. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 190 (2004) 1047-1062
42. Siegel J.J., Nitz D., and Bingman V.P. Spatial-specificity of single-units in the hippocampal formation of freely moving homing pigeons. Hippocampus 15 (2005) 26-40
43. Stalleicken J., Mukhida M., Labhart T., Wehner R., Frost B., and Mouritsen H. Do monarch butterflies use polarized skylight for migratory orientation?. J Exp Biol 208 (2005) 2399-2408
44. Sommer S., and Wehner R. Vector navigation in desert ants. Cataglyphis fortis: celestial compass cues are essential for the proper use of distance information. Naturwissenschaften 92 (2005) 468-471
45. Cochran W.W., Mouritsen H., and Wikelski M. Migrating songbirds recalibrate their magnetic compass daily from twilight cues. Science 304 (2004) 405-408
46. Pettigrew J.D. A role for the avian pecten oculi in orientation to the sun. In: Schmidt-Koenig K. (Ed). Animal Migration, Navigation and Homing (1978), Springer-Verlag 42-54
47. Homberg U. In search of the sky compass in the insect brain. Naturwissenschaften 91 (2004) 199-208. The author reviews the extensive evidence for the peripheral and central processing mechanisms of polarization vision in insects with a special emphasis on the locust, Schistocerca gergaria. The author traces polarized vision from specialized photoreceptor cells in the dorsal rim area (DRA) through specific areas in the lamina to the medulla of the optic lobe, then through to the anterior optic tubercle, the lateral accessory lobe and the central complex of the midbrain. Moreover, the author suggests that polarized light information might be integrated with information on solar position by work that will appear in publication very soon. This latest work, described in the abstract below [53], will demonstrate that sun azimuthal position, polarization patterns and perhaps even gradients of spectral distribution in the sky are all integrated together in the central complex, which then controls motor activity.
48. Dacke M., Nordström P., Scholtz C.H., and Warrant E.J. A specialized dorsal rim area for polarized light detection in the compound eye of the scarab beetle pachysoma striatum. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 188 (2002) 211-216
49. Dacke M., Doan T.A., and O'Carroll D.C. Polarized light detection in spiders. J Exp Biol 204 (2001) 2481-2490
50. Sauman I., Briscoe A.D., Zhu H.S., Shi D.D., Froy O., Stallelcken J., Yuan Q., Casselman A., and Reppert S.M. Connecting the navigational clock to sun compass input in monarch butterfly brain. Neuron 46 (2005) 457-467
51. Stalleicken J., Labhart T., and Mouritsen H. Physiological characterization of the compound eye in monarch butterflies with focus on the dorsal rim area. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192 (2006) 321-331
52. Labhart T., and Meyer E.P. Detectors for polarized skylight in insects: a survey of ommatidial specializations in the dorsal rim area of the compound eye. Microsc Res Tech 47 (1999) 368-379
53. th Meeting of the German Neuroscience Society. 218. 2005. Available online: www.neuro.uni-goettingen.de/archiv/2005/pdf/Proceedings-Goettingen2005.p df.
54. Hawryshyn C.W., Moyer H.D., Allison W.T., Haimberger T.J., and McFarland W.N. Multidimensional polarization sensitivity in damselfishes. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 189 (2003) 213-220
55. Hawryshyn C.W. Ultraviolet polarization vision in fishes: possible mechanisms for coding e-vector. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355 (2000) 1187-1190
56. Morris V.B. Symmetry in a receptor mosaic demonstrated in the chick from the frequencies, spacing and arrangement of the types of retinal receptor. J Comp Neurol 140 (1970) 359-398
57. Wiltschko W., Daum P., Fergenbauer-Kimmel A., and Wiltschko R. The development of the star compass in garden warblers, sylvia borin. Ethology 74 (1987) 285-292
58. Morgan B., and Frost B.J. Visual response characteristics of neurons in nucleus of basal optic root of pigeons. Exp Brain Res 42 (1981) 181-188
59. Crowder N.A., Dawson M.R.W., and Wylie D.R.W. Temporal frequency and velocity-like tuning in the pigeon accessory optic system. J Neurophysiol 90 (2003) 1829-1841
60. Phillips J.B., and Borland S.C. Behavioral evidence for use of a light-dependent magnetoreception mechanism by a vertebrate. Nature 359 (1992) 142-144
61. Ritz T., Thalau P., Phillips J.B., Wiltschko R., and Wiltschko W. Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass. Nature 429 (2004) 177-180. The authors show that 470 nT oscillating magnetic fields in the low radio-frequency range disrupt the magnetic compass responses of migratory birds. The pattern of effects of the oscillating fields is consistent with the expectations from a radical-pair mechanism, but cannot easily be reconciled with other mechanisms. These results represent the strongest currently available, albeit indirect, evidence for a chemical magnetodetection mechanism in birds.
62. Ugolini A. Equatorial sandhoppers use body scans to detect the earth's magnetic field. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 192 (2006) 45-49
63. Wiltschko W., and Wiltschko R. Magnetic compass orientation in birds and its physiological basis. Naturwissenschaften 89 (2002) 445-452
64. Wang J.H., Cain S.D., and Lohmann K.J. Identification of magnetically responsive neurons in the marine mollusc Tritonia diomedea. J Exp Biol 206 (2003) 381-388
65. Mouritsen H., Feenders G., Liedvogel M., and Kropp W. Migratory birds use head scans to detect the direction of the earth's magnetic field. Curr Biol 14 (2004) 1946-1949
66. Mouritsen H., and Ritz T. Magnetoreception and its use in bird navigation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15 (2005) 406-414. The authors review the evidence for magnetoreception in birds. They conclude that birds probably possess two different magnetoreception mechanisms, a light-mediated mechanism in the eye(s) of the birds and a magnetite-mediated mechanism in the beak region. They summarize the review by listing 10 of the most crucial open questions currently facing researchers studying magnetoreception in birds and other animals.
67. Walker M.M., Diebel C.E., Haugh C.V., Pankhurst P.M., and Montgomery J.C. Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense. Nature 390 (1997) 371-373
68. Fleissner G., Holtkamp-Rötzler E., Hanzlik M., Winklhofer M., Fleissner G., Petersen N., and Wiltschko W. Ultrastructural analysis of a putative magnetoreceptor in the beak of homing pigeons. J Comp Neurol 458 (2003) 350-360
69. Mora C.V., Davison M., Wild J.M., and Walker M.M. Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon. Nature 432 (2004) 508-511. The authors use operant conditioning to show that pigeons can detect a strong (∼100,000 nanoTesla) magnetic anomaly and that the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve carries this magnetic information to the brain. It remains to be shown that this mechanism can detect biologically relevant magnetic anomalies. Older results of Beason and Semm [78] suggest that magnetic information transmitted through the trigeminal nerve is not needed for magnetic compass orientation.
70. Ritz T., Adem S., and Schulten K. A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds. Biophys J 78 (2000) 707-718
71. Wiltschko W., Gesson M., Stapput K., and Wiltschko R. Light-dependent magnetoreception in birds: interaction of at least two different receptors. Naturwissenschaften 91 (2004) 130-134
72. Wiltschko W., Traudt J., Gunturkun O., Prior H., and Wiltschko R. Lateralization of magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird. Nature 419 (2002) 467-470
73. Mouritsen H., Janssen-Bienhold U., Liedvogel M., Feenders G., Stalleicken J., Dirks P., and Weiler R. Cryptochromes and neuronal-activity markers colocalize in the retina of migratory birds during magnetic orientation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 (2004) 14294-14299. The authors show that cryptochromes, a putative magnetoreceptive molecule, are found in the retinae of night-migratory garden warblers, and they map the cellular location of cryptochromes within the retina. The authors also show that the retinal ganglion cells and displaced ganglion cells, which also contain lots of cryptochrome, show high levels of neuronal activity during magnetic orientation in migratory birds. Furthermore, the authors found clear differences in cryptochrome expression and neuronal activity between migratory garden warblers and non-migratory zebra finches, which support the suggestion that cryptochromes could be the primary sensor for the magnetic compass in migratory birds.
74. Möller A., Sagasser S., Wiltschko W., and Schierwater B. Retinal cryptochrome in a migratory passerine bird: a possible transducer for the avian magnetic compass. Naturwissenschaften 91 (2004) 585-588. The authors demonstrate that cryptochromes, a putative magnetoreceptive molecule, are found in the retina of a night-migratory bird, the European Robin.
75. Mouritsen H., Feenders G., Liedvogel M., Wada K., and Jarvis E.D. Night-vision brain area in migratory songbirds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 8339-8344. The authors use sensory-driven gene expression to show that night migratory songbirds possess a tight cluster of brain regions, 'Cluster N', that are highly active only during night-vision. No increase in activity in Cluster N was observed during the day in any birds and the activity in Cluster N disappeared in migrants when both eyes were covered. By contrast, neuronal activation of Cluster N was not increased in non-migratory birds, during either the day or the night. The discovery of a seemingly specialized distinct night-vision brain area in night-migratory songbirds supports the idea that they process magnetically modulated visual signals at night.
76. Wood C.A. The Fundus Oculi of Birds (1917), The Lakeside Press
77. Walls G.L. The Vertebrate Eye and its Adaptive Radiation (1942), Hafner
78. Beason R.C., and Semm P. Does the avian ophthalmic nerve carry magnetic navigational information?. J Exp Biol 199 (1996) 1241-1244