A common frame of reference for the analysis of optic flow and vestibular information

International Review of Neurobiology

Volumn 44, Issue , 2000, Pages 121-140

  Frost, B J ^a   Wylie, D R W ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FLYING; HEAD MOVEMENT; HISTOLOGY; LOCOMOTION; MAMMAL; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; RETINA; REVIEW; ROTATION; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; EYE MOVEMENTS; FLIGHT, ANIMAL; HEAD MOVEMENTS; LOCOMOTION; MAMMALS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; RABBITS; RETINA; ROTATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033628355     PISSN: 00747742     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60740-0     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Allnian, J., Miezin, F., and MacGinnes, E. (1985). Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 407-430.
2. Arends, j. J. A., and Voogd, J. (1989). Topographic aspects of the olivocerebellar system in the pigeon. Exp. Brain Res. Snppl. 17, 52-57.
3. Barlow, H. B., Blakemore, C., and Pettigreu, J. D. (1967). The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J. Plwsiol. 193, 327-342.
4. Brecha, N1., Karten, H. [., and Hunt, S. P. (1980). Projections of the nucleus of basal optic root in the pigeon: An autoradiographic and horseradish peroxidase study. J. C.omp. Peurol. 189, 615-670.
5. Burns, S., and Wallman, J. (1981). Relation of single unit properties to the oculomotor function of the nucleus of the basal optic root (AOS) in chickens. fix/), limhi Res. 42, 171-180.
6. Clarke, P. G. H. (1977). Some visual and other connections to the cerebellum of the pigeon. J. Com]}. Xeni'ol. 174, 535-552.
7. Colleuijn, H. (1975). Direction-selective units in the rabbit's nucleus of the optic tract. Hrnhi Res. 100, 489-508.
8. De /eeuu, C. I., Wylie, D. R., Stahl, J. S., and Simpson. J. I. (1995). Phase relations of Purkinje cells in the rabbit flocculus during compensatory eye movements. J. . 74, 2051-2064.
9. Fgelhaaf, M., and Borst, A. (1993). A look into the cockpit of the fly: Visual orientation, algorithms, and identified neurons. J. .cnn>sci. 13, 4563-f574.
10. Erich.sen, J. T., Hoclos, W., Evinger, C., Bessette, B. B., and Phillips, S. J. (1989). Head orientation in pigeons: Postural, locomotor and visual determinants. Bra in Behav. Evol. 33, 268-278.
11. Esch, H. F., and Burns, J. F. (1996). Distance estimation by foraging honeybees. J. tiiol. 199, 155-162.
12. Fite, K. V. (1985). Pretectal and accessory-optic visual nuclei offish, amphibia and reptiles: Theme and variations. Krahi Be/iai'. Evol. 26, 192-202.
13. File, K. W., Brecha, N., Karten. H. J., and Hunt, S. P. (1981). Displaced ganglion cells and the accessory optic svstem of the pigeon. J. C.omp. Xi'iiml. 195, 279-288.
14. Freeman, R. I., and Ohzawa, I. (1988). Monocularly deprived cats: Binocular tests of cortical cells reveal functional connections from the deprived eye.J. Neurosci. 8, 2491-2506.
15. Frost, B. J. (1978). Moving background patterns alter directionally specific responses of pigeon tectal neurons. Brain Res. 151, 359-365.
16. Frost, B. J. (1982). Mechanisms for discriminating object motion from self-induced motion in the pigeon. In: "Analysis of Visual Behavior" (D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, and J. W. Mansfield, Eds.), pp. 177-196. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Frost, B. J. (1985). Neural mechanisms for detecting object motion and figure-ground boundaries contrasted with self-motion detecting systems. In: "Brain Mechanisms of Spatial Vision" (D. Ingle, M. Jeannerod, and D. Lee, Eds.), pp. 415-449. Matrinus Nijhoft, Dordrecht.
18. Frost, B. J., and Nakayama, K. (1983). Single visual neurons code opposing motion independent of direction. Science 220, 744-745.
19. Frost, B. J., Scilley, P. L., and Wong, S. C. (1981). Moving background patterns reveal double-opponency of directionally specific pigeon tectal neurons. Exp. Brain Res. 43, 173-185.
20. Frost, B. J., Cavanaugh, P., and Morgan, B. J. (1988). Deep tectal cells in pigeons respond to kinematograms. J. Comp. Physiol. A 162, 639-647.
21. Frost, B. J., D. R. Wylie, and Y-C. Wang (1994). The analysis of motion in the visual systems of birds. In: "Perception and Motor Control in Birds" (P. Green and M. Davies, Eds.), pp. 249-266. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
22. Gamlin, P. D. R ., and Cohen, D. H. (1988a). The retinal projections to the pretectum in the pigeon (Colnmba Iivia). J. Comp. Neural. 269, 1-17.
23. Gamlin, P. D. R., and Cohen, D. H. (1988b). Projections of the retinorecipient pretectal nuclei in the pigeon (Colnmba Iivia). J. Comp. Neural. 269, 18-46.
24. Gibson, J. J. (1979). "The ecological approach to visual perception." Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
25. Gioanni, H., Rey, J., Villalobos, J., and Dalbera, A. (1984). Single unit activity in the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) during optokinetic, vestibular and visuovestibular stimulations in the alert pigeon (Columba Iivia). Exp. Brain Res. 57, 49-60.
26. Graf, W., Simpson, J. I., and Leonard, C. S. (1988). Spatial organization of visual messages of the rabbit's cerebellar flocculus. II. Complex and simple spike responses of Purkinje cells.J. Neurophysiol. 60, 2091-2121.
27. Grasse, K. L., and Cynader, M. S. (1982). Electrophysiology of the medial terminal nucleus of the cat accessory optic system. J. Neurophysiol. 48, 490-504.
28. Cirasse, K. L., and Cynader, M. S. (1984). Electrophysiology of the lateral and dorsal terminal nuclei of the cat accessory optic system.J. Neurophysiol. 51, 276-293.
29. Grasse, K. L., and Cynader, M. S. (1990). The accessory optic system in frontal-eyed animals. In: "Vision and Visual Dysfunction: "The Neuronal Basis of Visual Function," (A. Leventhal, Ed.), vol. IV, pp. 111-139. MacMillan, New York.
30. Hoffmann, K. P., and Schoppmann, A. (1975). Retinal input to direction selective cells in the nucleus tractus opticus of the cat. Brain Res. 99, 359-366.
31. Hoffmann, K-P., and Schoppmann, A. (1981). A quantitative analysis of direction-specific response of neurons in the cat's nucleus of the optic tract. Exp. Brain Res. 42, 146-157.
32. I to, M. (1984). "The Cerebellum and Motor Control." Raven Press, New York.
33. Karten, H. J., Fite, K. V., and Brecha, N. (1977). Specific projection of displaced retinal ganglion cells upon the accessory optic system in the pigeon (Columba Iivia). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sa. USA 74, 1752-1756.
34. Koenderink, J. J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Res. 26, 161-180.
35. Krapp, H. G., and Hengstenberg, R. (1996). Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual intenieurons. Xatitre 384, 463-166.
36. Lau, K. L., Glover, R. G., Linkenhoker, B., and Wylie, D. R. W. (1998). Topographical organization of inferior olive cells projecting to translation and rotation /ones in the vestibulocerebellum of pigeons. Xeurosci. 85, 605-614.
37. Lee, D. N., and Aronson, E. (1974). Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants. Perce])J. Psychophys. 15, 529-532.
38. Leonard, C. S.. Simpson, J. I., an Graf, W. (1988). Spatial organization of visual messages of the rabbit's cerebellar flocculus. I. Typology of inferior olive neurons of the dorsal cap of Koov.J. Xeurosci. 60, 2073-2090.
39. Manteuffel, G. (1987). Binocular afférents to the salamander pretectum mediate sensitivity of cells selective for visual background motions. Brain Res. 422, 381-383.
40. McKenna. C., and Wallman, J. (1985). Accessory optic system and pretectum of birds: Comparisons with those of other vertebrates. Brain Bella:1. Ei'ol. 26, 91-1 16.
41. Morgan, B., and Frost, B. j. (1981). Visual response properties of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root of pigeons. Ex/). Brain Res. 42, 184-188.
42. Owen, D. H. (1990). Perception & control of changes in self-motion: A functional approach to the study of information and skill. In: "Perception &: Control of Self-Motion" (R. Warren and A. F. Fuchs, Kds.), pp. 289-322. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N'J.
43. Pettigrew, j. D., Nikara, T., and Bishop, P. O. (1968). Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: Simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exj>. Brain Res. 6, 391-410.
44. Poggio, G. F., and Fischer, B. (1977). Binocular interaction! and depth sensitivitv in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. J. Xeurosci 40, 1392-1405.
45. Reiner, A., Brecha, W., and Karten, H. J. (1979). A specific projection of retinal displaced ganglion cells to the nucleus of the basal optic root in the chicken. Xeurosci. 4, 1079-1088.
46. Rosenberg. A. F., and Ariel, M. (1990). Visual-réponse properties of neurons in the turtle basal optic' nucleus in vitro. J. Xeurop/issioJ. 63, 1033-1045.
47. SchwarJ., I. E., and Schwarz, D. W. F. (1983). The primary vestibular projection to the cerebellar cortx in the pigeon (Columba livid). J. C.oiiij). XeitwI. 216, 438-444.
48. Simpson. J. I. (1984). The accessory optic system. Ann. RCT.<. Xeurosci. 7, 13-11.
49. Simpson, J. I., and Alley, K. E. (1974). Visual climbing fibre input to rabbit vestibulocerebellum: a source of direction-specific information. Brain Res. 82, 302-308.
50. Simpson, J. 1., and Graf, W. (1985). The selection of reference frames by nature and its investigators. In: "Adaptive Mechanisms in Gaze Control: Facts and Theories" (A. Berthoz and G. Melvill-Jones, Eds.), pp. 3-16. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
51. Simpson, J. L, Graf, W., and Leonard, C. (1981). The coordinate system of visual climbing fibres to the flocculus. In: "Progress in Oculomotor Research" (A. F. Fuchs and W. Becker, Eds.), pp.475-484. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
52. Simpson. J. L, Giolli, R. A., and Blanks, R. H. 1. (1988a). The pretectal nuclear complex and the accessory optic system. In: "Neuroanatomy of the Oculomotor System" (J. A. Buttner-Ennerver, Ed.). pp. 335-364. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
53. Simpson, J. L, Leonard, C. S., and Soodak, R. E. (1988b). Ehe accessor) optic system of rabbit. II. Spatial organization of direction selectivity. J. Xe//roj)/n'sinl. 60, 2055-2072.
54. Soodak, R. E., and Simpson, J. I. (1988). The accessor}- optic system of rabbit. L Basic visual response properties. J. Xeiirophssioi. 60, 2037-2054.
55. Srinivasan, M. V., Lehrer, M., Zhaiig, S. W., and Horridge, G. A. (1989). How honeybees measure their distance from objects of unknown size. J. ('.(imp. Plnsiol. A 165, 605-613.
56. Sun, H-J., and Frost, B. J. (1997). Motion processing in pigeon tectum: equiluminant chromatic mechanisms. Exp. Brain Res. 116, 434-444.
57. Waespe, W., and Henn, V. (1981). Visual-vestibular interaction in the flocculus of the alert monkey. II. Purkinje cell activity. Exp. Brain Res. 43, 349-360.
58. Waespe, W., and Henn, V. (1987). Gaze stabilization in the primate: The interaction of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, optokinetic nystagmus, and smooth pursuit. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 106, 37-125.
59. Wagner, H., and Frost, B. (1994). Disparity-sensitive cells in the owl have a characteristic disparity. Nature 364, 796-798.
60. Weber, J. T. (1985). Pretectal complex and accessory optic system in alert monkeys. Brain Behav. Evol. 26, 117-140.
61. Whishaw, I. Q., and Maaswinkel, H. (1998). Rats with fimbria-fornix lesions are impaired in path integration: A role for the hippocampus in "sense of direction." J. Neurosci. 18, 3050-3058.
62. Winterson, B. J., and Brauth, S. E. (1985). Direction-selective single units in the nucleus lentiformis mesencephali of the pigeon (Columba livia). Exp. Brain Res. 60, 215-226.
63. Wong, S. C. P., and Frost, B. J. (1981). The effect of visual-vestibular conflict on the latency of steady-state visually induced subjective rotation. Percept. Psychophy.s. 30, 228-236.
64. Wylie, D. R., and Frost, B. J. (1990a). Visual response properties of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root of the pigeon: A quantitative analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 82, 327-336.
65. Wylie, D. R., and Frost, B. J. (1990b). Binocular neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR) of the pigeon are selective for either translational or rotational visual flow. Vision Neurosci. 5, 489-495.
66. Wylie, D. R., and Frost, B. J. (1993). Responses of pigeon vestibulocerebellar neurons to optokinetic stimulation: II. The 3-dimensional reference frame of rotation neurons in the flocculus. J. Neurophysiol. 70, 2647-2659.
67. Wylie, D. R. W., and Frost, B. J. (1996). The pigeon optokinetic system: Visual input in extraocular muscle coordinates. Vision Neurosci. 13, 945-953.
68. Wylie, D. W. and Frost, B. J. (1999a). Complex spike activity of purkinje cells in the ventral uvula and nodulus of pigeons in response to translational optic flowfields. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 256-266.
69. Wylie, D. W. and Frost, B. J. (1999b). Responses of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root to translational and rotational flowfields. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 267-276.
70. Wylie, D. R. W., and Linkenhoker, B. (1996). Mossy fibres from the nucleus of the basal optic root project to the vestibular and cerebellar nuclei in pigeons. Neurosci. Lett. 219, 83-86.
71. Wylie, D. R., Kripalani, T-K., and Frost, B. J. (1993). Responses of pigeon vestibulocerebellar neurons to optokinetic stimulation: I. Functional organization of neurons discriminating between translational and rotational visual flow. J. Neurophysiol. 70, 2632-2646.
72. Wylie, D. R. W., Linkenhoker, B., and Lau, K. L. (1997). Projections of the nucleus of the basal optic root in pigeons (Columba livia) revealed with biotinylated dextran amine. J. Comp. Neurol. 384, 517-536.
73. Wylie, D. R. W., Glover, R. G., and Lau, K. L. (1998a). Projections from the accessory optic system and pretectum to the dorsolateral thalamus in the pigeon (Columba livia): A study using both anterograde and retrograde tracers. J. Comp. Neurol. 391, 456-469.
74. Wylie, D. R. W., Bischof, W. F., and Frost, B. J. (1998b). Gommon reference frame for coding translational and rotational optic flow. Nature 392, 278-282.