The visual perception of plane tilt from motion in small field and large field: Psychophysics and theory

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 3494-3513

  Zhong, H ^a   Cornilleau Peres V ^b   Cheong, L F ^c   Yeow, G M ^c   Droulez, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

3D space; Depth; Motion parallax; Optic flow; Orientation; Plane; Structure from motion; Tilt Direction; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MODEL; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; THEORY; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 33746572627     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beck J., and Gibson J.J. The relation of apparent shape to apparent slant in the perception of objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (1955) 125-133
2. Börjesson E., and Lind M. The effect of polar projection on the perception of euclidean structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 58 (1996) 871-882
3. Braunstein M.L. Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1968) 247-253
4. Cornilleau-Pérès V., and Droulez J. Visual perception of surface curvature: psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics 46 (1989) 351-364
5. Cornilleau-Pérès V., and Gielen C.C.A.M. The interactions between self-motion and depth perception in the processing of optic flow. Trends in Neurosciences 19 (1996) 196-202
6. Cornilleau-Pérès, V., Tai, L.C., Cheong, L.F., & Droulez, J. (2005). Visual distortions of the 3D visual space induced by motion parallax. Conference of the International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulations (IMACS), Paris, T4-I-88-0309.
7. Cornilleau-Pérès V., Wexler M., Droulez J., Marin E., Miège C., and Bourdoncle B. Visual perception of planar orientation: dominance of static depth cues over motion cues. Vision Research 42 (2002) 1403-1412
8. Cornilleau-Pérès V., Wong T.K., Cheong L.F., and Droulez J. Visual perception of slant from optic flow under orthographic projection and perspective projection. Investigative Ophtalmology & Visual Sciences 41 (2000) 3820
9. Daniilidis, K., & Nagel, H.-H. (1993). The coupling of rotation and translation in motion estimation of planar surfaces. IEEE Conference On Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New York,188-193.
10. Dijkerman H.C., Milner A.D., and Carey D.P. The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane. I. Effects of visual form agnosia. Experimental Brain Research 112 (1996) 442-451
11. Dijkstra T.M.G., Cornilleau-Pérès V., Gielen C.C.A.M., and Droulez J. Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego-and object-motion: comparison between small- and large-field stimuli. Vision Research 35 4 (1995) 453-462
12. Domini F., and Braunstein M.L. Recovery of 3D structure from motion is neither euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (1998) 1273-1295
13. Domini F., and Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology 25 (1999) 426-444
14. Droulez J., and Cornilleau-Pérès V. Visual perception of surface curvature. The spin variation and its physiological implications. Biological Cybernetics 62 (1990) 211-224
15. Eagle R.A., and Blake A. Two-dimensional constraints on three-dimensional structure from motion tasks. Vision Research 35 (1995) 2927-2941
16. Freeman R.B. Absolute threshold for visual slant: the effect of stimulus size and retinal perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (1966) 170-176
17. Freeman T.C.A., Harris M.G., and Meese T.S. On the relationship between deformation and perceived surface slant. Vision Research 36 (1996) 317-322
18. Garding J., Porrill J., Mayhew J.E.W., and Frisby J.P. Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations. Vision Research 5 (1995) 703-722
19. Gibson J.J., and Carel W. Does motion perspective independently produce the impression of a receding surface?. Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (1952) 16-18
20. Hoffman D.D. Inferring local surface orientation from motion fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America A72 (1982) 888-892
21. Koenderink J.J., and van Doorn A.J. Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America 66 (1976) 717-723
22. Koenderink J.J., and van Doorn A.J. Relief: pictorial and otherwise. Image and Vision Computing 5 (1995) 321-334
23. Lappe M. Computational mechanisms for optic flow analysis in primate cortex. International Review of Neurobiology 44 (2000) 235-268
24. Longuet-Higgins H.C. The visual ambiguity of a moving plane. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 223 (1984) 165-175
25. Longuet-Higgins H.C., and Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 208 (1980) 385-397
26. Marotta J.J., Perrot T.S., Nicolle D., Servos P., and Goodale M.A. Adapting to monocular vision : grasping with one eye. Experimental Brain Research 104 (1995) 107-114
27. Nakayama K., Silverman G., MacLeod D.I.A., and Mulligan J. Sensitivity to shearing and compressive motion in random dots. Perception 14 (1985) 225-238
28. Norman J.F., and Lappin J.S. The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics 51 (1992) 386-396
29. Norman J.F., Todd J.T., and Phillips F. The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information. Perception & Psychophysics 57 (1995) 629-636
30. Stevens K.A. Surface tilt (the direction of slant): a neglected psychophysical variable. Perception & Psychophysics 33 (1983) 241-250
31. Subbarao M. Interpretation of visual motion: a computational study. Series: research notes in artificial intelligence (1988), Pitman, London
32. Todd J., and Perotti V. The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics 61 (1999) 1577-1589
33. Todd J., and Norman J.F. The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics 50 (1991) 509-523
34. Tsai R.Y., and Huang T.S. Uniqueness and estimation of three-dimensional motion parameters of rigid objects with curved surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (1984) 13-27
35. van Boxtel J.J., Wexler M., and Droulez J. Perception of plane orientation from self-generated and passively observed optic flow. Journal of Vision 3 (2003) 318-332
36. Waxman A.M., and Ullman S. Surface structure and three-dimensional motion from image flow kinematics. International Journal of Robotics Research 4 (1985) 72-94
37. Wexler M., Panerai F., Lamouret I., and Droulez J. Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects. Nature 409 (2001) 85-88
38. Zhong, H., Cornilleau-Pérès, V., Cheong, L.F., & Droulez, J. (2000). Visual encoding of tilt from optic flow : psychophysics and computational modelling. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences. Springer Verlag. p800-816.
39. Zhong H., Cornilleau-Pérès V., Cheong L.F., Yeow M.G., and Droulez J. Tilt perception from optic flow in two-view stimuli. Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting. Journal of Vision 1 3 (2001) 315 (abstract)