Amplitude modulation following responses in audiological diagnostics;Amplitude modulation following responses (AMFR) in der audiologischen diagnostik

HNO

Volumn 50, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1045-1052

  Pethe, J ^a   Muhler R ^a   Von Specht, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MAGDEBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amplitude modulation; Hearing threshold; Potential determination; Steady state response

Indexed keywords

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; AUDIOLOGY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; REVIEW;

EID: 0036934117     PISSN: 00176192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-002-0710-0     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Anft D, Bartsch E, Scholz G, Mrowinski D (1998) Untersuchungen der Frequenzspezifität akustisch evozierter Potenziale früher und mittlerer Latenz mit Hochpaßmaskierung. HNO 46: 513-518
2. Aoyagi M, Kiren T, Kim Y et al. (1993) Optimal modulation frequency for amplitude-modulation following response in young children during sleep. Hear Res 65: 253-263
3. Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Wernecke K-D (2001) Objective detection of the Amplitude Modulation-Following Response (AMFR). Audiology 40: 245-252
4. Chambers RD, Meyer TA (1993) Reliability of threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults using AMFR. J Am Acad Audiol 4: 22-32
5. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1989) Analysis of auditory evoked potentials by Magnitude-Squared Coherence. Ear Hear 10: 2-13
6. Doble RA, Wilson MJ (1995) Comparison of objective threshold estimation procedures for 40-Hz auditory evoked potentials. Ear Hear 16: 299-310
7. Dobie RA, Wilson MJ (1998) Low-level steady-state auditory evoked potentials: Effects of rate and sedation on detectability. J Acoust Soc Am 104: 3482-3488
8. Fleischer S, Hess M (2002) Besonderheiten der Hörgeräteversorgung im Säuglings-, Klein-kind- und Vorschulalter. HNO 50: 501-510
9. Griffths SK, Chambers RD (1991) The Amplitude Modulation-Following Response as an audiometric tool. Ear Hear 12: 235-241
10. Herdmann AT, Stapells DR (2001) Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 30: 41-49
11. Hoke M, Hoke E S (1997) Wandel in Diagnostik und Therapie: Auditorische reiz- und ereigniskorrelierte Potentiale und Magnetfelder in der audiologischen Diagnostik. In: Koch U, Theissing J (Hrsg) Verhandlungsbericht 1997 der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Referate: HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals- Chirurgie im Wandel. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio, S 175-217
12. Jerger J (1998) Editorial: The auditory steady-state response. J Am Acad Audiol 9: 332
13. John MS, Picton TW (2000) Human auditory steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones: phase and latency measurements. Hear Res 141: 57-79
14. John S, Dimitrijevic A, van Roon P, Picton TW (2001) Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 6:12-27
15. Kuwada S, Batra R, Maher V (1986) Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. Hear Res 21: 179-192
16. Levi EC, Folsom RC, Dobie RA (1993) Amplitude-modulation following response (AMFR): Effects of modulation rate, carrier frequency, age and state. Hear Res 68: 42-52
17. Lins OG, Picton TW, Boucher BL et al. (1996) Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 17: 81-96
18. Mühler R, Pethe J, von Specht H (2000) Abschätzung der Hörschwelle mit stationären auditorischen evozierten Potenzialen: Probleme der digitalen Signalverarbeitung. Z Med Phys 10: 139-146
19. Oates P, Stapells DR (1998) Auditory brainstem response estimates of the pure-tone audiogram: current status. Semin Hear 19: 61-85
20. Perez-Abalo MC, Savio G, Torres A et al. (2001) Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 22: 200-211
21. Pethe J, Hocke T, Mühler R, von Specht H (2000) On the frequency spectrum of Amplitude Modulation Following Responses. Scand Audiol 29: 191-195
22. Pethe J, Mühler R, von Specht H (2001) Zur Abhängigkeit der AMFR von der Vigilanz. HNO 49: 188-193
23. Picton TW, Skinner CR, Champagne SC, Kellett AJC, Maiste A (1987) Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. J Acoust Soc Am 82: 165-178
24. Picton TW, Dimitrijevic A, John MS, von Roon P (2001) The use of phase in the detection of auditory steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 1698-1711
25. Rance G, Dowell RC, Rickards FW, Beer DE, Clark GM (1998) Steady-state evoked potential and behavioural hearing threshold in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brainstem response. Ear Hear 19: 48-61
26. Valdes JL, Perez-Abalo MC, Martin V et al. (1997) Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80 Hz auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 18: 420-429
27. Welzl-Müller K (1998) Neugeborenen-Hör-screening: Siebtest nach Hörstörungen bei Neugeborenen. Bericht über die "European Consensus Development Conference on Neonatal Hearing Screening", Mailand, 15.-16. Mai 1998. HNO 46: 404-407