Detecting early functional damage in glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertensive patients with the multifocal VEP technique

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 321-327

  Thienprasiddhi, Phamornsak ^a   Greenstein, Vivienne C ^b,d   Chu, David H ^a,b   Xu, Li ^c   Liebmann, Jeffrey M ^b,e   Ritch, Robert ^a,f   Hood, Donald C ^c  

^a NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^d Manhattan Eye Ear and Throat Hospital ^*  (United States)

^e EAR AND THROAT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^f NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma suspects; Multifocal visual evoked potentials; Ocular hypertension

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR HYPERTENSION; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TECHNIQUE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

DISEASE PROGRESSION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PERIMETRY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOTOMA; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33746462675     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212237.26466.0e     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:17-21.
2. Tielsch JM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA. 1991;266:369-374.
3. Quigley HA, West SK, Rodriguez J, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1819-1826.
4. Jonas JB, Nguyen NX, Naumann GOH. Non-quantitative morphologic criteria in normal and glaucomatous optic discs. Acta Ophthalmol. 1989;67:361-366.
5. Sommer A, Pollack I, Maumenee AE. Optic disc parameters and onset of glaucomatous visual field loss, I. Methods and progressive changes in disc morphology. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1444-1448.
6. Pederson JE, Anderson DR. The mode of progressive disc cupping in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:490-495.
7. Balazsi AG, Drance SM, Schulzer M, et al. Neuroretinal rim area in suspected glaucoma and early open-angle glaucoma. Correlations with parameters of visual function. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:1011-1014.
8. Caprioli J, Miller JM, Sears M. Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in patients with unilateral visual field loss from primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:1484-1487.
9. Tuulonen A, Lehtola J, Airaksinen PJ. Nerve fiber layer defects with normal visual fields. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:587-598.
10. Jonas JB, Konigsreuther KA. Optic disk appearance in ocular hypertensive eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;117:732-740.
11. Jonas JB, Dichtl A. Optic disc morphology in myopic primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1997;235:627-633.
12. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR, et al. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma, II: the site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:635-649.
13. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:357-363.
14. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, et al. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:645-650.
15. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Frequency doubling technology perimetry abnormalities as predictors of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:863-871.
16. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, et al. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65-81.
17. Hood DC, Zhang X. Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2000;100:115-137.
18. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1580-1587.
19. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, et al. Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:10-19.
20. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, et al. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1672-1681.
21. Hood DC, Zhang X, Winn BJ. Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma. 2003;12:3-15.
22. Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:29-39.
23. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:201-251.
24. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, et al. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:492-498.
25. Klistorner A, Graham SL. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2283-2299.
26. Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chen CS, et al. Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:34-40.
27. Armaly MF, Krueger DE, Maunder L, et al. Biostatistical analysis of the collaborative glaucoma study. I. Summary report of the risk factors for glaucomatous visual-field defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98:2163-2171.
28. Quigley HA, Enger C, Katz J, et al. Risk factors for the development of glaucomatous visual field loss in ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:644-649.
29. Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, et al. The Framingham Eye Study monograph: an ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetes retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24(Supp):355-610.
30. Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:701-713.
31. Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, et al. Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol. 2002;104:303-320.
32. Zhang X, Hood DC, Chen CS, et al. A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol. 2002;104:287-302.
33. Mansberger SL, Sample PA, Zangwill L, et al. Achromatic and short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with glaucomatous large cups. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1473-1477.
34. Polo V, Abecia E, Pablo LE, et al. Functional and structural measurements in a multifactorial glaucoma risk model. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:10-14.
35. Susanna R Jr, Galvao-Filho RP. Study of the contralateral eye in patients with glaucoma and a unilateral perimetric defect. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:34-37.
36. Horn FK, Wakili N, Junemann AM, et al. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002;240:658-665.
37. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:729-739.
38. Landers JA, Goldberg I, Graham SL. Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1705-1710.
39. Polo V, Abecia E, Pablo LE, et al. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and retinal nerve fiber layer evaluation in suspected cases of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1295-1298.
40. Demirel S, Johnson CA. Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:709-715.
41. Johnson CA, Brandt JD, Khong AM, et al. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:70-76.