Achromatic and short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with glaucomatous large cups

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 117, Issue 11, 1999, Pages 1473-1477

  Mansberger, Steven L ^a   Sample, Pamela A ^a   Zangwill, Linda ^a   Weinreb, Robert N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0032698995     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.117.11.1473     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Perkins ES. The Bedford glaucoma survey, I: long-term follow-up of borderline cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1973;57:179.
2. Hart WM, Yablonski M, Kass MA, Becker B. Multivariate analysis of the risk of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1455-1458.
3. Yablonski ME, Zimmerman TJ, Kass MA, Becker B. Prognostic significance of optic disc cupping in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;89: 585-592.
4. Johnson CA, Brandt JD, Khong AM. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113:70-76.
5. Tielsch JM Katz J, Singh K, et al. Population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134:1102-1110.
6. Sample PA, Taylor JDN, Martinez G, Lusky M, Weinreb RN. Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115: 225-233.
7. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993; 111:645-650.
8. Kahn HA, Leibowitz H, Ganley JP, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial: National Eye Institute workshop for ophthalmologists: standardizing diagnostic procedures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79:768-775.
9. Lichter PR. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1976;74:532-572.
10. Sample PA, Johnson CA, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Adams AJ. Optimum parameters for short-wavelength automated perimetry. J Glaucoma. 1996;5:375-383.
11. Healey PR, Mitchell P, Smith W, Wang JJ. Relationship between cup-disc ratio and optic disc diameter: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25(suppl1):S99-S101.
12. Heijl A, Molder H. Optic disc diameter influences the ability to detect glaucomatous disc damage. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993;71:122-129.
13. Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma. 1993;2:101-103.
14. Weinreb RN, Lusky M, Bartsch DU, Morsman D. Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111: 636-638.
15. Garway-Heath DF, Rudnicka AR, Lowe T. Measurement of optic disc size: equivalence of methods to correct for ocular magnification. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82: 643-649.
16. Ritch R, Shields MB, Krupin T. The Glaucomas. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1996:753-768.
17. Jonas JB, Zach FM, Gusek GC, Naumann GO. Pseudoglaucomatous physiologic large cups. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:137-144.
18. Peigne G, Schwartz B, Takamoto T. Differences of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness between normal and glaucoma-like discs (physiologic cups) matched by optic disc area. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993;71:451-457.
19. Tomita G, Takamolo T, Schwartz B. Glaucomalike discs without increased intraocular pressure or visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:496-504.
20. Wilson MR, Hertzmark E, Walker AM, Childs-Shaw K, Epstein DL. A case-control study of the risk factors in open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987; 105:1066-1071.
21. Sample PA, Madrid ME, Weinreb RN. Evidence for a variety of functional defects in glaucoma suspect eyes. J Glaucoma. 1994;3(suppl 1):S5-S18.
22. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Weinreb RN. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and motion automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1129-1133.
23. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
24. Asman P, Heijl A. Diffuse visual field loss and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1994;72:303-308.
25. Werner EB, Saheb N, Patel S. Lack of generalized constriction of affected visual field in patients with visual field defects in one eye. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982;17: 53-55.
26. Langerhorst CT, van der Berg TJ, Greve EL. Is there general reduction in sensitivity in glaucoma? Int Ophthalmol. 1993;13:31-35.
27. Drance SM. Diffuse visual field loss in open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:1533-1538.
28. Chi T, Ritch R, Sticker D, et al. Racial differences in optic nerve head parameters. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:836-839.
29. Beck RW, Messner DK, Musch DC, et al. Is there a racial difference in physiologic cup size? Ophthalmology. 1985;92:873-876.
30. Jonas JB, Fernandez MC, Naumann GO. Correlation of the optic disc size to glaucoma susceptibility. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:675-680.