Cracking the nutshell differently. Commentary on Mueller

Language Learning

Volumn 56, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages 271-277

  Lamers, Monique J A ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b Department of Linguistics ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746388902     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00364.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2001). The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. NeuroReport, 12, 3391-3394.
2. Gandour, J., Dzemidzic, M., Wong, D., Lowe, M., Tong, Y., Hsieh, L., et al. (2003). Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: An fMRI study. Human Brian Mapping, 20, 185-200.
3. Hoop, De, H., & Lamers, M. (2006). Incremental distinguishability of subject and object. In W. Abraham, N. Noonan (Series Eds.), L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, & P. de Swart (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Language Companion: Vol. 77. Series Case, Valency, and Transitivity (pp. 269-287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Lamers, M. (2005). The on-line resolution of subject-object ambiguities with and without case-marking in Dutch: Evidence from event related brain potentials. In M. Amberber & H. De Hoop (Eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case (pp. 251-293). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Lamers, M., & De Hoop, H. (2005). Animacy information in human sentence processing: An incremental optimization of interpretation approach. In H. Christiansen, P. R. Skadhauge, & J. Villadsen (Eds.), Constraint solving and language processing (pp. 158-171). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
7. Van Boxtel, S. (2005). Can the late bird catch the worm? Ultimate attainment in L2 syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
8. Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36, 559-570.
9. Yamamoto, M. (1999). Animacy and Reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.