The on-line resolution of subject-object ambiguities with and without case-marking in dutch: Evidence from event-related brain potentials

Competition and Variation in Natural Languages

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 251-293

  Lamers, Monique ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882337529     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-008044651-6/50012-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Bach E. The order of elements in a transformational grammar of German. Language 1962, 38:263-269.
2. Bierwisch M. The phonology of cliticization 1963, Foris, Dordrecht.
3. Bornkessel I. The argument dependency model: A neurocognitive Approach to incremental interpretation 2002, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MPI-Series in Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig.
4. Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M., Friederici A.D. Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies. Neuroreport 2002, 3:361-364.
5. Bornkessel I., Schlesewsky M., Friederici A.D. Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of syntax-independent information during parsing. Language and Cognitive Processes 2003, 18(3):269-298.
6. Brown C., Hagoort P. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1993, 5:34-44.
7. Brown C.M., van Berkum J.J., Hagoort P. Discourse before gender: An event-related brain potential study on the interplay of semantic and syntactic information during spoken language understanding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2000, 29(1):53-68.
8. Burnage G. Celex centre for lexical information: A guide for users 1990, SSn, Nijmegen.
9. Committee E.P.N. American electroencephalographic society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1991, 8:200-202.
10. De Swart, P. (this volume). Noun phrase resolution: The correlation between case and ambiguity.
11. De Vincenzi M. Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian 1991, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
12. Dowty D.R. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 1991, 67:547-619.
13. Dowty D.R. On the semantic content of the notion thematic role. Properties, types and meanings 1989, 69-130. Kluwer, Dordrecht. B. Partee, G. Chierchia, R. Turner (Eds.).
14. Fillmore C.J. The case for case. Universals in linguistic theory 1968, 1-88. Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York. E. Bach, R. Harms (Eds.).
15. Frazier L. Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1987, 5:519-559.
16. Frazier L. Processing Dutch sentence structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1993, 22:85-108.
17. Frazier L., Flores d'Arcais G.B. Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 1989, 28:331-344.
18. Friederici A.D. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 1995, 50:259-281.
19. Gorrell P. Parsing theory and phrase-order variation in German V2 clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1996, 25:135-156.
20. Gorrell P. The subject-before-object preference in German clauses. German sentence processing 2000, 25-64. Kluwer, Dordrecht. B. Hemforth, L. Konieczny (Eds.).
21. Gunter T.C., Stowe L.A., Mulder G. When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology 1997, 34:660-676.
22. Haegeman L. Introduction to government and binding theory 1991, Blackwell, Oxford.
23. Hagoort P. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(6):883-899.
24. Hagoort P., Brown C. Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. Perspectives on sentence processing 1994, 45-80. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. C.J.C. Clifton, L. Frazier, K. Rayner (Eds.).
25. Hagoort P., Brown C., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP-measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 1993, 8:439-483.
26. Hagoort P., Brown C.M. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:1531-1549.
27. Hemforth B. Kognitives parsing: Repräsentationen und verarbeitung grammatischen wissens 1993, Infix Verlag, Sact Augustin.
28. Kaan E. Processing subject-object ambiguities in Dutch 1997, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen.
29. Kaan E., Harris A., Gibson E., Holcomb P. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 2000, 15:159-201.
30. Kaan E., Swaab T.Y. Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: A comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. Cognitive Brain Research 2003, 17(3):621-635.
31. Kaan E., Swaab T.Y. Repair, revision and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15(1):98-110.
32. Kolk H.H.J., Chwilla D.J., Herten M., Oor P.J.W. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language 2003, 85:1-36.
33. Konieczny L., Hemforth B., Scheepers C., Strube G. The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes 1997, 12:307-348.
34. Koster J. Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis 1975, 1:111-136.
35. Kutas M., Federmeier K.D., Seana C., King J.W., Münte T.F. Language. Handbook of Psychophysiology (2nd ed.) 2000, 576-601. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. L.G. Tassinary (Ed.).
36. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing. Brain and Language 1980, 11:354-373.
37. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory and Cognition 1983, 11:539-550.
38. Kutas M., Petten C.K.V. Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. Handbook of Psycholinguistics 1994, 83-143. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.).
39. Lamers M.J.A. Sentence processing: Using syntactic, semantic and thermatic information 2001, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen.
40. Lee H. Markedness and word order freezing. Formal and Emperical Issues in Optimality-Theoretic Syntax 2001, 63-128. CSLI Publications, Stanford. P. Sells (Ed.).
41. MacDonald M.C. The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language 1993, 32:692-715.
42. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenburg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1994, 101:676-703.
43. McDonald J. Sentence interpretation processes: The influence of conflicting cues. Journal of Memory and Language 1987, 26:100-117.
44. McKinnon R., Ostehout L. Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes 1996, 11:495-523.
45. Mecklinger A., Schriefers H., Steinhauer K., Friederici A.D. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory and Cognition 1995, 23:477-494.
46. Münte T.F., Heinze H.J., Mangun G.R. Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:217-226.
47. Münte T.F., Urbach T.P., Düzel E., Kutas M. Event-related brain potentials in the study of human cognition and neuropsychology. Handbook of neuropsychology 2000, 139-235. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. F. Boller, J. Grafman, G. Rizzalotti (Eds.).
48. Nieuwborg E. De distributie van het onderwerp en het lijdend voorwerp 1968, Plantyn, Antwerpen.
49. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 1992, 31:1-22.
50. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J., Swinney D.A. Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 20:786-803.
51. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Even related potentials and language comprehension. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-related Brain Potentials and Cognition 1995, 171-215. Oxford University Press, New York. M.D. Rugg, M.G.H. Coles (Eds.).
52. Rösler F., Pechmann T., Streb J., Röder B., Hennighausen E. Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:150-176.
53. Schlesewsky M., Bornkessel I. On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension. Lingual 2004, 114:1213-1234.
54. Schmitt B., Lamers M., Münte T. Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14:333-346.
55. St George M., Kutas M., Martinez A., Sereno M.I. Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain 1999, 122:1317-1325.
56. Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Garnsey S.M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33:285-318.
57. van Berkum J.J., Hagoort P., Brown C. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1999, 11:657-671.
58. Weckerly J., Kutas M. An electrophysiological anlaysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 1999, 36:559-580.
59. Zeevat H. Freezing and marking. ILLC 2004, University of Amsterdam.
60. Zwart C.J.W. Dutch syntax: A minimalist approach 1993, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Groningen, Groningen.