Animacy information in human sentence processing: An incremental optimization of interpretation approach

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3438 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 158-171

  Lamers, Monique ^a   De Hoop, Helen ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION;

ANIMACY INFORMATION]; CONSTRAINT VIOLATIONS; HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 26844503742     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11424574_10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. de Hoop, H., Lamers, M.: Incremental distinguishability of subject and object. In Kulikov, L., Malchukov, A., de Swart, P., eds.: Case, Valency, and Transitivity. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (To appear)
2. Hendriks, P., de Hoop, H.: Optimality theoretic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (2001) 1-32
3. Lee, H.: Parallel optimization in case systems. In Butt, M., King, T., eds.: Inside and Out. CSLI, Stanford (2003)
4. Zeevat, H.: Freezing and marking. Unpublished manuscript University of Amsterdam (2004)
5. Frazier, L., Rayner, K.: Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 26 (1987) 505-526
6. Gibson, E.: Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68 (1998) 1-76
7. MacWhinney, B.: Models of the emergence of language. Annual Review of Psychology 49 (1998) 199-227
8. Lamers, M.: Sentence processing: using syntactic, semantic, and thematic information. PhD thesis, University of Groningen (2001)
9. Mak, P., Vonk, W., Schrieffers, H.: The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47 (2002) 50-68
10. McDonald, J.: Sentence interpretation processes: The influence of conflicting cues. Journal of Memory and Language 26 (1987) 100-117
11. Smolensky, P.: Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In Rummelhart, D., McClelland, J., eds.: Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the microstructure of Cognition. Volume 1. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)
12. MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., Kliegl, R.: Cue validity and sentence interpretation in english, german, and italian. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 23 (1984) 127-150
13. Blache, P.: Constraints, linguistic theories and natural language processing. In Christodoulakis, D., ed.: Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Volume 1835. Springer (2000)
14. Prince, A., Smolensky, P.: Optimality: From neural networks to universal grammar. Science 275 (1997) 1604-1610
15. Comrie, B.: Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1989)
16. Aissen, J.: Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21 (2003) 435-483
17. Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I.: On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension. Lingua 114 (2004) 1213-1234
18. Kutas, M., Van Petten, C.: Psycholinguistics electrified. In Gernsbacher, M.A., ed.: Handbook of psycholinguistics. Academic Press, New York (1994) 83-143
19. Garnsey, S.: Event-related brain potentials in the study of language. Language and Cognitive Processes 8 (1993) 337-640 Special Issue.
20. Lamers, M.: Resolving subject-object ambiguities with and without case: evidence from erps. In Amberber, M., de Hoop, H., eds.: Competition and variation in natural languages: the case for case. Elsevier (To appear)
21. Weckerly, J., Kutas, M.: An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. Psychophysiology 36 (1999) 559-570