Developing Itô stochastic differential equation models for neuronal signal transduction pathways

Computational Biology and Chemistry

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 280-291

  Manninen, Tiina ^a   Linne, Marja Leena ^a   Ruohonen, Keijo ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Chemical Langevin equation; Gillespie stochastic simulation algorithm; It stochastic differential equation; Neuronal signal transduction

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL LANGEVIN EQUATION; GILLESPIE STOCHASTIC SIMULATION ALGORITHM; ITÔ STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION; NEURONAL SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ALGORITHMS; BIOCHEMISTRY; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEUROLOGY; STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING;

CYTOLOGY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICS; TIME;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33746373126     PISSN: 14769271     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2006.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arkin A.P. Synthetic cell biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12 (2001) 638-644
2. Bentele M., and Eils R. General stochastic hybrid method for the simulation of chemical reaction processes in cells. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3082 (2005) 248-251
3. Bhalla U.S., and Iyengar R. Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283 (1999) 381-387
4. Bliss T.V.P., and Collingridge G.L. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361 (1993) 31-39
5. Burrage K., Burrage P.M., and Tian T. Numerical methods for strong solutions of stochastic differential equations: an overview. Proc. R. Soc. London A 460 (2004) 373-402
6. Burrage, K., Tian, T., 2004. Poisson Runge-Kutta methods for chemical reaction systems. In: Lu, Y.Y., Sun, W., Tang, T. (Eds.), Scientific Computing and Application, Advances in Computation, Theory, Nova Science, Beijing/New York, pp. 82-96.
7. Burrage K., Tian T., and Burrage P. A multi-scaled approach for simulating chemical reaction systems. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 85 (2004) 217-234
8. Cao Y., Gillespie D.T., and Petzold L.R. Avoiding negative populations in explicit Poisson tau-leaping. J. Chem. Phys. 123 (2005) 054104
9. Cao Y., Gillespie D.T., and Petzold L.R. The slow-scale stochastic simulation algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005) 014116
10. Cao Y., Li H., and Petzold L. Efficient formulation of the stochastic simulation algorithm for chemically reacting systems. J. Chem. Phys. 121 9 (2004) 4059-4067
11. Chen K.-C., Wang T.-Y., Tseng H.-H., Huang C.-Y.F., and Kao C.-Y. A stochastic differential equation model for quantifying transcriptional regulatory network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics 21 12 (2005) 2883-2890
12. De Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J. Comput. Biol. 9 1 (2002) 67-103
13. De Schutter E., and Smolen P. Calcium dynamics in large neuronal models. In: Koch C., and Segev I. (Eds). Methods in Neuronal Modeling: From Ions to Networks. second ed. (1998), The MIT Press, Cambridge 211-250
14. 2+ concentration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89 (1992) 9895-9899
15. Elf J., and Ehrenberg M. Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation. Genome Res. 13 (2003) 2475-2484
16. Franks K.M., and Sejnowski T.J. Complexity of calcium signaling in synaptic spines. Bioessays 24 12 (2002) 1130-1144
17. Gibson M.A., and Bruck J. Efficient exact stochastic simulation of chemical systems with many species and many channels. J. Phys. Chem. A 104 (2000) 1876-1889
18. Gillespie D.T. A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comput. Phys. 22 4 (1976) 403-434
19. Gillespie D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 81 25 (1977) 2340-2361
20. Gillespie D.T. Approximating the master equation by Fokker-Planck-type equations for single-variable chemical systems. J. Phys. Chem. 72 10 (1980) 5363-5370
21. Gillespie D.T. A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation. Physica A 188 (1992) 404-425
22. Gillespie D.T. The multivariate Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations. Am. J. Phys. 64 10 (1996) 1246-1257
23. Gillespie D.T. The chemical Langevin equation. J. Chem. Phys. 113 1 (2000) 297-306
24. Gillespie D.T. Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems. J. Chem. Phys. 115 4 (2001) 1716-1733
25. Gillespie D.T. The chemical Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations for the reversible isomerization reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A 106 20 (2002) 5063-5071
26. Gillespie D.T., and Petzold L.R. Improved leap-size selection for accelerated stochastic simulation. J. Chem. Phys. 119 16 (2003) 8229-8234
27. Haseltine E.L., and Rawlings J.B. Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 117 15 (2002) 6959-6969
28. Higham D.J. An algorithmic introduction to numerical simulation of stochastic differential equations. SIAM Rev. 43 3 (2001) 525-546
29. Kloeden P., and Platen E. Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. third ed. (1999), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
30. Kummer U., Krajnc B., Pahle J., Green A.K., Dixon C.J., and Marhl M. Transitions from stochastic to deterministic behavior in calcium oscillations. Biophys. J. 89 (2005) 1603-1611
31. Lawrie A.M., Graham M.E., Thorn P., Gallacher D.V., and Burgoyne R.D. Synchronous calcium oscillations in cerebellar granule cells in culture mediated by NMDA receptors. Neuroreport 4 5 (1993) 539-542
32. Le Novère N., and Shimizu T.S. StochSim: modelling of stochastic biomolecular processes. Bioinformatics 17 6 (2001) 575-576
33. Lemerle C., Di Ventura B., and Serrano L. Space as the final frontier in stochastic simulations of biological systems. FEBS Lett. 579 (2005) 1789-1794
34. Manninen T., Linne M.-L., and Ruohonen K. Incorporating stochasticity into deterministic differential equation models for neuronal signal transduction. In: Manninen T., Linne M.-L., and Yli-Harja O. (Eds). Proceedings of the 3rd TICSP Workshop on Computational Systems Biology, WCSB 2005. Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland (June 2005) 59-60
35. Manninen T., Linne M.-L., and Ruohonen K. A novel approach to model neuronal signal transduction using stochastic differential equations. Neurocomputing 69 (2006) 1066-1069
36. Manninen T., Saarinen A., and Linne M.-L. Simulation study of differential equation model for protein kinase C signaling, Report 3 (2004), Institute of Signal Processing and Institute of Mathematics, Tampere University of Technology, Finland. http://www.cs.tut.fi/∼manninet/Report2004.pdf
37. McCollum J.M., Peterson G.D., Cox C.D., Simpson M.L., and Samatova N.F. The sorting direct method for stochastic simulation of biochemical systems with varying reaction execution behavior. Comput. Biol. Chem. 30 1 (2006) 39-49
38. Milstein G.N., Platen E., and Schurz H. Balanced implicit methods for stiff stochastic systems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35 3 (1998) 1010-1019
39. Øksendal B. Stochastic Differential Equations. fifth ed. (1998), Springer-Verlag, Berlin
40. Pettinen A., Aho T., Smolander O.-P., Manninen T., Saarinen A., Taattola K.-L., Yli-Harja O., and Linne M.-L. Simulation tools for biochemical networks: evaluation of performance and usability. Bioinformatics 21 3 (2005) 357-363
41. Puchalka J., and Kierzek A.M. Bridging the gap between stochastic and deterministic regimes in the kinetic simulations of the biochemical reaction networks. Biophys. J. 86 (2004) 1357-1372
42. Rao C.V., and Arkin A.P. Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: application to the Gillespie algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 118 11 (2003) 4999-5010
43. Rathinam M., Petzold L.R., Cao Y., and Gillespie D.T. Stiffness in stochastic chemically reacting systems: the implicit tau-leaping method. J. Chem. Phys. 119 24 (2003) 12784-12794
44. Resat H., Wiley H.S., and Dixon D.A. Probability-weighted dynamic Monte Carlo method for reaction kinetics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001) 11026-11034
45. Sivakumaran S., Hariharaputran S., Mishra J., and Bhalla U.S. The Database of Quantitative Cellular Signaling: management and analysis of chemical kinetic models of signaling networks. Bioinformatics 19 3 (2003) 408-415
46. Slepchenko B.M., Schaff J.C., Carson J.H., and Loew L.M. Computational cell biology: spatiotemporal simulation of cellular events. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 31 (2002) 423-441
47. Tan C.M., Somani S., and Dhar P. Modeling and simulation of biochemical systems with stochasticity. In Silico Biol. 4 3 (2004) 293-309
48. Tang Y., and Othmer H.G. Frequency encoding in excitable systems with applications to calcium oscillations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92 (1995) 7869-7873
49. Tian T., and Burrage K. Binomial leap methods for simulating stochastic chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 121 21 (2004) 10356-10364
50. Tsuruno, S., Hirano, T., 2005. Transient activation of PKCα in the induction of cerebellar LTD. In: Neuroscience 2005 Abstract Viewer and Itinerary Planner, Program No. 383.8, online. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC, USA.
51. Turner T.E., Schnell S., and Burrage K. Stochastic approaches for modelling in vivo reactions. Comput. Biol. Chem. 28 (2004) 165-178
52. Vasudeva K., and Bhalla U.S. Adaptive stochastic-deterministic chemical kinetic simulations. Bioinformatics 20 1 (2004) 78-84