Finding the Global Groove: Theorising and analysing dynamic reader positioning using Appraisal, corpus, and a concordancer

Critical Discourse Studies

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 143-163

  Coffin, Caroline ^a   O'Halloran, Kieran ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

APPRAISAL; corpus linguistics; critical discourse analysis; dynamic reader positioning; evaluative meaning; explanatory critique; news texts

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746279308     PISSN: 17405904     EISSN: 17405912     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17405900500283607     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso.
2. Channell, J. (2000). Corpus-based analysis of evaluative lexis. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 38-55). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Coffin, C. (2002). The voices of history: Theorising the interpersonal semantics of historical discourses. Text, 22, 50.3-528.
5. Coffin, C. (2003). Reconstruing the past: Settlement or invasion? In J. R. Martin & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical approaches to the discourse of history (pp. 21-246). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Oxford: Polity.
7. Fairciough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman. Gouveia, C. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and the development of the new science. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 47-62). Basingstoke, UK: Paigrave.
8. Gouveia C. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and the development of the new science. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 47-62). Basingstoke, UK: Paigrave.
9. Graham, P. (2002). Predication and propagation: A method for analysing evaluative meanings in technology policy. Text, 22, 227-268.
10. Kavanagh, T., & Lea, M. (2003). The same two you, John. The Sun. Retrieved 6 June, 2003, from http://www.thesun.co.uk
11. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Resources for attitudinal meaning. Functions of Language, 5, 33-56.
12. Louw, B. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? In M. Baker, G. Francis, & E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: in honour of John M. Sinclair (pp. 157-176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Macken-Horarik, M. (2003a). APPRAISAL and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text, Special issue, Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation, 23, 285-312.
14. Macken-Horarik, M. (2003b). Envoi: Intractable issues in appraisal analysis? Text, Special Issue, Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation, 23, 313-319.
15. Martin, J. R. (1996). Evaluating disruption: Symbolising theme in junior secondary narrative. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 124-171). London: Longman.
16. Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3-39). London: Pinter.
17. Martin, J. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp. 142-175). Oxford: Oxford University Press
18. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse. London: Continuum.
19. Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistics. London: Routledge.
20. O'Halloran, K. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and language cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
21. Pascoc-Watson, G. (2003). Two million jobs in peril. The Sun. Retrieved May 27, 2003, from http://www.thesun.co.uk
22. White, P. R. R. (2003a). Appraisal: The language of evaluation and stance. In C. Verschucren, J. J.Östman, J. Blommaert, & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1-27). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. White, P. R. R. (2003b). Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text, Special Issue, Negotiating Heteroglossia: Social Perspectives on Evaluation, 23, 259-284.
24. Whiteley, P. (2000, April 11). Paper politics. The Guardian. Retrieved December 2, 2004, from http: //www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Articic/0,4273, 3984707,00.html
25. Widdowson, H. G. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4, 157-172.
26. Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21, 3-25.