Variation in the suitability of Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine) to feeding by three pine defoliators, Panolis flammea, Neodiprion sertifer and Zeiraphera diniana

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 11-17

  Trewhella, K E ^a   Leather, S R ^b,d   Day, K R ^c  

^a FOREST RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

^d Department of Biology ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFOLIATION; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; PEST SPECIES; SURVIVAL;

UNITED KINGDOM;

DIPRIONIDAE; HYMENOPTERA; LEPIDOPTERA; NEODIPRION SERTIFER; NOCTUIDAE; PANOLIS FLAMMEA; PINUS CONTORTA; TORRICIDAE; ZEIRAPHERA DINIANA;

EID: 0034107653     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0418.2000.00432.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. AREND, J. L.; SMITH, S. H.; SPURR, S. H.; WRIGHT, J. H., 1961: Jack pine geographic variation: five-year results from lower Michigan tests. Paper Michigan Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 46, 219-238.
2. BENJAMIN, D. M.; LARSIN, J. B.; DROOZ, A. T., 1955: The European pine sawfly on the Henderson State Forest, Illinois, with notes on its biology and control. J. For. 53, 359-362.
3. BEVAN, D., 1987: Forest Insects. Forestry Commission Handbook 1. London: HMSO.
4. BJÖRKMAN, C.; GREF, R., 1993: Survival of pine sawflies in cocoon stage in relation to resin acid content of larval food. J. Chem. Ecol. 19, 2881-2890.
5. CHEW, F. S., 1977: Coevolution of Pierid butterflies and their cruciferous food plants. II. The distribution of eggs on potential food plants. Evolution 31, 568-579.
6. CLANCY, K. M.; PRICE, P. W., 1987: Rapid herbivore growth enhances enemy attack: sublethal plant defences remain a paradox. Ecology 68, 733-737.
7. CODELLA, JR, S. G.; FOGAL, W. H.; RAFFA, K. F., 1991: The effect of host variability on growth and performance of the introduced pine sawfly, Diprion similis. Can. J. For. Res. 21, 1668-1674.
8. DAY, K., 1984: Phenology, Polymorphism and insect-plant relationships of the larch budmoth, Zeiraphera diniana (Guenee) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), on alternative conifer hosts in Britain. Bull. Ent. Res. 74, 47-64.
9. DAY, K.; LEATHER, S. R.; LINES, R., 1991: Damage by Zeiraphera diniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) of various provenances. For. Ecol. Manag. 44, 133-145.
10. DENT, D., 1995: Integrated Pest Management. London: Chapman & Hall.
11. DIAWARA, M. M.; WISEMAN, B. R.; ISENHOUR, D. J., 1991: Mechanisms of whorl feeding resistance to fall armyworm among converted sorghum accessions. Ent. Exp. et Appl. 60, 225-231.
12. DICKE, M.; SABELIS, M. W.; TAKABAYASHI, J.; BRUIN, J.; POSTHUMUS, M. A., 1990: Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelochemicals: prospects for application in pest control. J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 3091-3118.
13. FINNEY, D. J.; LATSCHA, R.; BENNETT, B. M.; Hsu, P., 1963: Tables for Testing Significance in a 2 × 2 Table. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. FISHER, R. A., 1920: Some remarks on the methods formulated in a recent article on 'the quantitative analysis of plant growth'. Ann. Appl. Biol. 7, 367-372.
15. GODFRAY, H. C. J.; HASSELL, M. P.; HOLT, J., 1994: The population dynamic consequences of phenological asynchrony between parasitoids and their hosts. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 1-10.
16. HENSON, W. R.; O'NEIL, L. C.; NERGEN, F., 1970: Natural Variation in Susceptibility of Pinus to Neodiprion Sawflies as a Basis for the Development of a Breeding Scheme for Resistant Trees. Bulletin 78. Yale, USA: Yale University School of Forestry.
17. HULME, M. A., 1995: Resistance by translocated sitka spruce to damage by Pissodes strobi (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) related to tree phenology. J. Econ. Ent. 88, 1525-1530.
18. JACTEL, H.; KLEINHENTZ, M.; MARPEAUBEZARD, A.; MARIONPOLL, F.; MENASSIEU, P.; BURBAN, C., 1996: Terpene variations in maritime pine constitutive oleoresin related to host tree selection by Dioryctria sylvestrella Ratz (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 22, 1037-1050.
19. KAPLER, J. E.; BENJAMIN, D. M., 1960: The biology and ecology of the red pine sawfly in Wisconsin. For. Sci. 6, 253-268.
20. KISS, G. K.; YANCHUK, A. D., 1991: Preliminary evaluation of genetic variation of weevil resistance in interior spruce in British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 21, 230-234.
21. LEATHER, S. R., 1985a: Oviposition preferences in relation to larval growth rate and survival in the pine beauty moth, Panolis flammea. Ecol. Ent. 10, 213-217.
22. LEATHER, S. R., 1985b: Factors Determining the Pest Status of the Pine Beauty Moth. Panolis flammea (D & S). III Research initiated and undertaken during the period 1 September 1984 to 31 August 1985. Internal Report. Roslin, Scotland: Forestry Commission.
23. LEATHER, S. R., 1996: Resistance to foliage-feeding insects in conifers: implications for pest management. Integ. Pest Manag. Rev. 1, 163-180.
24. LEATHER, S. R.; WALSH, P. J., 1993: Sub-lethal plant defences: the paradox remains. Oecologia 93, 153-155.
25. LEATHER, S. R.; FELLOWES, M. D. E.; HAYMAN, G. R. F.; MAXEN, J. S., 1997: The influence of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) provenance on the development and survival of larvae of the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 87, 75-80.
26. LEATHER, S. R.; BEARE, J. A.; COOKE, R. C. A.; FELLOWES, M. D. E., 1998: Are differences in life history parameters of the pine beauty moth Panolis flammea modified by host plant quality or gender? Ent. Exp. Et Appl. 87, 237-243.
27. MORAN, N. A.; HAMILTON, W. D., 1980: Low nutritive quality as a defence against herbivores. J. Theor. Biol. 86, 247-254.
28. NGUESSAN, F. K.; QUISENBERRY, S. S.; CROUGHAN, T. P., 1994: Evaluation of rice anther culture lines for tolerance to the rice water weevil (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Env. Ent. 23, 331-336.
29. PRICE, P. W.; BOUTON, C. E.; GROSS, P.; MCPHERON, B. A.; THOMPSON, J. N.; WEISS, A. E., 1980: Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 41-65.
30. QUIRING, D. T., 1993: Influence of intra-tree variation in time of budburst of white spruce on herbivory and the behaviour and survivorship of Zeiraphera canadensis. Ecol. Ent. 18, 353-364.
31. QUIRING, D. T.; BUTTERWORTH, E. W., 1994: Genotype and environment interact to influence acceptability of white spruce for a specialist herbivore, Zeiraphera canadensis. Ecol. Ent. 19, 230-238.
32. RADFORD, P. J., 1967: Growth analysis formulae - their use and abuse. Crop Sci. 7, 171-175.
33. RAUPP, M. J.; DENNO, R. F., 1983: Leaf age as a predictor of herbivore distribution and abundance. In: Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. Ed. by DENNO, R. F.; MCCLURE, M. S. New York: Academic Press. 91-124
34. RAUSHER, M. D., 1979: Larval habitat suitability and oviposition preference in three related butterflies. Ecology 60, 503-511.
35. SANTAMOUR, F. S.; ZINKEL, D. F., 1976a: Weevil-induced resin crystallization related to resin acids in eastern white pine. In: Proceedings of the 23rd North-eastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 4-7h August 1975, New Brunswick, NJ. USA, USDA Forest Service, 12-16.
36. SANTAMOUR, F. S.; ZINKEL, D. F., 1976b: Inheritance of resin acids in an interspecific white pine cross. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Northeastern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, 4-7 August 1975, New Brunswick, NJ. USA, USDA Forest Service, 17-21.
37. SMITH, C. M.; SCHOTZKO, D.; ZEMETRE, R. S.; SOUZA, E. J.; SCHROEDER-TEETER, S., 1991: Identification of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) resistance in wheat. J. Econ. Ent. 84, 328-332.
38. STEACY, K. E., 1993: Resistance to insects in lodgepole pine: interactions between Panolis flammea, Neodiprion sertifer and Zeiraphera diniana. PhD Thesis. Coleraine, Northern Ireland: University of Ulster.
39. STEINER, K., 1974: Genetic differences in resistance of Scotch pine to Eastern pine-shoot borer. Gt. Lakes Ent. 7, 103-107.
40. TOMLIN, E. S.; BORDEN, J. H., 1994: Relationship between leader morphology and resistance or susceptibility of sitka spruce to the white pine weevil. Can. J. For. Res. 24, 810-816.
41. TOMLIN, E. S.; BORDEN, J. H.; PIERCE, H. D., 1996: Relationship between cortical resin acids and resistance of sitka spruce to the white pine weevil Pissodes strobi. Can. J. Bot. 74, 599-606.
42. TREWHELLA, K. E.; LEATHER, S. R.; DAY, K. R., 1997: The effect of constitutive resistance in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) on oviposition by three pine feeding herbivores. Bull. Ent. Res. 87, 81-87.
43. WAGNER, M. R.; ZHANG, Z. Y., 1993: Host plant traits associated with resistance of Ponderosa pine to the sawfly Neodiprion fulviceps. Can. J. For. Res. 23, 839-845.
44. WATT, A. D.; LEATHER, S. R., 1988: The pine beauty in Scottish lodgepole pine plantations. In: Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations: Patterns, Causes, Implications. Ed. by BERRYMAN, A.A. New York: Plenum Press. 243-266.
45. WATT, A. D.; LEATHER, S. R.; FORREST, G. I., 1991: The effect of previous defoliation of pole-stage lodgepole pine on plant chemistry, and on the growth and survival of pine beauty moth (Panolis flammea) larvae. Oecologia 86, 31-35.
46. WIKLUND, C., 1975: The evolutionary relationships between adult oviposition preference and larval host range in Papilio machaon. Oecologia 18, 185-197.
47. WILKINSON, R. C., 1980: Relationship between cortical monoterpenes and susceptibility of Eastern white pine to white pine weevil attack. For. Sci. 26, 581-589.
48. WILKINSON, R. C., 1983: Leader and growth characteristics of Eastern white pine associated with white pine weevil attack susceptibility. Can. J. For. Res. 13, 78-84.
49. WRIGHT, J. W.; WILSON, L. F., 1972: Genetic differences in Scotch pine resistance to pine root collar weevil. Research report 159. Town: Michigan State University Agric Exp Station. 5 pp.
50. WRIGHT, J. W.; WILSON, L. F.; RANDALL, W. K., 1967: Differences among Scotch pine varieties in susceptibility to European pine sawfly. For. Sci. 13, 175-181.