Usage and perceived impact of data warehouses: A study in Korean financial companies

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 297-315

  Hong, Soongoo ^a   Katerattanakul, Pairin ^b   Hong, Suk Ki ^c   Cao, Qing ^d  

^a Dong A University   (South Korea)

^b WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Dankook University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical success factors; Data warehouse; IS success; Technology acceptance; User's perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746227345     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622006001927     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. L. Chen, K. Soliman, E. Mao and M. Frolick, Measuring user satisfaction with data warehouses: An exploratory study, Information & Management 37(3) (2000) 103-110.
2. S. Crofts, How data warehousing turns information into competitive advantage, Fortune 136(4) (1997) S1-S9.
3. F. D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3) (1989) 319-340.
4. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi and P. R. Warshaw, User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35(8) (1989) 982-1003.
5. F. D. Davis and V. Venkatesh, A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45(1) (1996) 19-45.
6. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4) (2003) 9-30.
7. W. H. DeLone and E. R. McLean, Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research 3(1) (1992) 60-95.
8. M. T. Dishaw and D. M. Strong, Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs, Information & Management 36(1) (1999) 9-21.
9. J. Etezadi-Amoli and A. F. Farhoomand, A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance, Information & Management 30(2) (1996) 65-73.
10. R. F. Falk and N. B. Miller, A Primer for Soft Modeling (The University of Akron Press, Akron, OH, 1992).
11. C. Fornell and D. Larcker, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1) (1981) 39-50.
12. D. Gefen, What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness, Journal of Management Information Systems 21(1) (2004) 263-288.
13. D. Gefen and D. Straub, The relative importance of perceived ease-of-use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 1(8) (2000) 1-30.
14. D. L. Goodhue and R. L. Thompson, Task-technology fit and individual performance, MIS Quarterly 19(2) (1995) 213-233.
15. P. Gray and H. J. Watson, Decision Support in the Data Warehouse (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998).
16. T. Guimaraes and M. Igbaria, Client/server system success: Exploring the human side, Decision Sciences 28(4) (1987) 851-875.
17. J. Hair, R. Tatham, R. Anderson and W. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis 5th Edition (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998).
18. M. Igbaria and M. Tan, The consequences of the information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance, Information & Management 32(3) (1997) 113-121.
19. M. Igbaria, N. Zinatelli, P. Cragg and A. Cavaye, Personal computing acceptance factors on small firms: A structural equation model, MIS Quarterly 21(3) (1997) 279-302.
20. J. Jurison, The temporal nature of IS benefits: A longitudinal study, Information & Management 30(2) (1996) 75-79.
21. J. Karlsen, J. Andersen, L. Birkely and E. Ødegård, What characterizes successful IT projects, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 4(4) (2005) 525-540.
22. W. J. Kettinger and C. C. Lee, Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function, Decision Sciences 25(5-6) (1995) 737-766.
23. P. Legris, J. Ingham and P. Collerette, Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management 40(3) (2003) 191-204.
24. S. M. Lee, S. Hong and P. Katerattanakul, Impact of data warehousing on organizational performance of retiling firms, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 3(1) (2004) 61-79.
25. E. Y. Li, Perceived importance of information system success factors: A meta analysis of group differences, Information & Management 32(1) (1997) 15-28.
26. R. Little and M. Gibson, Perceived influences on implementing data warehousing, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 29(4) (2003) 290-296.
27. H. C. Lucas and V. K. Spitler, Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations, Decision Sciences 30(2) (1999) 291-311.
28. R. Mason, Measuring information output: A communication systems approach, Information & Management 1(5) (1978) 219-234.
29. F. McFadden and H. Watson, The world of data warehousing: Issues and opportunities, Journal of Data Warehousing 1(July) (1996) 61-71.
30. J. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978).
31. P. Seddon and M. Kiew, A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success, in Proc. Int. Conf. Information Systems (Vancouver, Canada, 14-17 December), pp. 99-110.
32. B. Shin, An exploratory investigation of system success factors in data warehousing, Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4(6) (2003) 141-170.
33. D. Straub, Validating instruments in MIS Research, MIS Quarterly 13(2) (1989) 146-169.
34. S. Taylor and P. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models, Information Systems Research 6(2) (1995) 144-176.
35. J. Teng and K. Calhoun, Organizational computing as a facilitator of operational and managerial decision making: An exploratory study of managers' perceptions, Decision Sciences 27(4) (1996) 673-710.
36. T. S. H Teo and P. K. Wong, An empirical study of the performance impact of computerization in the retail industry, Omega - The International Journal, of Management Science 26(5) (1998) 611-621.
37. G. Torkzadeh and W. Doll, The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work, Omega - The International Journal of Management Science 27(3) (1999) 327-339.
38. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46(2) (2000) 186-204.
39. H. Watson, D. L. Goodhue and B. H. Wixom, The benefits of data warehousing: Why some organizations realize exceptional payoffs, Information & Management 39(6) (2002) 491-502.
40. H. Watson, T. Ariyachandra and R. Matyska, Data warehousing stages of growth, Information Systems Management 18(3) (2001) 42-50.
41. H. Watson, D. Annino, B. Wixom, L. Avery and M. Rutherford, Current practices in data warehousing, Information Systems Management 18(1) (2001) 47-55.
42. H. Watson, J. Gerard, L. Gonzalez, M. Haywood and D. Fenton, Data warehousing failures: Case studies and findings, Journal of Data Warehousing 4(Spring) (1999) 44-55.
43. G. Whyte, A. Bytheway and C. Edwards, Understanding user perceptions of information system success, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 6(1) (1997) 35-68.
44. B. Wixom and P. Todd, A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance, Information Systems Research 16(1) (2005) 85-102.
45. B. Wixom and H. Watson, An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success, MIS Quarterly 25(1) (2001) 17-41.
46. J. Wu and S. Wang, What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model, Information & Management 42(5) (2005) 719-729.
47. K. Yuthas and S. Young, Material matters: Assessing the effectiveness of materials management IS, Information & Management 33(3) (1998) 115-124.