Advanced behavioural screening: automated home cage ethology

Drug Discovery Today: Technologies

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 231-237

  Spruijt, Berry M ^a,b   DeVisser, Leonie ^a,b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APOMORPHINE; BENZODIAZEPINE DERIVATIVE; COCAINE; SEROTONIN;

ACCURACY; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; AUTOMATION; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ETHNOLOGY; GENOMICS; MAZE TEST; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NONHUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PHENOTYPE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 33746191470     PISSN: 17406749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2006.06.010     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. McClearn G.E. Nature and nurture: Interaction and coaction. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part B: Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 124B (2004) 124-130
2. Cooper R.M., and Zubek J.P. Effects of enriched and restricted early environments on the learning ability of bright and dull rats. Can. J. Psychol. 12 (1958) 159-164
3. Würbel H. Behavioral phenotyping enhanced - beyond (environmental) standardization. Genes Brain Behav. 1 (2002) 3-8
4. Gerlai R. Phenomics: Fiction or the future?. Trends Neurosci. 25 (2002) 506-509
5. Wahlsten D., et al. In search of a better mouse test. Trends Neurosci. 26 (2003) 132-136
6. Brunner D., et al. In need of high-throughput behavioral systems. Drug Discov. Today 7 (2002) pp. 107-S112
7. Wolfer D.P., et al. Laboratory animal welfare cage enrichment and mouse behaviour. Nature 432 (2004) 821-822
8. Lathe R. The individuality of mice. Genes Brain Behav. 3 (2004) 317-327
9. Hendrie C.A., and Weiss S.M. The development of an animal model of panic with predictive and face validity. In: Cooper S.J., and Hendrie C.A. (Eds). Ethology and psychopharmacology (1994), John Wiley & Sons Ltd 85-109
10. Blanchard D.C., et al. Mouse defensive behaviors: Pharmacological and behavioral assays for anxiety and panic. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25 (2001) 205-218
11. van Ree J.M., and Wolterink G. Injection of low doses of apomorphine into the nucleus accumbens of rats reduces locomotor activity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 72 (1981) 107-111
12. Tecott L.H., and Nestler E.J. Neurobehavioral assessment in the information age. Nat. Neurosci. 7 (2004) 462-466
13. Crawley J.N. What's wrong with my mouse? Behavioural phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice (2000), Wiley-Liss
14. Kopp C., et al. Comparative study of emotional behaviour in three inbred strains of mice. Behav. Process. 47 (1999) 161-174
15. Griebel G., et al. Differences in anxiety-related behaviours and in sensitivity to diazepam in inbred and outbred strains of mice. Psychopharmacology 148 (2000) 164-170
16. Carola V., et al. Evaluation of the elevated plus-maze and open-field tests for the assessment of anxiety-related behaviour in inbred mice. Behav. Brain Res. 134 (2002) 49-57
17. Trullas R., and Skolnick P. Differences in fear motivated behaviors among inbred mouse strains. Psychopharmacology 111 (1993) 323-331
18. Avgustinovich D.F., et al. Features of the genetically defined anxiety in mice. Behav. Genet. 30 (2000) 101-109
19. Crawley J.N., et al. Behavioral phenotypes of inbred mouse strains: Implications and recommendations for molecular studies. Psychopharmacology 132 (1997) 107-124
20. Crabbe J.C., et al. Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science 284 (1999) 1670-1672
21. Wahlsten D.M., et al. Different data from different labs: Lessons form studies of gene-environment interaction (2003), Wiley Periodicals pp. 283-311
22. Rampon C., et al. Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in ca1 nmdar1-knockout mice. Nat. Neurosci. 3 (2000) 238-244
23. Miczek K.A., et al. Temporal and sequential patterns of agonistic behavior: effects of alcohol, anxiolytics and psychomotor stimulants. Psychopharmacology 97 (1989) 149-151
24. Mitchell P.J. Prediction of antidepressant activity from ethological analysis of agonistic behaviour in rats. In: Cooper S.J., and Hendrie C.A. (Eds). Ethology and psychopharmacology (1994), John Wiley & Sons Ltd 85-109
25. Rodgers R.J., and Cole J.C. The elevated plus-maze: pharmacology, methodology and ethology. In: Cooper S.J., and Hendrie C.A. (Eds). Ethology and psychopharmacology (1994), John Wiley & Sons Ltd 85-109
26. Harkin A., et al. Test conditions influence the response to a drug challenge in rodents. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 65 (2000) 389-398
27. Carey R.J., et al. Acute and chronic cocaine behavioral effects in novel versus familiar environments: open-field familiarity differentiates cocaine locomotor stimulant effects from cocaine emotional behavioral effects. Behav. Brain Res. 158 (2005) 321-330
28. Joyce D., and Mrosovsky N. Eating, drinking and activity in rats following 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-htp) administration. Psychopharmacologia 5 (1964) 417-423
29. Gerlai R., and Clayton N.S. Analysing hippocampal function in transgenic mice: An ethological perspective. Trends Neurosci. 22 (1999) 47-51
30. Rogers D.C., et al. Behavioral and functional analysis of mouse phenotype: SHIRPA, a proposed protocol for comprehensive phenotype assessment. Mamm. Genome 8 (1997) 711-713
31. Spruijt B.M., and Gispen W.H. Prolonged animal observation by use of digitized videodisplays. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behavior. 19 (1983) 765-769
32. Galsworthy M.J., et al. A comparison of wild-caught wood mice and bank voles in the intellicage: Assessing exploration, daily activity patterns and place learning paradigms. Behav. Brain Res. 157 (2005) 211-217
33. DeVisser L., et al. Automated home cage observations as a tool to measure the effects of wheel running on cage floor locomotion. Behav. Brain Res. 160 (2005) 382-388
34. DeVisser, L. et al. Novel approach to the behavioural characterization of inbred mice: automated home cage observations. Genes Brain Behav. (in press)
35. Belongie S., et al. Monitoring animal behavior in the smart vivarium. 5th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research. 30 August-2 September, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2005)
36. van de Weerd H.A., et al. Validation of a new system for the automatic registration of behaviour in mice and rats. Behav. Process. 53 (2001) 11-20
37. Quinn L.P., et al. LABORAS™: initial pharmacological validation of a system allowing continuous monitoring of laboratory rodent behaviour. J. Neurosc. Methods 130 (2003) 83-92
38. Magnusson M.S. Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 32 (2000) 93-110
39. Rousseau J.B., et al. Classification of rat behavior with an image-processing method and a neural network. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 32 (2000) 63-71
40. Laghaee A., et al. Artificial intelligence and robotics in high throughput post-genomics. Drug Discov. Today 10 (2005) 1253-1259