Analysing hippocampal function in transgenic mice: An ethological perspective

Trends in Neurosciences

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 47-51

  Gerlai, Robert ^a   Clayton, Nicola S ^b  

^a GENENTECH INC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; ETHOLOGY; HIPPOCAMPUS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; NEUROSCIENCE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

EID: 0033082436     PISSN: 01662236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01346-0     Document Type: Note

References (40)

1. 1 Scoville W.B., Milner B. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 20:1957;11-21.
2. 2 Gerlai R.et al. Learn. Mem. 2:1995;26-39.
3. 3 Grant S.G.N.et al. Science. 258:1992;1903-1910.
4. 4 Bach M.E.et al. Cell. 81:1995;905-915.
5. 5 Gerlai R. Trends Neurosci. 19:1996;188-189.
6. 6 Nadel L. Alleva E.et al. Behavioral Brain Research in Naturalistic and Semi-naturalistic Settings. 1995;323-342 Kluwer Academic Press.
7. 7 Garcia J., Koelling R.A. Psychonomic Sci. 4:1966;123-124.
8. 8 Gerlai R. Semin. Neurosci. 8:1996;153-161.
9. 9 van Abeelen J.H.F. Royce J.R., Mos L.P. Theoretical Advances in Behavior Genetics. 1979;101-119 Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
10. 10 Kamil A.C., Maudlin J.E. Bolles R.C., Beecher M.D. Evolution and Learning. 1988;117-134 Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. 11 Morris R.G.M. J. Neurosci. Methods. 11:1984;47-60.
12. 12 Nowak, R.M., Paradiso, J.L. (1983) Walker's Mammals of the World (Vol. 2, 4th edn), pp. 569-1362, Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. 13 Bonhomme F. Goldowiz D., Wahlsten D., Wimer R.E. Techniques for the Genetic Analysis of Brain and Behavior: Focus on the Mouse. 1992;41-56 Elsevier.
14. 14 Sage R.D. Foster H.L., Small J.D., Fox J.G. The Mouse in Biomedical Research. 1981;34-57 Academic Press.
15. 15 Whishaw I.Q.et al. J. Neurosci. 15:1995;5779-5788.
16. 16 Eichenbaum H.et al. J. Neurosci. 10:1990;3531-3542.
17. 17 Kavaliers M., Galea L.A.M. Behav. Brain Res. 61:1993;97-100.
18. 18 Galea L.A.M.et al. Brain Res. 635:1994;18-26.
19. 19 Timberlake W., Lucas G.A. Klein S.B., Mowrer R.R. Contemporary Learning Theories: Instrumental Conditioning Theory and the Impact of Biological Constraints on Learning. 1989;237-275 Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. 20 Lee D.W.et al. NeuroReport. 9:1998;15-27.
21. 21 Eichenbaum H.et al. Behav. Neurosci. 102:1988;331-339.
22. 22 Reid E.N., Morris R.G.M. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 247:1992;137-143.
23. 23 Reid E.N., Morris R.G.M. Trends Neurosci. 16:1993;17-20.
24. 24 Lavenex P., Schenk F. Learn. Mem. 2:1995;299-319.
25. 25 Vanderwall S.B. Anim. Behav. 41:1991;851-863.
26. 26 Chen K.S.et al. J. Neurosci. 17:1997;7288-7296.
27. 27 Gallagher M.et al. Behav. Neurosci. 107:1993;618-626.
28. 28 Suarez S.D., Gallup G.G. Learn. Motiv. 12:1981;342-363.
29. 29 Crusio W.E., van Abeelen J.H.F. Heredity. 56:1986;55-63.
30. 30 Sherry D.W., Hampson E. Trends Cognit. Sci. 1:1998;17-22.
31. 31 Galea L.A.M.et al. J. Exp. Biol. 199:1996;195-200.
32. 32 McEwan B.et al. Neurology. 48:1997;8-15.
33. 33 Sapolsky R.M. Science. 273:1996;749-750.
34. 34 Topál J., Csányi V. Anim. Learn. Behav. 22:1994;96-102.
35. 35 Silva A.J.et al. Science. 257:1992;206-211.
36. 36 Deutsch J.A. Science. 262:1993;760-761.
37. 37 Blanchard R.J.et al. Blanchard R.J.et al. Ethoexperimental Approaches to the Study of Behaviour. 1989;114-136 Kluwer Academic Press.
38. 38 Lavenex P.et al. J. Comp. Psychol. 112:1998;127-136.
39. 39 Shiftlett, M. and Jacobs, L.F. J. Comp. Psychol. (in press).
40. 40 Clayton N.S., Dickinson A. Nature. 395:1998;272-274.