Hox genes and axial specification in vertebrates

American Zoologist

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 687-697

  Burke, Ann Campbell ^a   Nowicki, Julie L ^a  

^a WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746120694     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/41.3.687     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Beddington, R. S. P., A. W. Puschel, and P. Rashbass. 1992. Use of chimeras to study gene function in mesodermal tissues during gastrulation and early organogenesis. CIBA Foundation Symposium 165:61-77.
2. Burke, A. C. 2000. Hox Genes and the Global Patterning of the Somitic Mesoderm. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 47:199-225.
3. Burke, A. C., C. E. Nelson, B. A. Morgan, and C. J. Tabin. 1995. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121:333346.
4. Charité, J. 1994. Ectopic expression of Hoxb-8 Causes duplication of the ZPA in the forelimb and homeotic Transformation of Axial Structures. Cell 78:589-601.
5. Coates, M. and M. Cohn. 1998. Fins, limbs, and tails: Outgrowths and axial patterning in vertebrate evolution. BioEssays 20:371-381.
6. Coates, M. I. and M. J. Cohn. 1999. Vertebrate axial and appendicular patterning: The early development of paired appendages. Amer. Zbol. 39:676685.
7. Cohn, M. J., K. Patel, R. Krumlauf, D. G. Wilkinson, J. D. W. Clarke, and C. Tickle. 1997. Hox 9 genes and vertebrate limb specification. Nature 387:97101.
8. Crawford, M. 1995. Transformations in null mutants of Hox genes: Do they represent intercalary regenerates? BioEssays 17:1065-1073.
9. Dietrich, S. 1999. Regulation of hypaxial muscle development. Cell and Tissue Research 296:175182. ;
10. Dietrich, S., F. R. Schubert, C. Healy, P. T. Sharpe, and A. Lumsden. 1998. Specification of the hypaxial musculature. Development 125:2235-2249.
11. Donoghue, M. J., J. P. Merlie, N. Rosenthal, and J. R. Sanes. 1991. A rostrocaudal gradient of transgene expression in adult skeletal muscle. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88:5847-5851.
12. Donoghue, M. J., R. Morris-Valero, Y. R. Johnson, J. P. Merlie, and J. R. Sanes. 1992. Mammalian muscle cells bear a cell-autonomous, heritable memory of their rostrocaudal position. Cell 69:67-77.
13. Duboule, D. 1994. Temporal colinearity and the phylotypic progression: A basis for the stability of a vertebrate Bauplan and the evolution of morphologies through heterochrony. Development Supplement: 135-142.
14. Duboule, D. and P. Dollé. 1989. The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J. 8:1497-1505.
15. Ensini, M., T. N. Tsuchida, H.-G. Belting, and T. M. Jessell. 1998. The control of rostrocaudal pattern in the developing spinal cord: Specification of motor neuron subtype identity is initiated by signals from paraxial mesoderm. Development 125:969982.
16. Gaunt, S. J. 1994. Conservation of the Hox code during morphological evolution. International J. Develop. Biol. 38:549-552.
17. Gaunt, S. J. 2000. Evolutionary shift of vertebrate structures and Hox expression up and down thevv . axial series of segments: A consideration of possible mechanisms. International J. Develop. Biol. 44:109-117.
18. Goodrich, E. S. 1906. Notes on the development, structure, and origin of the median and paired fins of fish. Quart. Jour. Micro. Sci. 50:333-376.
19. Goodrich, E. S. 1913. Metameric segmentation and homology. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci. 59:227.
20. Graham, A., N. Papalopulu, and R. Krumlauf. 1989. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57:367-378.
21. Grieshammer, U., D. Sassoon, and N. Rosenthal. 1992. A transgene target for positional regulators marks early rostrocaudal specification of myogenic lineages. Cell 69:79-93.
22. Hatada, Y. and C-4D. Stern. 1994. A fate map of the epiblast of the early chick embryo. Development 120:2879-2889.
23. Itasaki, N., J. Sharpe, A. Morrison, and R. Krumlauf. 1996. Reprogramming Hox expression in the vertebrate hindbrain: Influence of paraxial mesoderm and rhombomere transposition. Neuron 16:487500.
24. Kant, R. and R. S. Goldstein. 1999. Plasticity of axial identity among somites: Cranial somites can generate vertebrae without expressing Hox genes appropriate to the trunk. Develop. Biol. 216:507520.
25. Kessel, M. and P. Gruss. 1991. Homeotic transformations of murine vertebrae and concomitant alteration of Hox codes induced by retinoic acid. Cell 76:89-104.
26. Kieny, M., A. Mauger, and P. Sengel. 1972. Early regionalization of the somitic mesoderm as studied by the development of the axial skeleton of the chick embryo. Develop. Biol. 28:142-161.
27. Krumlauf, R. 1994. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78:191-201.
28. Le Douarin, N. M. 1969. Particularities du noyaux interphasique chez la caille japonaise (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Utilisation de ces particularities comme 'marquage biologique' dans les recherches sur les interactions tissulaires et les migrations cellulaires au cours de l'ontogenèse. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 103:435-452.
29. Lewis, E. B. 1978. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276:565-570.
30. McGinnis, W. and R. Krumlauf. 1992. Homeobox gènes and axial patterning. Cell 68:283-302.
31. Murakami, G. and H. Nakamura. 1991. Somites and the pattern formation of trunk muscles: A study in quail-chick chimera. Arch. Histol. Cytol. 54: 249-258.
32. Nowicki, J. L. and A. C. Burke. 2000. Hox gènes and morphological identity: Axial versus lateral patterning in the vertebrate mesoderm. Development 127:4265.
33. Oberg, K. C. and G. Eichele. 1999. Hox gene expression and regulation in the presumptive wing region of the chick lateral plate mesoderm. Dev. Biology 210:151-180.
34. Ordahl, C. P. and N. M. Le Douarin. 1992. Two Myogenic lineages within the developing somite. Development 114:339-353.
35. Ordahl, C. P. and B. A. Williams. 1998. Knowing chops from chuck: Roasting MyoD redundancy. Bioessays 20:357-362.
36. Psychoyos, D. and C. D. Stern. 1996. Restoration of the organizer after radical ablation of Hensen's node and the anterior primitive streak in the chick embryo. Development 122:3263-3273.
37. Rancourt, D. 1995. Genetic interaction between Hoxb5 and Hoxb-6 is revealed by nonallelic noncomplementation. Genes and Development 9:1 OS122.
38. Roberts, D., R. Johnson, A. Burke, C. Nelson, B. Morgan, and C. Tabin. 1995. Sonic hedgehog is an endodermal signal inducing Bmp-4 and Hox genes during induction and regionalization of the chick hindgut. Development 121:3163-3174.
39. Roberts, D. J. 2000. Molecular Mechanisms of Development of the gastrointestinal tract. Developmental Dynamics. (In press)
40. Romer, A. S. and T. S. Parsons. 1977. The vertebrate body. W.B. Saunders, Co., Philadelphia.
41. Rong, P., M. Teilet, C. Ziller, and N. Le Douafin. 1992. The neural tube/notochord complex is necessary for vertebral but not limb and body wall striated muscle differentiation. Development 115:657672.
42. Schoenwolf, G. C., V. Garcia-Martinez, and M. Dias. 1992. Mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Developmental Dynamics 193:235-248.
43. Thery, C., M. J. Sharpe, S. J. Batley, C. D. Stern, and E. Gherardi. 1995. Expression of HGF/SF, HGF1/ MSP, and c-inet suggests new functions during early chick development. Developmental Genetics 17:90-101.
44. Yokouchi, Y, S. Nakazato, M. Yamamoto, Y. Goto, T. Kameda, H. Iba, and A. Kuroiwa. 1995. Misexpression of Ho.va-13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in s chick limb buds. Genes & Development 9:25092522.