Genetic interaction between hoxb-5 and hoxb-6 is revealed by nonallelic noncomplementation

Genes and Development

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 108-122

  Rancourt, Derrick E ^a   Tsuzuki, Teruhisa ^a,b   Capecchi, Mario R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

cervicothoracic vertebrae; forelimbs; Gene targeting; homeotic transformations; Hox genes; nonallelic noncomplementation

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; GENE DISRUPTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION; HISTOLOGY; HOMEOBOX; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOUSE; MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0028859990     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.9.1.108     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Akam, M.E. 1987. The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 101: 1-22.
2. Balling, R., C. Ebensperger, I. Hoffmann, K. Imai, H. Koseki, Y. Mizutani, and I. Wallin. 1993. The genetics of skeletal development. Ann. Genet. 36: 56-62.
3. Bland, J.H. and D.R. Boushey. 1990. Anatomy and physiology of the cervical spine. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 20: 1-20.
4. Braun, T., M.A. Rudnicki, H.-H. Arnold, and R. Jaenisch. 1992. Targeted inactivation of the muscle regulatory gene Myf-5 results in abnormal rib development and perinatal death. Cell 71: 369-382.
5. Capecchi, M.R. 1989. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science 244: 1288-1292.
6. _. 1994. Targeted gene replacement. Sci. Am. 270: 54-61.
7. Carpenter, E.M., J.M. Goddard, O. Chisaka, N.R. Manley, and M.R. Capecchi. 1993. Loss of Hox-A1 (Hox-1.6) function results in the reorganization of the murine hindbrain. Development 118: 1063-1075.
8. Chen, J.M. 1952. Studies on the morphogenesis of the mouse sternum II. Experiments on the origin of the sternum and its capacity for self-differentiation in vitro. J. Anat. 86: 387-401.
9. _. 1953. Studies on the morphogenesis of the mouse sternum. III. Experiments on the closure and segmentation of the sternal bands. J. Anat. 87: 130-149.
10. Chevalier, A., M. Kieny, A. Mauger, and P. Sengel. 1977. Developmental fate of the somitic mesoderm in the chick embryo. In Vertebrate limb and somite morphogenesis (ed. D.A. Ede, J.R. Hinchliffe, and M. Balls], pp. 421-432. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Chisaka, O. and M.R. Capecchi. 1991. Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.5. Nature 350: 473-479.
12. Chisaka, O., T.S. Musci, and M.R. Capecchi. 1992. Developmental defects of the ear, cranial nerves and hindbrain resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene Hox-1.6. Nature 355: 516-520.
13. Christ, B. and J. Whiting. 1992. From somites to vertebral column. Ann. Anat. 174: 23-32.
14. Condie, B.G. and M.R. Capecchi. 1993. Mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of Hoxd-3 (Hox-4.1) exhibit anterior transformations of the first and second cervical vertebrae, the atlas and the axis. Development 119: 579-595.
15. _. 1994. Mice with targeted disruptions in the paralogous genes hoxu-3 and hoxd-3 reveal synergistic interactions. Nature 370: 304-307.
16. Davis, A.P. and M.R. Capecchi. 1994. Axial homeosis and apPendicular skeleton defects in mice with a targeted disruption of hoxd-11. Development 120: 2187-2198.
17. Deng, C., K.R. Thomas, and M.R. Capecchi. 1993. Location of crossovers during gene targeting with insertion and replacement vectors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 2134-2140.
18. Dodd, J., S.B. Morton, D. Karagogeos, M. Yamamoto, and T.M. Jessell. 1988. Spatial regulation of axonal glycoprotein expression on subsets of embryonic spinal neurons. Neuron 1: 105-116.
19. Dollé, P., A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, T. Schimmang, B. Schuhbaur, P. Chambon, and D. Duboule. 1993. Disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene induces localized heterochrony leading to mice with neotenic limbs. Cell 75: 431-441.
20. Duboule, D. and P. Dollé. 1989. The structural and functional organization of the murine Hox gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J 8: 1497-1505.
21. Eid, R., H. Koseki, and K. Schughart. 1993. Analysis of lacZ reporter genes in transgenic embryos suggests the presence of several cis-acting regulatory elements in the murine hoxb-6 gene. Dev. Dyn. 196: 205-216.
22. Garcia-Fernández, J. and P.W.H. Holland. 1994. Archetypal organization of the amphioxus Hox gene cluster. Nature 370: 563-566.
23. Gaunt, S.J., P.L. Coletta, D. Pravtcheva, and P.T. Sharpe. 1990. Mouse Hox-3.4: Homeobox sequence and embryonic expression patterns compared with other members of the Hox gene network. Development 109: 329-339.
24. Gendron-Maguire, M., M. Mallo, M. Zhang, and T. Gridley. 1993. Hoxa-2 mutant mice exhibit homeotic transformation of skeletal elements derived from cranial neural crest. Cell 75: 1317-1331.
25. Götz, W., G. Fischer, and R. Herken. 1991. Lectin binding pattern in the embryonal and early fetal human vertebral column. Anat. Embryol 184: 345-353.
26. Graham, A., N. Papalopulu, and R. Krumlauf. 1989. The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57: 367-378.
27. Hays, T.S., R. Duering, B. Robertson, M. Prout, and M.T. Fuller. 1989. Interacting proteins identified by genetic interactions: A missense mutation in α-tubulin fails to complement alleles of the testis-specific β-tubulin gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9: 875-884.
28. Heitman, J., N.R. Movva, and M.N. Hall. 1991. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science 253: 905-909.
29. Holland, P.W.H. and B.L.M. Hogan. 1988. Spatially restricted pattern of expression of the homeobox-containing gene, Hox-2.1 during mouse embryogenesis. Development 102: 159-174.
30. Holland, P.W.H., L.Z. Holland, N.A. Williams, and N.D. Holland. 1992. An amphioxus homeobox gene: Sequence conservation, spatial expression during development and insights into vertebrate evolution. Development 116: 653-661.
31. Hunt, P., M. Gulisano, M. Cook, M.-H. Sham, A. Faiella, D. Wilkinson, E. Boncinelli, and R. Krumlauf. 1991. A distinct Hox code for the branchial region of the vertebrate head. Nature 353: 861-864.
32. Jeannotte, L., M. Lemieux, J. Charron, F. Poirier, and E.J. Robertson. 1993. Specification of axial identity in the mouse: Role of the Hoxa-5 (Hox-1.3) gene. Genes &. Dev. 7: 2085-2096.
33. Kappen, C., K. Schughart, and F.H. Ruddle. 1989. Two steps in the evolution of Antennapedia-class vertebrate homeobox genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86: 5459-5463.
34. Kissinger, C.R., B. Liu, E. Martin-Blanco, T.B. Kornberg, and C.O. Pabo. 1990. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 Å resolution: A framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell 63: 579-590.
35. Kostic, D. and M.R. Capecchi. 1994. Targeted disruptions of the murine hoxa-4 and hoxa-6 genes result in homeotic transformations of components of the vertebral column. Mech. Dev. 46: 231-247.
36. Krumlauf, R., P.W. Holland, J.H. McVey, and B.L.M. Hogan. 1987. Developmental and spatial patterns of expression in the mouse homeobox gene Hox 2.1. Development 99: 603-617.
37. Kuratani, S.C. and N.A. Wall. 1992. Expression of Hox 2.1 protein in restricted populations of neural crest cells and pharyngeal ectoderm. Dev. Dyn. 195: 15-28.
38. LeMouellic, H., Y. Lallemand, and P. Brulet. 1992. Homeosis in the mouse induced by a null mutation in the Hox-3.1 gene. Cell 69: 251-264.
39. Lewis, E.B. 1978. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276: 565-570.
40. Lufkin, T., A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, M. Mark, and P. Chambon. 1991. Disruption of the Hox-1.6 homeobox gene results in defects in a region corresponding to its rostral domain of expression. Cell 66: 1105-1119.
41. Mansour, S.L., K.R. Thomas, and M.R. Capecchi. 1988. Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: A general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes. Nature 336: 348-352.
42. Mansour, S.L., J.M. Goddard, and M.R. Capecchi. 1993. Mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 have developmental defects in the tail and inner ear. Development 117: 13-28.
43. Mark, M., T. Lufkin, J.L. Vonesch, E. Ruberte, J.-C. Olivo, P. Dollé, P. Gorry, A. Lumsden, and P. Chambon. 1993. Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice. Development 119: 319-338.
44. McKusick, V.A. 1992. Mendelian inheritance in man: Catalogs of autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked phenotypes. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
45. Otting, G., Y.Q. Qian, M. Billeter, M. Muller, M. Affolter, W.J. Gehring, and K. Wuthrich. 1990. Protein-DNA contacts in the structure of a homeodomain-DNA complex determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in solution. EMBO J. 9: 3085-3092.
46. Ramirez-Solis, R., H. Zheng, J. Whiting, R. Krumlauf, and A. Bradley. 1993. Hoxb-4 (Hox-2.6) mutant mice show homeotic transformation of a cervical vertebra and defects in the closure of the sternal rudiments. Cell 73: 279-294.
47. Rijli, F.M., M. Mark, S. Lakkaraju, A. Dierich, P. Dollé, and P. Chambon. 1993. A homeotic transformation is generated in the rostral branchial region of the head by disruption of Hoxa-2, which acts as a selector gene. Cell 75: 1333-1349.
48. Rine, J. and I. Herskowitz. 1987. Four genes responsible for a position affect on expression from HML and HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 116: 9-22.
49. Schughart, K., M.F. Utset, A. Awgulewitsch, and F.H. Ruddle. 1988. Structure and expression of Hox-2.2, a murine homeobox-containing gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 5582-5586.
50. Schughart, K., C.J. Bieberich, R. Eid, and F.H. Ruddle. 1991. A regulatory region from the mouse Hox-2.2 promoter directs gene expression into developing limbs. Development 112: 807-811.
51. Scott, M.P. 1992. Vertebrate homeobox gene nomenclature. Cell 71: 551-553.
52. Shen, W., K. Detmer, T.A. Simonitch-Eason, H.J. Lawrence, and C. Largman. 1991. Alternative splicing of the HOX 2.2 homeobox gene in human hematopoietic cells and murine embryonic and adult tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 539-545.
53. Small, K.M. and S.S. Potter. 1993. Homeotic transformations and limb defects in Hoxa-11 mutant mice. Genes &. Dev. 7: 2318-2328.
54. Stearns, T. and D. Botstein. 1988. Unlinked noncomplementation: Isolation of new conditional-lethal mutations in each of the tubulin genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 119: 249-260.
55. Thomas, K.R. and M.R. Capecchi. 1987. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51: 503-512.
56. _. 1990. Targeted disruption of the murine int-1 protooncogene resulting in severe abnormalities in midbrain and cerebellar development. Nature 346: 847-850.
57. Varkey, J.P., P.L. Jansma, A.N. Minniti, and S. Ward. 1993. The Caenorhabditis elegans spe-6 gene is required for major sperm protein assembly and shows second site non-complementation with an unlinked deficiency. Genetics 133; 79-86.
58. Verbout, A.J. 1985. The development of the vertebral column. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 90: 1-122.
59. Wall, N.A., C.M. Jones, B.L.M. Hogan, and C.V.E. Wright 1992. Expression and modification of hox-2.1 protein in mouse embryos. Mech. Dev. 37: 111-120.
60. Wilson, M.G., V.G. Miksity, and N.W. Shinno. 1971. Dominant inheritance of Sprengel's deformity. J. Pediatr. 79: 818-821.
61. Zappavigna, V., D. Sartori, and F. Mavilio. 1994. Specificity of HOX protein function depends on DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions, both mediated by the homeo domain. Genes & Dev. 8: 732-744.