Restoration of the organizer after radical ablation of Hensen's node and the anterior primitive streak in the chick embryo

Development

Volumn 122, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 3263-3273

  Psychoyos, Delphine ^a   Stern, Claudio D ^a  

^a New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell fate; Cell migration; Chick embryo; Gastrulation; Hensen's node; Neural induction; Notochord; Primitive streak; Regeneration

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MOTION; CELL REGENERATION; CHICK EMBRYO; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENDODERM; GASTRULATION; GENE EXPRESSION; MESODERM; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NERVOUS TISSUE; NONHUMAN; NOTOCHORD; PRIMITIVE STREAK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMITE;

ANIMALS; CHICK EMBRYO; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; GOOSECOID PROTEIN; HEDGEHOG PROTEINS; HEPATOCYTE NUCLEAR FACTOR 3-BETA; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NOTOCHORD; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEINS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; TIME FACTORS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALIA; ERINACEIDAE;

EID: 0029851957     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ang, S. L. and Rossant, J. (1994). HNF-3β is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development. Cell 78, 561-574.
2. Abercrombie, M. (1950). The effects of antero-posterior reversal of lengths of the primitive streak in the chick. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 234, 317-338
3. Abercrombie, M. and Waddington, C. H. (1937). The behaviour of grafts of primitive streak beneath the primitive streak of the chick. J. Exp. Biol. 14, 319-334.
4. Abercrombie, M. and Bellairs, R. (1954). The effects in chick blastoderms of replacing the node by a graft of posterior primitive streak. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 2, 55-72.
5. Brummett, A. R. (1968). Deletion-transplantation experiments on embryos of Fundulus heteroclitus. I. The posterior embryonic shield. J. Exp. Zool. 169, 315-334.
6. Brummett, A. R. (1969). Deletion-transplantation experiments on embryos of Fundulus heteroclitus. II. The anterior embryonic shield. J. Exp. Zool. 172, 443-464.
7. Butros, J. (1967). Limited axial structures in nodeless chick blastoderms. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 17, 119-130.
8. Chavrier, P., Zerial, M., Lemaire, P., Almendral, J., Bravo, R. and Charnay, P. (1988). A gene encoding a protein with zinc fingers is activated during G0/G1 transition in cultured cells. EMBO J. 7, 29-35.
9. Cho, K. W., Blumberg, B., Steinbeisser, H. and De Robertis, E. M. (1991). Molecular nature of Spemann's organizer: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene goosecoid. Cell 67, 1111-1120.
10. Collignon, J., Sockanathan, S., Hacker, A., Cohen-Tannoudji, M., Norris, D., Rastan, S., Stevanovic, M., Goodfellow, P. N. and Lovell-Badge, R. (1996). A comparison of the properties of Sox-3 with Sry and two related genes, Sox-1 and Sox-2. Development 122, 506-520.
11. Cooke, J. (1972a). Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. I. Autonomy of cell behaviour at the site of initial organizer formation. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 28, 13-26.
12. Cooke, J. (1972b). Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. III. Retention of polarity in cell groups excised from the region of the early organizer. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 28, 47-56.
13. Cooke, J. (1973). Properties of the primary organization field in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. V. Regulation after removal of the head organizer, in normal early gastrulae and in those already possessing a second implanted organizer. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 30, 283-300.
14. Cooke, J. (1975). Local autonomy of gastrulation movements after dorsal lip removal in two anuran amphibians. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 33, 147-157.
15. Dias, M. S. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1990). Formation of ectopic neuroepithelium in chick blastoderms: age-related capacities for induction and self-differentiation following transplantation of quail Hensen's node. Anat. Rec. 228, 437-448.
16. e reunion, Madrid 1964. In: Bull. Ass. Anat. 125, 632-639.
17. Gallera, J. (1971). Primary induction in birds. Adv. Morph. 9, 149-180.
18. Gallera, J. and Dicenta, C. (1966). Renversement de l'axe dorso-ventral du noeud de Hensen dans la ligne primitive de l'embryon de poulet. Rev. Suisse Zool. 73, 43-54.
19. Gallera, J. and Nicolet, G. (1974). Regulation in nodeless chick blasoderms. Experientia 30, 183-185.
20. García-Martínez, V., Ivarez, I. S. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1993). Locations of the ectodermal and nonectodermal subdivisions of the epiblast at stages 3 and 4 of avian gastrulation and neurulation. J. Exp. Zool. 267, 431-446.
21. Gerhart, J. C. (1980). Mechanisms regulating pattern formation in the amphibian egg and early embryo. In Biological Regulation and Development. Vol. 2: Molecular Organization and Cell Function (ed. R. F. Goldberger). pp. 133-316. New York: Plenum Press.
22. Grabowski, C. T. (1953). The effects of the excision of Hensen's node from the early chick blastoderm. Anat. Rec. 117, 559.
23. Grabowski, C. T. (1956). The effects of the excision of Hensen's node on the early development of the chick embryo. J. Exp. Zool. 133, 301-344.
24. Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick. J. Morph. 88, 49-92.
25. Hornbruch, A. and Wolpert, L. (1986). Positional signalling by Hensen s node when grafted to the chick limb bud. J. Embryol Exp. Morph. 94, 257-265.
26. Hara, K. (1978). Spemann's organiser in birds. In Organizer - a milestone of a half-Century since Spemann. (ed. O. Nakamura and S. Toivonen). pp. 221-265. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland.
27. Izpisúa-Belmonte, J. C., De Robertis, E. M., Storey, K. G. and Stern, C. D. (1993). The homeobox gene goosecoid and the origin of the organizer cells in the early chick blastoderm. Cell 74, 645-659.
28. Kintner, C. R., and Dodd, J. (1991). Hensen s node induces neural tissue in Xenopus ectoderm. Implications for the action of the organizer in neural induction. Development 113, 1495-1505.
29. Knezevic, V., Ransom, M. and Mackem, S. (1995). The organizer-associated chick homeobox gene Gnot1 is expressed before gastrulation and regulated synergistically by activin and retinoic acid. Dev. Biol. 171, 458-470.
30. Leikola, A. (1976). Hensen's node - the organizer of the amniote embryo. Experientia 32, 269-277.
31. Levin, M., Johnson, R. L., Stern, C. D., Kuehn, M. and Tabin, C. J. (1995). A molecular pathway determining left-right asymmetry in chick embryogenesis. Cell 82, 803-814.
32. Lewis, W. H. (1912). Experiments on localization and regeneration in the embryonic shield and germ ring of the teleost fish (Fundulus heteroclitus). Anat. Rec. 6, 325-333.
33. Moos, M. Jr., Wang, S. and Krinks, M. (1995). Anti-dorsalizing morphogenetic protein is a novel TGF-β homolog expressed in the Spemann organizer. Development 121, 4293-4301.
34. New, D. A. T. (1955). A new technique for the cultivation of the chick embryo in vitro. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 3, 326-331.
35. Nicholas, J. S. and Oppenheimer, J. M. (1942). Regulation and reconstitution in Fundulus. J. Exp. Zool. 90, 127-153.
36. Nicolet, G. (1970). Analyse autoradiographique de la localisation des différentes ébauches présomptives dans la ligne primitive de l'embryon de poulet. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 23, 79-108.
37. Nicolet, G. (1971). Avian gastrulation. Adv. Morphagen. 9, 231-262.
38. Pannett, C. A. and Compton, A. (1924). The cultivation of tissues in orange juice. Lancet 206, 381-384.
39. Psychoyos, D. and Stern, C. D. (1996). Fates and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development 122, 1523-1534.
40. Riddle, R. D., Johnson, R. L., Laufer, E. and Tabin, C. (1993) Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75, 1401-1416.
41. Rivera-Pérez, J. A., Mallo, M., Gendron-Maguire, M., Gridley, T. and Behringer, R. R. (1995). Goosecoid is not an essential component of the mouse gastrula organizer but is required for craniofacial and rib development. Development 121, 3005-3012.
42. Roelink, H., Augsburger, A., Heemskerk, J., Korzh, V., Norlin, S., Ruiz i Altaba, A., Tanabe, Y., Placzek, M., Edlund, T., Jessell, T. M. and Dodd, J. (1994). Floor plate and motor neuron induction by vhh-1. a vertebrate homolog of hedgehog expressed by the notochord. Cell 76, 761-775.
43. Rosenquist, G. C. (1966). A radioautographic study of labeled grafts in the chick blastoderm. Contr. Embryol. Carnegie Inst. Wash. 38, 71-110.
44. Rosenquist, G. C. (1983). The chorda center in Hensen's node of the chick embryo. Anat. Rec. 207, 349-355.
45. Ruiz i Altaba, A., Placzek, M., Baldassari, M., Dodd, J. and Jessell, T. M. (1995). Early stages of notochord and floor plate development in the chick embryo defined by normal and induced expression of HNF-3β. Devl. Biol. 170, 299-313.
46. Ruiz i Altaba, A., Warga, R. M. and Stern, C. D. (1993). Fate maps and cell lineage analysis. In Essential Developmental Biology: A Practical Approach. (ed. C. D. Stern and P. W. H. Holland), pp. 81-95. Oxford: IRL Press at Oxford University Press.
47. Schoenwolf, G. C. (1992). Morphological and mapping studies of the paranodal and postnodal levels of the neural plate during chick neurulation. Anat. Rec. 233, 281-290.
48. Schoenwolf, G. C. and Yuan, S. (1995). Experimental analyses of the rearrangement of ectodermal cells during gastrulation and neurulation in avian embryos. Cell Tiss. Res. 280, 243-251.
49. Selleck, M. A. J. and Stern, C. D. (1991). Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of Hensen's node in the chick embryo. Development 112, 615-626.
50. Selleck, M. A. J. and Stern, C. D. (1992). Commitment of mesoderm cells in Hensen's node of the chick embryo to notochord and somite. Development 114, 403-415.
51. Shih, J. and Fraser, S. E. (1996). Characterizing the zebrafish organizer: microsurgical analysis at the early-shield stage. Development 122, 1313-1322.
52. Spratt, N. T. (1955). Analysis of the organizer center in the chick embryo. I Localization of notochord and somite cells. J. Exp. Zool. 128, 121-163.
53. Stein, S. and Kessel, M. (1995). A homeobox gene involved in node, notochord and neural plate formation of chick embryos. Mechan. Dev. 49, 37-48.
54. Stern, C. D. (1993). Avian embryos. In: Essential Developmental Biology: A Practical Approach. (eds. C. D. Stern and P. W. H. Holland), pp. 45-54. Oxford: 1RL Press/Oxford University Press.
55. Stern, C. D. (1994). The avian embryo: a powerful model system for studying neural induction. FASEB J. 8, 687-691.
56. Stern, C. D. and Ireland, G. W. (1981). An integrated experimental study of endoderm formation in avian embryos. Anat. Embryol. 163, 245-263.
57. Stern, C. D., Yu, R. T., Kakizuka, A., Kintner, C. R., Mathews, L. S., Vale, W. W., Evans, R. M. and Umesono, K. (1995). Activin and its receptors during gastrulation and the later phases of mesoderm development in the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 172, 192-205.
58. Storey, K. G., Crossley, J. M., De Robertis, E. M., Norris, W. E. and Stern, C. D. (1992). Neural induction and regionalisation in the chick embryo. Development 114, 729-741.
59. Streit, A., Théry, C. and Stern, C. D. (1994). Of mice and frogs. Trends Genet. 10, 181-183.
60. Streit, A., Stern, C. D., Théry, C., Ireland, G. W., Aparicio, S., Sharpe, M. and Gherardi, E. (1995). A role for HGF/SF in neural induction and its expression in Hensen's node during gastrulation. Development 121, 813-824.
61. Uwanogho, D., Rex, M., Cartwright, E. J., Pearl, G., Healy, C., Scotting, P. J. and Sharpe, P. T. (1995). Embryonic expression of the chicken Sox2, Sox3 and Sox11 genes suggests an interactive role in neuronal development. Mech. Dev. 49, 23-26.
62. Waddington, C. H. (1932). Experiments on the development of chick and duck embryos, cultivated in vitro. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 221, 179-230.
63. Waddington, C. H. (1933). Induction by the primitive streak and its derivatives in the chick. J. Exp. Biol. 10, 38-46.
64. Weinstein, D. C., Ruiz i Altaba, A., Chen, W. S., Hoodless, P., Prezioso, V. R., Jessell, T. M. and Darnell, J. E. Jr. (1994). The winged-helix transcription factor HNF-3 is required for notochord development in the mouse embryo. Cell 78, 575-588.
65. Wilkinson, D. G., Bhatt, S., Chavrier, P., Bravo, R. and Charnay, P. (1989). Segment-specific expression of a zinc-finger gene in the developing nervous system of the mouse. Nature 337, 461-464.
66. Yamada, G., Mansouri, A., Torres, M., Stuart, E. T., Blum, M., Schultz, M., De Robertis, E. M. and Gruss, P. (1995). Targeted mutation of the murine goosecoid gene results in craniofacial defects and neonatal death. Development 121, 2917-2922.
67. Yamada, T., Placzek, M., Tanaka, H., Dodd, J. and Jessell, T. M. (1991). Control of cell pattern in the developing nervous-system: polarizing activity of the floor plate and notochord. Cell 64, 635-647.
68. Yu, R. T., McKeown, M., Evans, R. M. and Umesono, K. (1994). Relationship between Drosophila gap gene tailless and a vertebrate nuclear receptor Tlx. Nature 370, 375-379.
69. Yuan, S. G., Darnell, D. K. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1995a). Mesodermal patterning during avian gastrulation and neurulation: experimental induction of notochord from non-notochordal precursor cells. Dev. Genetics 17, 38-54.
70. Yuan, S. G., Darnell, D. K. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1995b). Identification of inducing, responding and suppressing regions in an experimental model of notochord formation in avian embryos. Dev. Biol. 172, 567-584.