Morphogenesis and homology in arthropod limbs

American Zoologist

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 664-675

  Williams, Terri A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745977463     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/39.3.664     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alberch, P. and E. Gale. 1985. A developmental analysis of an evolutionary trend: Digital reduction in amphibians. Evolution 39:8-23.
2. Averof, M. and S. Cohen. 1997. Evolutionary origin of insect wings from ancestral gills. Nature 385: 627-630.
3. Bateson, W. 1892. On numerical variation in teeth, with a discussion of the conception of homology. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1892:102-115.
4. Bolker, J. A. and R. A. Raff. 1996. Developmental genetics and traditional homology. Bioessays 18: 489-494.
5. Budd, G. E. 1996. The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stemgroup. Lethaia 29:1-14.
6. Caiman, W. T. 1909. Crustacea. Adam and Charles Black, London.
7. Campbell, G. and A. Tomlinson. 1995. Initiation of proximodistal axis in insect legs. Development 121:619-628.
8. Cohen, S. M. and G. Jürgens. 1989. Proximal-distal pattern formation in Drosophila: Graded requirement for Distal-less gene activity during limb development. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 198:157-169.
9. Dahl, E. 1987. Malacostraca mistreated-the case of the Phllyocarida. J. Crust. Biol. 7:721-725.
10. Dickinson, W. J. 1995. Molecules and morphology: Where's the homology? Trends in Genetics 11: 119-121.
11. Dohle, W. and G. Scholtz. 1988. Clonal analysis of the crustacean segment: The discordance between genealogical and segmental borders. Development (Suppl.) 104:147-160.
12. Fortey, R. A. and R. H. Thomas, (eds.) 1997. Arthropod relationships. Chapman and Hall, London.
13. Fryer, G. 1987. A new classification of the branchiopod Crustacea. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 91:357-383.
14. Fryer, G. 1988. Studies on the functional morphology and biology of the Notostraca (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 321: 27-124.
15. Gonzalez-Crespo, S. and G. Morata. 1996. Genetic evidence for the subdivision of the arthropod limb into coxopodite and telopodite. Development 122: 3921-3928. .!
16. Goodwin, B. C. and L. E. H. Trainor. 1983. ?The ontogeny and phylogeny of the pentadactyl limb. In B. C. Goodwin, N. Holder, and C. C. Wylie (eds.), Development and evolution, pp. 75-98. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. Hall, B. K. (ed.) 1994. Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative morphology. Academic Press, New York.
18. Hansen, H. J. 1925. On the comparative morphology of the appendages in the Arthropoda A. Crustacea. Glydendalske, Copenhagen.
19. Hessler, R. H. 1982. Evolution within the Crustacea. In L. Abele (ed.), Biology of the Crustacea, Vol. 1, Systemalics, the fossil record and biogeography, pp. 149-185. Academic press, New York.
20. Hessler, R. H. and W. A. Newman. 1985 A trilobitomorph origin for the Crustacea. Fossils and Strata 4:437-459.
21. Jockusch, E. L. and L. M. Nagy. 1997. Insect evolution: How did insect wings originate? Current Biology 7:R358-R361.
22. Lowe, C. J. and G. A. Wray. 1997. Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution. Nature 389:718-721.
23. Manton, S. M. 1934. On the embryology of the crustacean Nebalia bipes. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 6223:163-238.
24. Manton, S. M. 1977. The Arthropoda. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
25. Martin, J. W. and J. C. Christiansen. 1995. A morphological comparison of the phyllopodous thoracic limbs of a leptostracan (Nebalia sp.) and a spinicaudate conchostracan (Leplcstheria sp.), with comments on the use of Phyllopoda as a taxonomic category. Can. J. Zool. 73:2283-2291.
26. McLaughlin, P. A. 1982. Comparative morphology of crustacean appendages. In L. G. Abele (ed.), Biology of the Crustacea. Vol. 2, Embryology, mor-phology, and genetics, pp. 197-256. Academic Press, New York.
27. Oster, G. E, N. Shubin, J. D. Murray, and P. Alberch. 1988. Evolution and morphogenetic rules: The shape of the vertebrate limb in ontogeny and phylogeny. Evolution 42:862-884.
28. Panganiban, G., A. Sebring, L. Nagy, and S. Carroll. 1995. The development of crustacean limbs and the evolution of arthropods. Science 270:13631366.
29. Regier, J. C. and J. W. Shultz. 1997. Molecular phylogeny of the major arthropod groups indicates polyphyly of the crustaceans and a new hypothesis for the origin of hexapods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14:902-913.
30. Roth, V. L. 1984. On homology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22:13-29.
31. Schräm, E R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
32. Shubin, N., C. Tabin, and S. Carroll. 1997. Fossils, genes, and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388:639-648.
33. Shubin, N. H. and P. Alberch. 1986. A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb. Evol. Biol. 20:319-387.
34. Struhl, G. and K. Basler. 1993. Organizing activity of wingless protein in Drosophila. Cell 72:527-540.
35. Van Valen, L. 1982. Homology and causes. J. Morph. 173:305-312.
36. Wagner, G. P. 1989. The biological homology concept. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:51-69.
37. Walossek, D. and K. J. Muller. 1997. Cambrian 'Orsten'-type arthropods and the phylogeny of Crustacea. In R. A. Fortey and R. H. Thomas (eds.), Arthropod relationships, pp. 139-153. Chapman and Hall, London.
38. Williams, T. A. 1998. Distalless expression in crustaceans and the patterning of branched limbs. Development Genes and Evolution 207:427-434.
39. Williams, T. A. and G. B. Muller. 1996. Limb development in a primitive crustacean, Triops longicaitdatus: Subdivision of the early limb bud gives rise to multibranched limbs. Development, Genes, and Evolution 206:161-168.
40. Williams, T. A. and L. M. Nagy. 1996. Comparative limb development in insects and crustaceans. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 7: 615-628.