Mathematical framework for Bz-based MREIT model in electrical impedance imaging

Computers and Mathematics with Applications

Volumn 51, Issue 5 SPEC. ISS., 2006, Pages 817-828

  Kwon, Ohin ^a   Pyo, Hyunchan ^b   Seo, Jin Keun ^c   Woo, Eung Je ^b  

^a Konkuk University   (South Korea)

^b Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conductivity reconstruction; Inverse problem; Maxwell equations; MREIT; Uniqueness

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAXWELL EQUATIONS; MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; SCANNING;

CONDUCTIVITY RECONSTRUCTION; ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; MREIT MODELS; UNIQUENESS;

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 33745966129     PISSN: 08981221     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2006.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Zhang N. Electrical impedance tomography based on current density imaging. MS Thesis (1992), Dept. of Elec. Eng., Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
2. Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., and Mun C.W. Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance. SPIE 2299 (1994) 377-385
3. Ider Y.Z., and Birgul O. Use of the magnetic field generated by the internal distribution of injected currents for electrical impedance tomography (MR-EIT). Elektrik 6 3 (1998) 215-225
4. In: Webster J.G. (Ed). Electrical Impedance Tomography (1990), Adam Hilger, Bristol, U.K.
5. Boone K., Barber D., and Brown B. Imaging with electricity: Report of the European concerted action on impedance tomography. J. Med. Eng. Tech. 21 6 (1997) 201-232
6. Saulnier G.J., Blue R.S., Newell J.C., Isaacson D., and Edic P.M. Electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag. 18 (2001) 31-43
7. Scott G.C., Joy M.L.G., Armstrong R.L., and Henkelman R.M. Measurement of nonuniform current density by magnetic resonance. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 10 3 (1991) 362-374
8. Scott G.C., Joy M.L.G., Armstrong R.L., and Henkelman R.M. Sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current density imaging. J. Mag. Res. 97 (1992) 235-254
9. Kwon O., Woo E., Yoon J.R., and Seo J.K. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): Simulation study of J-substitution algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 49 2 (2002) 160-167
10. Khang H.S., Lee B.I., Oh S.H., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., Cho M.H., Kwon O.I., Yoon J.R., and Seo J.K. J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): Phantom experiments for static resistivity images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 21 6 (2002) 695-702
11. Lee B.I., Oh S.H., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., Cho M.H., Kwon O., Seo J.K., and Baek W.S. Static resistivity image of a cubic saline phantom in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT). Physiol. Meas. 24 (2003) 579-589
12. Birgul O., Eyuboglu B.M., and Ider Y.Z. Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns. Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 653-671
13. Ider Y.Z., Onart S., and Lionheart W.R.B. Uniqueness and reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MR.EIT). Physiol. Meas. 24 (2003) 591-604
14. Kim Y.J., Kwon O., Seo J.K., and Woo E.J. Uniqueness and convergence of conductivity image reconstruction in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Inv. Prob. 19 (2003) 1213-1225
15. Kim S.W., Kwon O., Seo J.K., and Yoon J.R. On a nonlinear partial differential equation arising in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J. Math Anal. 34 (2002) 511-526
16. Seo J.K., Yoon J.R., Woo E.J., and Kwon O. Reconstruction of conductivity and current density images using only one component of magnetic field measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50 9 (2003) 1121-1124
17. z algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 3101-3116
18. Seo J.K., Kwon O., Lee B.I., and Woo E.J. Reconstruction of current density distributions in axially symmetric cylindrical sections using one component of magnetic flux density: Computer simulation study. Physiol. Meas. 24 (2003) 565-577
19. Park C., Park E.J., Woo E.J., Kwon O., and Seo J.K. Static conductivity imaging using variational gradient B. algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography. Physiol. Meas. 25 (2004) 257-269
20. z decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT), IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 23 (3) (to appear).
21. S.H. Oh, B.I. Lee, S.Y. Lee, E.J. Woo, M.H. Cho, O. Kwon and J.K. Seo, Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography: Phantom experiments using a 3.0 Tesla MRI system, Magn. Reson. Med. (to appear).
22. Alessandrini G., and Magnanini R. The index of isolated critical points and solutions of elliptic equations in the plane. Ann. Scoula. Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. 19 (1992) 567-589
23. Seo J.K. A uniqueness result on inverse conductivity problem with two measurements. J. Fourier Anal. App. 2 (1996) 515-524
24. Lee B.I., Oh S.H., Woo E.J., Lee S.Y., Cho M.H., Kwon O., Seo J.K., Lee J.Y., and Baek W.S. Three-dimensional forward solver and its performance analysis in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) using recessed electrodes. Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 1971-1986