Inferring protein-protein interactions using interaction network topologies

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks

Volumn 1, Issue , 2005, Pages 161-166

  Paccanarot, Alberto ^a   Trifonov, Valery ^b   Yu, Haiyuan ^a   Gerstein, Mark ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Yale University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PERFORMANCE; TOPOLOGY;

PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE; PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORK; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS;

PROTEINS;

EID: 33745957596     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IJCNN.2005.1555823     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. G D Bader, D Betel, and C W Hogue. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res, 31(1):248-50, 2003.
2. G D Bader and C W Hogue. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat Biotechnol, 20(10):991-7, 2002.
3. A C Gavin et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415(6868):141-7, 2002.
4. Y Ho et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature, 415(6868):180-3, 2002.
5. T Ito et al. Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 97(3):1143-7, 2000.
6. R Jansen et al. Integration of genomic datasets to predict protein complexes in yeast. J Struct Funct Genomics, 2:71-81, 2002.
7. R Jansen et al. A Bayesian networks approach for predicting proteinprotein interactions from genomic data. Science, 302(5644):449-53, 2003.
8. A Kumar and M Snyder. Protein complexes take the bait. Nature, 415(6868):123-4, 2002.
9. S Lafon. Diffitsion maps and geometric harmonics. PhD thesis, Yale University, 2004.
10. E M Marcotte et al. Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. Science, 285(5428):751-3, 1999.
11. H W Mewes et al. MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res, 30(1):31-4, 2002.
12. M Pellegrini et al. Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96(8):4285-8, 1999.
13. G Rigaut et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat Biotechnol, 17(10):1030-2, 1999.
14. S Tsukiyama, M Ide, H Ariyoshi, and I Shirakawa. A new algorithm for generating all the maximal independent sets. SIAM J. Comnput., 6(3):505-17, September 1977.
15. P Uetz et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 403(6770):623-7, 2000.
16. C von Mering et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature, 417(6887):399-403, 2002.
17. I Xenarios et al. DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res, 30(1):303-5, 2002.
18. Y Xia et al. Analyzing cellular biochemistry in terms of molecular networks. Annu Rev Biochem, 73:1051-87, 2004.