A generalization of the van-der-Pol oscillator underlies active signal amplification in Drosophila hearing

European Biophysics Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 511-516

  Stoop, R ^a   Kern, A ^a   Gopfert M C ^b   Smirnov, D A ^c   Dikanev, T V ^d   Bezrucko, B P ^d  

^a Institute of Neuroinformatics Zurich   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE OF RADIO ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS   (Russian Federation)

^d SARATOV STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHLEA; DROSOPHILA; HEARING; NONHUMAN; OSCILLATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOUND; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL CLOCKS; DROSOPHILA; HEARING; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 33745868342     PISSN: 01757571     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00249-006-0059-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boekhoff-Falk G (2005) Hearing in Drosophila: development of Johnston's organ and emerging parallels to vertebrate ear development. Dev Dyn 232:550-558
2. de Boer E (1996) Mechanics of the cochlea: modeling efforts. In: Dallos P, Popper A, Fay R (eds) The Cochlea. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
3. Camalet S, Duke T, Jülicher F, Prost J (2000) Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3183-3188
4. 2+ current-driven nonlinear amplification by the mammalian cochlea in vitro. Nat Neurosci 8:149-155
5. 2+ to mechanoelectrical-transduction channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15321-15326
6. Duke T, Jülicher F (2003) Active traveling wave in the cochlea. Phys Rev Lett 90:158101-1-158101-4
7. Eguíluz VM, Ospeck M, Choe Y, Hudspeth AJ, Magnasco MO (2000) Essential nonlinearities in hearing. Phys Rev Lett 84:5232-5235
8. Gold T (1948) Hearing ii: the physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond B 135:492-498
9. Göpfert MC, Robert D (2001) Active auditory mechanics in mosquitoes. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:333-339
10. Göpfert MC, Robert D (2003) Motion generation by Drosophila mechanosensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5514-5519
11. Göpfert MC, Humpfries ADL, Albert JT, Robert D, Hendrich O (2005) Power gain exhibited by motile neurons in Drosophila ears. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:325-330
12. Jülicher F, Andor D, Duke T (2001) Physical basis of two-tone interference in hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9080-9085
13. Kennedy HJ, Crawford AC, Fettiplace R (2005) Force generation by mammalian hair bundles supports a role in cochlear amplification. Nature 433:880-883
14. Kern A, Stoop R (2003) Essential role of couplings between hearing nonlinearities. Phys Rev Lett 91:128101-1-128101-4
15. Kern A, Steeb W-H, Stoop R (2000) Projective noise cleaning with dynamic neighborhood selection. Int J Mod Phys C 11:125-146
16. Kuramoto Y (2003) Chemical oscillations, waves, and turbulence. Dover Publications, Dover
17. Magnasco MO (2003) A wave traveling over a Hopf instability shapes the cochlear tuning curve. Phys Rev Lett 90:058101-1-058101-4
18. Martin P, Mehta AD, Hudspeth AJ (2000) Negative hair-bundle stiffness betrays a mechanism for mechanical amplification by the hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:12026-12031
19. Robert D, Göpfert MC (2002) Novel schemes for hearing and orientation in insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:715-720
20. Robles L, Ruggero M (2001) Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 81:1305-1352
21. Savitsky A, Golay M JE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least square procedures. Anal Chem 36:1627-1639
22. Sisto R, Moleti A (1999) Modeling otoacoustic emissions by active nonlinear oscillators. J Acoust Soc Am 106:1893-1906
23. Stoop R, Kern A (2004) Two-tone suppression and combination tone generation as computations performed by the Hopf cochlea. Phys Rev Lett 93:268103-1-268103-4