Lysosomal and autophagic reactions as predictive indicators of environmental impact in aquatic animals

Autophagy

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 217-220

  Moore, Michael N ^a   Allen, J Icarus ^a   McVeigh, Allan ^a,b   Shaw, Jenny ^a  

^a PLYMOUTH MARINE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Autophagy; Environmental risk; Health status; Lipofuscin; Lysosomes; Mussels; Pollutants; Prognostic indicators; Reactive oxygen species; Simulation modeling

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; LIPOFUSCIN; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE;

AQUATIC FAUNA; AUTOPHAGY; CELL DAMAGE; CELL FUNCTION; ECOSYSTEM; HEPATOPANCREAS; LYSOSOME; MOLLUSC; MUSSEL; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; POLLUTION; REVIEW; TISSUE INJURY;

ANIMALIA; BIVALVIA; EUKARYOTA; MOLLUSCA; MYTILIDAE;

EID: 33745861702     PISSN: 15548627     EISSN: 15548635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/auto.2663     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Cajaraville MP, Abascal I, Etxeberria M, Marigómez I. Lysosomes as cellular markers of environmental pollution: Time- and dose-dependant responses of the digestive lysosomal system of mussels after petroleum hydrocarbon exposure. Environ Toxicol Water Qual 1995; 10:1-8.
2. Cajaraville MP, Bebianno MJ, Blasco J, Porte C, Sarasquete C, Viarengo A. The use of biomarkers to assess the impact of pollution in coastal environments of the Iberian peninsula: A practical approach. Sci Tot Environ 2000; 247:295-311.
3. Köhler A, Deisemann H, Lauritzen B. Ultrastructural and cytochemical indices of toxic injury in dab liver. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1992; 91:141-53.
4. Marígómez I, Baybay-Villacorta L. Pollutant-specific and general lysosomal responses in digestive cells of mussels exposed to model organic chemicals. Aquatic Toxicol 2003; 64:235-57.
5. Moore MN, Depledge MH, Readman JW, Leonard P. An integrated biomarker-based strategy for ecotoxicological evaluation of risk in environmental management. Mutat Res 2004; 552:247-68.
6. Svendsen C, Spurgeon DJ, Hankard PK, Weeks JM. A review of lysosomal membrane stability measured by neutral red retention: Is it a workable earthworm biomarker. Ecotox Environ Safety 2004; 57:20-9.
7. Moore MN, Allen JI, McVeigh A. Environmental prognostics: An integrated model supporting lysosomal stress responses as predictive biomarkers of animal health status. Mar Environ Res 2006; 61:278-304.
8. Rashid F, Horobin RW, Williams MA. Predicting the behaviour and selectivity of fluorescent probes for lysosomes and related structures by means of structure-activity models. Histochem J 1991; 23:450-9.
9. Viarengo A, Note JA. Mini-review: Mechanisms of heavy metal cation homeostasis in marine invertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol 1993; 104C:355-72.
10. Allen JI, Moore MN. Environmental prognostics: Is the current use of biomarkers appropriate for environmental risk evaluation? Mar Environ Res 2004; 58:227-32.
11. Bayne BL, Moore MN, Widdows J, Livingstone DR, Salkeld PN. Measurement of the responses of individuals to environmental stress and pollution: Studies with bivalve molluscs. Phil Trans R Soc (Lond) 1979; 286B:563-81.
12. Köhler A, Wahl E, Söffker K. Functional and morphological changes of lysosomes as prognostic biomarkers of toxic liver injury in a marine flatfish (Platichthys flesus (L)). Environ Toxicol Chem 2002; 21:2434-44.
13. Winston GW, Adams SM, Benson WH, Gray LE, Matthews HS, Moore MN, Safe S. Biological bases of similarities and differences. In: Di Giulio RT, Benson WB, eds. Interconnections between Human Health and Ecological Integrity. Pensacola, FL: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), 2002:43-65.
14. Bayne BL, Holland DL, Moore MN, Lowe DM, Widdows J. Further studies on the effects of stress in the adult on the eggs of Mytilus edulis. J mar biol Ass UK 1978; 58:825-41.
15. Moore MN. Diet restriction induced autophagy: A protective system against oxidative- and pollutant-stress and cell injury. Mar Environ Res 2004; 58:603-7.
16. Regoli F. Total oxyradical scavenging capacity (TOSC) in polluted and translocated mussels: A predictive biomarker of oxidative stress. Aquatic Toxicol 2000; 50:351-61.
17. Viarengo A, Moore MN, Pertica M, Mancinelli G, Accomando R. A simple procedure for evaluating the protein degradation rate in mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam.) tissues and its application in a study of phenanthrene effects on protein catabolism. Comp Biochem Physiol 1992; 103B:27-32.
18. McVeigh A, Allen JI, Moore MN, Dyke P, Noble D. A carbon and nitrogen flux model of mussel digestive gland epithelial cells and their simulated response to pollutants. Mar Environ Res 2004; 58:821-7.
19. McVeigh A, Moore MN, Allen JI, Dyke P. Lysosomal responses to nutritional and contaminant stress in mussel hepatopancreatic digestive cells: A modelling study. Mar Environ Res 2006; In press.
20. Livingstone DR. Contaminant-stimulated reactive oxygen species production and oxidative damage in aquatic organisms. Mar Pollut Bull 2001; 42:656-66.
21. Brunk UT, Terman A Lipofuscin: Mechanisms of age-related accumulation and influence on cell fonction. Free Rad Biol Med 2002; 33:611-9.
22. Kirchin MA, Moore MN, Dean RT, Winston GW. The role of oxyradicals in intracellular proteolysis and toxicity in mussels. Mar Environ Res 1992; 34:315-20.
23. Moore MN. Lysosomal cytochemistry in marine environmental monitoring. Histochem J 1990;22:187-91.
24. Grune T, Jung T, Merker K, Davies KJA. Decreased proteolysis caused by protein aggregates, inclusion bodies, pkques, lipofuscin, ceroid, and "aggresomes" during oxidative stress, ageing and disease. Internat J Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 36:2519-30.
25. Moore MN. Cytochemical responses of the lysosomal system and NADPH-ferrihemoprotein reductase in molluscs to environmental and experimental exposure to xenobiotics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1988; 46:81-9.
26. Krishnakumar PK, Casillas E, Varanasi U. Effect of environmental contaminants on the health of Mytilus edulis from Puget Sound, Washington, USA. I. Cytochemical measures of lysosomal responses in the digestive cells using automatic image analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1994; 106:249-61.
27. Lüllmann-Rauch R. Drug-induced lysosomal storage disorders. In: Dingle JT, Jacques PJ, Shaw IH, eds. Lysosomes in Applied Biology and Therapeutics, vol 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1979:49-130.
28. Cuervo AM. Autophagy: In sickness and in health. TRENDS Cell Biol 2004; 14:70-7.
29. Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Autophagy as a regulated pathway of cellular degradation. Science 2000; 290:1717-21.
30. Lockshin RA, Zakeri Z. Apoptosis, autophagy, and more. Internat J Biochem Cell Biol 2004; 36:2405-19.
31. Hawkins AJS, Day AJ. The metabolic basis of genetic differences in growth efficiency among marine animals. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 1996; 203:93-115.
32. Moore MN, Lowe DM, Moore SL. Induction of lysosomal destabilisation in marine bivalve molluscs exposed to air. Mar Biol Letters 1979; 1:47-57.
33. Bergamini E, Cavallini G, Donati A, Gori Z. The anti-ageing effects of caloric restriction may involve stimulation of macroautophagy and lysosomal degradation, and can be intensified pharmacologically. Biomed Pharmacother 2003; 57:203-8.
34. Moore MN, Allen JI, Somerfield PJ. Autophagy: Role in surviving environmental stress. Mar Environ Res 2006; In press.
35. Winston GW, Moore MN, Straatsburg I, Kirchin M. Lysosomal stability in Mytilus edulis L.: Potential as a biomarker of oxidative stress related to environmental contamination. Arch Environ Contain Toxicol 1991; 21:401-8.