Value of human-generated perturbations in short-range ensemble forecasts of severe weather

Weather and Forecasting

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 347-363

  Homar, Victor ^a   Stensrud, David J ^a   Levit, Jason J ^b   Bright, David R ^b  

^a NATIONAL SEVERE STORMS LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METEOROLOGICAL PROBLEMS; NUMERICAL METHODS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; STORMS;

ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH MESOSCALE MODEL; HUMAN-GENERATED PERTURBATIONS; NATIONAL SEVERE STORMS LABORATORY; SHORT-RANGE ENSEMBLE FORECASTS;

WEATHER FORECASTING;

ATMOSPHERIC STRUCTURE; ENSEMBLE FORECASTING; NUMERICAL METHOD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; STORM; WEATHER FORECASTING;

EID: 33745857997     PISSN: 08828156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/WAF920.1     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baldwin, M. E., and K. E. Mitchell, 1997: The NCEP hourly multisensor U.S. precipitation analysis for operations and GCIP research. Preprints, 13th Conf. on Hydrology, Long Beach, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 54-55.
2. Baldwin, M. E., J. S. Kain, and M. P. Kay, 2002: Properties of the convection scheme in NCEP's Eta Model that affect forecast sounding interpretation. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 1063-1079.
3. Bluestein, H. B., 1993: Observations and Theory of Weather Systems. Vol. II, Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes, Oxford University Press, 594 pp.
4. Bright, D. R., and S. L. Mullen, 2002: Short-range ensemble forecasts of precipitation during the southwest monsoon. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 1080-1100.
5. Brooks, H., C. A. Doswell III, and M. P. Kay, 2003: Climatological estimates of local daily tornado probability for the United States. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 626-640.
6. Buizza, R., and T. N. Palmer, 1995: The singular vector structure of the atmospheric general circulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1434-1456.
7. Bunkers, M. J., B. A. Klimowski, J. W. Zeitler, R. L. Thompson, and M. L. Weisman, 2000: Predicting supercell motion using a new hodograph technique. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 61-79.
8. Colle, B. A., J. B. Olson, and J. S. Tongue, 2003: Multiseason verification of the MM5. Part I: Comparisons with the Eta Model over the central and eastern United States and impact of MM5 resolution. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 431-457.
9. Davis, C. A., K. W. Manning, R. E. Carbone, S. B. Trier, and J. D. Tuttle, 2003: Coherence of warm-season continental rainfall in numerical weather prediction models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2667-2679.
10. Du, J., and Coauthors, 2004: The NOAA/NWS/NCEP shortrange ensemble forecast (SREF) system: Evaluation of an initial condition vs multi-model physics ensemble approach. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 21.3.
11. Dudhia, J., 1989: Numerical study of convection observed during the Winter Monsoon Experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 3077-3107.
12. Dudhia, J., 1993: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1493-1513.
13. Dudhia, J., 1996: A multi-layer soil temperature model for MM5. Preprints, Sixth PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model User's Workshop, Boulder, CO, 49-50.
14. Ebert, E. E., 2001: Ability of a poor man's ensemble to predict the probability and distribution of precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2461-2480.
15. Ehrendorfer, M., 1994: The Lionville equation and its potential usefulness for the prediction of forecast skills. Part I: Theory. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 703-713.
16. Epstein, E. S., 1969: Stochastic dynamic prediction. Tellus, 21, 739-759.
17. Errico, R. M., 1997: What is an adjoint model? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2577-2591.
18. Evans, R. E., M. S. J. Harrison, R. J. Graham, and K. R. Mylne, 2000: Joint medium-range ensembles from the Met. Office and ECMWF systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3104-3127.
19. Fowle, M. A., and P. J. Roebber, 2003: Short-range (0-48 h) numerical prediction of convective occurrence, mode, and location. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 782-794.
20. Funk, T. W., 1991: Forecasting techniques utilized by the forecast branch of the National Meteorological Center during a major convective rainfall event. Wea. Forecasting, 6, 548-564.
21. Gallus, W. A., Jr., 1999: Eta simulations of three extreme precipitation events: Sensitivity to resolution and convective parameterization. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 405-426.
22. Gelaro, R., R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and E. Klinker, 1998: Sensitivity analysis of forecast errors and the construction of optimal perturbations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 1012-1037.
23. Gilmore, M. S., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2004: Precipitation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a simple microphysics scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2610-2627.
24. Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, 1994: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 117 pp.
25. Hamill, T. M., and S. J. Colucci, 1997: Verification of Eta-RSM short-range ensemble forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 1312-1327.
26. Janjić, Z. I., 1994: The step-mountain eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927-945.
27. Johns, R. H., and C. Doswell III, 1992: Severe local storms forecasting. Wea. Forecasting, 7, 588-612.
28. Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/ detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2784-2802.
29. Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1992: The role of convective "trigger function" in numerical forecasts of mesoscale convective systems. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 49, 93-106.
30. Kalnay, E., 2003: Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability. Cambridge University Press, 342 pp.
31. Kay, M. P., and H. E. Brooks, 2000: Verification of probabilistic severe storm forecasts at the SPC. Preprints, 20th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 285-288.
32. Langland, R. H., R. Gelaro, G. D. Rohaly, and M. Shapiro, 1999a: Targeted observations in FASTEX: Adjoint-based targeting procedures and data impact experiments in IOP17 and IOP18. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 3241-3270.
33. Langland, R. H., and Coauthors, 1999b: The North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX-98): Targeted observations for improved North American weather forecasts. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80, 1363-1384.
34. Leftwich, P. W., Jr., J. T. Schaefer, S. J. Weiss, and M. Kay, 1998: Severe convective storm probabilities for local areas in watches issued by the Storm Prediction Center. Preprints, l9th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 548-551.
35. Legg, T. P., and K. R. Mylne, 2004: Early warnings of severe weather from ensemble forecast information. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 891-906.
36. Leith, C. E., 1974: Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 102, 401-418.
37. McCarthy, D. J., J. T. Schaefer, and M. Kay, 1998: Watch verification at the Storm Prediction Center 1970-1997. Preprints, 19th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Minneapolis, MN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 548-551.
38. Mesinger, F., 1996: Improvements in quantitative precipitation forecasts with the Eta regional model at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction: The 48-km upgrade. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 2637-2649.
39. Olson, D. A., N. W. Junker, and B. Korty, 1995: Evaluation of 33 years of quantitative precipitation forecasting at the NMC. Wea. Forecasting, 10, 498-511.
40. Penland, C., 2003: A stochastic approach to nonlinear dynamics. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, doi:10.1175/BAMS-84-7-Penland.
41. Schneider, R. M., H. E. Brooks, and J. T. Schaefer, 2004: Tornado outbreak day sequences: Historic events and climatology (1875-2003). Preprints, 22d Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, P12.1.
42. Shapiro, M. A., and A. J. Thorpe, 2004: THORPEX International Science Plan., Version III. WMO Tech. Rep. WMO/TD-No. 1246, WWRP/THORPEX No. 2, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 51 pp.
43. Stensrud, D. J., and J. M. Fritsch, 1993: Mesoscale convective systems in weakly forced large-scale environments. Part I: Observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 3326-3344.
44. Stensrud, D. J., and L. Wicker, 2004: On the predictability of mesoscale convective systems. Int. Conf. on Storms, Brisbane, Australia, Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, 62-67.
45. Stensrud, D. J., J.-W. Bao, and T. T. Warner, 2000: Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensemble simulations of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 2077-2107.
46. Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, and J. A. Hart, 2002: Evaluation and interpretation of the supercell composite and significant tornado parameters at the Storm Prediction Center. Preprints, 21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J11-J14.
47. Thompson, R. L., R. Edwards, J. A. Hart, K. L. Elmore, and P. Markowski, 2003: Close proximity soundings within supercell environments obtained from the Rapid Update Cycle. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 1243-1261.
48. Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Ensemble forecasting at NMC: The generation of perturbations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74, 2317-2330.
49. Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1997: Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 3297-3319.
50. Tracton, M. S., and E. Kalnay, 1993: Operational ensemble prediction at the National Meteorological Center: Practical aspects. Wea. Forecasting, 8, 378-398.
51. Wandishin, M. S., S. L. Mullen, D. J. Stensrud, and H. E. Brooks, 2001: Evaluation of a short-range multimodel ensemble system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 129-141.
52. Wang, W., and N. L. Seaman, 1997: A comparison study of convective parameterization schemes in a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 252-278.
53. Weiss, S. J., J. S. Kain, J. J. Levit, M. E. Baldwin, and D. R. Bright, 2004: Examination of several different versions of the WRF model for the prediction of severe convective weather: The SPC/NSSL Spring Program 2004. Preprints, 20th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Hyannis, MA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, 17.1.
54. Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences: An Introduction. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 59, Academic Press, 467 pp.
55. Xu, M., D. J. Stensrud, J.-W. Bao, and T. T. Warner, 2001: Applications of the adjoint technique to short-range ensemble forecasting of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 1395-1418.
56. Zamora, R. J., and Coauthors, 2003: Comparing MM5 radiative fluxes with observations gathered during the 1995 and 1999 Nashville southern oxidant studies. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4050, doi:10.1029/2002JD002122.
57. Zapotocny, T. H., and Coauthors, 2000: A case study of the sensitivity of the Eta Data Assimilation Scheme. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 603-621.
58. Zou, X., F. Vandenberghe, M. Pondeca, and Y.-H. Kuo, 1997: Introduction to adjoint techniques and the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-435+IA, 120 pp.
59. Zou, X., F. W. Huang, and Q. Xiao, 1998: A user's guide to the MM5 adjoint modeling system. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-437+IA, 45 pp.