Bone-implant interface shear modulus and ultimate stress in a transcortical rabbit model of open-pore Ti6Al4V implants

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2123-2132

  Muller M ^a   Hennig, F F ^b   Hothorn, T ^b   Stangl, R ^c  

^a KLINIKUM BAMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c Abteilung für Unfallchirurgie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Osseointegration; Pull out test; Shear modulus; Titanium implants

Indexed keywords

CORUNDUM BLASTING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PULL-OUT TEST; RANDOMIZATION; TITANIUM IMPLANTS;

BIOMECHANICS; CORUNDUM; ELASTIC MODULI; ION IMPLANTATION; SHEAR STRESS; STRESS ANALYSIS; TITANIUM;

BONE;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BONE STRENGTH; BONE STRESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; FEMUR; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; LASER; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; RANDOMIZATION; SHEAR STRESS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; FEMUR; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RABBITS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TITANIUM;

EID: 33745849213     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.036     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials 21 7 (2000) 667-681
2. Arola D.D., Yang D.T., and Stoffel K.A. The apparent volume of interdigitation: a new parameter for evaluating the influence of surface topography on mechanical interlock. Journal of Biomedical Material Research 58 (2001) 519-524
3. Berzins A., Shah B., Weinans H., and Sumner D.R. Nondestructive measurements of implant-bone interface shear modulus and effects of implant geometry in pull-out tests. Journal of Biomedical Material Research 34 3 (1997) 337-340
4. Berzins A., and Sumner D.R. Implant pushout and pullout tests. In: An Y., and Draughn R.A. (Eds). Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant-Interface (2000), CRC Press, Boca Raton 463-476
5. Bobyn J.D., and Miller J.E. Features of biologically fixed devices. In: Simon S.R. (Ed). Orthopaedic Basic Science (1994), American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Chicago
6. Brånemark R., Öhrnell L.O., Skalak R., Carlsson L., and Brånemark P.I. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 16 (1998) 61-69
7. Carter D.R., Beaupre G.S., Giori N.J., and Helms J.A. Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 355 Suppl. (1998) 41-55
8. Chang C.K., Wu J.S., Mao D.L., and Ding C.X. Mechanical and histological evaluations of hydroxyapatite-coated and noncoated Ti6Al4V implants in tibia bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 56 1 (2001) 17-23
9. Cooper L.F. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84 (2000) 522-534
10. Cowin S.C. Mechanics of materials. In: Cowin S.C. (Ed). Bone Mechanics Handbook (2001), CRC Press, Boca Raton 6.1-6.22
11. Gotfredsen K., Wennerberg A., Johansson C., Skovgaard L.T., and Hjorting-Hanen E. Anchorage of TiO2-blasted, HA-coated, and machined implants: an experimental study with rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 29 (1995) 1223-1231
12. Götz H.E., Müller M., Emmel A., Holzwarth U., Erben R.G., and Stangl R. Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 4057-4064
13. Günther H., and Stangl R. Materialverhalten von Implantat-Gewebe-Übergängen. 2.Tagung des DVM-Arbeitskreises Biowerkstoffe, Mainz, 7.-8. April 2000. DVM-Bericht 313 (2000) 83-92
14. Hochberg Y., and Tamhane A.C. Multiple Comparison Procedures (1987), Wiley, New York
15. Hoffler C.E., Moore K.E., Kozloff K., Zysset P.K., Brown M.B., and Goldstein S.A. Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. Bone 26 6 (2000) 603-609
16. Huiskes R., Driel van W.D., Prendergast P.J., and Søballe K. A biomechanical regulatory model for periprosthetic fibrous-tissue differentiation. Journal of Material Science. Materials in Medicine 8 (1997) 785-788
17. Itälä A.I., Ylänen H.O., Ekholm C., Karlsson K.H., and Aro H.T. Pore diameter of more than 100 μm is not a requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (Applied Biomaterials) 58 (2001) 679-683
18. Jasty M., Bragdon C., Burke D., O'Connor D., Lowenstein J., and Harris W.H. In vivo sceletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 79 A (1997) 707-714
19. Jasty M., Bragdon C.R., Schutzer S., Rubash H., Haire T., and Harris W.H. Bone ingrowth into porous coated hip replacements. Quantification by backscattered scanning electron microscopy and image analysis. Scanning Microscopy 4 (1989) 1051-1057
20. Johansson C.B., Han C.H., Wennerberg A., and Albrektsson T. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminium-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 13 (1998) 315-321
21. Kasemo B., and Gold J. Implant surfaces and interface processes. Advances in Dental Research 13 8 (1999) 8-20
22. Keller T.S., and Liebschner M.A. Tensile and compression testing of bone. In: An Y., and Draughn R.A. (Eds). Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant-Interface (2000), CRC Press, Boca Raton 175-205
23. Li J., Liao H., Fartash B., Hermannsson L., and Johnsson T. Surface-dimpled commercially pure titanium implant and bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 18 (1997) 691-696
24. Lin H., Xu H., Zhang X., and de Groot K. Tensile Test of interface between bone and plasma-sprayed HA coating-titanium implant. Applied Biomaterials 43 (1998) 113-122
25. Linde F., and Hvid I. Nondestructive mechanical testing of cancellous bone. In: An Y., and Draughn R.A. (Eds). Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant-Interface (2000), CRC Press, Boca Raton 151-157
26. Masuda T., Yliheikkilä P.K., Felton D.A., and Cooper L.F. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. in vivo studies. International Journal of Maxillofacial Implants 13 (1998) 17-29
27. Mc Koy B.E., An Y.H., and Friedman R.J. Factors affecting the strength of the bone-implant interface. In: An Y., and Draughn R.A. (Eds). Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant-Interface (2000), CRC Press, Boca Raton 439-461
28. Morgan E.F., Yeh O.C., Chang W.C., and Keaveny T.M. Nonlinear behaviour of trabecular bone at small strains. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 123 (2001) 1-9
29. Ozeki K., Yuhta T., Aoki H., Nishimura I., and Fukui Y. Push-out strength of hydroxyapatite coated by sputtering technique in bone. Biomedical Materials Engineering 11 1 (2001) 63-68
30. Pesarin F. Multivariate Permutation Tests: With Applications to Biostatistics (2001), Wiley, Chichester
31. Rho J.Y., Roy II M.E., Tsui T.Y., and Pharr G.M. Elastic properties of microstructural components of human bone tissue as measured by nanoindentation. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 45 (1998) 48-54
32. Rietbergen van B., and Huiskes R. Elastic constants of cancellous bone. In: Cowin S.C. (Ed). Bone Mechanics Handbook (2001), CRC Press, Boca Raton 15.1-15.24
33. Rønold H.J., and Ellingsen J.E. The use of a coin shaped implant for direct in situ measurement of attachment strength for osseointegrating biomaterial surfaces. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 2201-2209
34. Simmons C.A., Shaker A.M., and Pilliar R.M. Differences in osseointegration rate due to implant surface geometry can be explained by local tissue strains. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 19 (2001) 187-194
35. Stangl R., Müller M., and Hennig F.F. Osseointegration und Biomechanik im Knochen-Implantat-Interface von Laser-strukturierten TiAl6V4-Implantaten. Biomaterialien 3 (2003) 196-202
36. Stangl R., Pries A., Loos B., Müller M., and Erben R. Influence of pores created by laser superfinishing on osseointegration of titanium alloy implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 69A (2004) 444-453
37. Stangl R., Rinne B., Kastl S., and Hendrich C. Influence of pore geometry on cp-Ti-implants-a cellculture investigation. European Cells and Materials 2 (2001) 1-9
38. Szmukler-Moncler S., Salama H., Reingewirtz Y., and Dubruille J.H. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 43 (1998) 192-203
39. Thomas K.A., and Cook S.D. An evaluation of variables influencing implant fixation by direct bone apposition. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 19 (1985) 875-901
40. Vercaigne S., Wolke J.G., Naert I., and Jansen J.A. Histomorphometrical and mechanical evaluation of titanium plasma-spray-coated implants placed in the cortical bone of goats. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 41 (1998) 41-48
41. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B., and Morscher E.W. Load transfer and fixation mode of press-fit acetabular sockets. Journal of Arthroplasty 17 7 (2002) 926-935
42. Yan W.Q., Nakamura T., Kobayashi M., Kim H.M., Miyaji F., and Kokubo T. Bonding of chemically treated titanium implants to bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 37 (1997) 267-275