Intellectual property rights, strategy and policy

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 399-415

  Davis, Lee ^a  

^a Department of Innovation and Organizational Economics   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Innovation; Intellectual property rights; Patents; R D incentives; Strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33745840646     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1043859042000188683     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Antonelli, C., (2003). Knowledge, Complementarity and Fungeability: Implications for Regional Strategy. Regional Studies, 37 (6&7): 595–606.
2. Antonelli C., (2004) The Governance of Localized Technological Knowledge and the Evolution of Intellectual Property Rights (to be Published) In Colombatto, E. (ed.) The Elgar Companion to the Economics of Property Rights Elgar (Forthcoming)
3. Arora, A., (1997). Patents, Licensing, and Market Structure in the Chemical Industry. Research Policy, 26: 391–403.
4. Arrow K.J., (1962) Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors Conference No. 13 Princeton NJ Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton University Press
5. Arrow K.J., (1999) Technical Information and Industrial Structure In Carroll, G.R., Teece, D.J. (eds) Firms, Markets and Hierarchies Chap. 8. Oxford Oxford University Press pp. 156–163
6. Arundel, A., (2001). The Relative Effectiveness of Patents and Secrecy for Appropriation. Research Policy, 30: 611–624.
7. Baker, J.B., (2001). Can Antitrust Keep Up?. Brookings Review, Winter: 15–19.
8. Besen, S., and Raskind, L.J., (1991). An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1): 3–27.
9. Bessen J., Hunt R.M., (2003) An Empirical Look at Software Patents Working Paper No. 03-17 Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Available athttp://www.researchoninnovation.org/swpat.pdf
10. Blind, K., and Grupp, H., (1999). Interdependencies between the Science and Technology Infrastructure and Innovation Activities in German Regions: Empirical Findings and Policy Consequences. Research Policy, 28 (5): 451–468.
11. Boone J., (2000) Competitive Pressure: The Effects on Investments in Product and Process Innovation RAND Journal of Economics 31 3 Autumn 549 569
12. Choi S-Y., Stahl D.O., Whinston A.B., (1997) The Economics of Electronic Commerce–The Essential Economics of Doing Business in the Electronic Marketplace Indianapolis IN Macmillan Technical Publishing
13. Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D., (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128–154.
14. Cohen W., Florida R., Randazzese L., Walsh J., (1998) Industry and The Academy: Uneasy Partners in the Cause of Technological Advance In Noll, R. (ed.) Challenges to the Research University Washington, DC Brookings Institution
15. Cohen W.M., Nelson R.R., Walsh J.P., (2000) Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not) National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Nr. 7552. Cambridge MA
16. Coriat, B., and Orsi, F., (2002). Establishing a New Intellectual Property Rights Regime in the United States–Origins, Content and Problems. Research Policy, 31 (8,9): 1491–1507.
17. Davis L.N., (2002a) Is Appropriability a ‘Problem’ for Innovations in Digital Information Goods? LEFIC (Center for Law, Economics and Final Institutions) Working Paper 2002-01, Copenhagen Business School
18. Davis L.N., (2002b) Patents and the Internet LEFIC (Center for Law, Economics and Final Institutions) Working Paper 2002-02 Copenhagen Business School
19. Davis L.N., (2002c) Should We Consider Alternative Incentives for Basic Research? Patents vs. Prizes Paper Presented to the DRUID Summer Conference Elsinore/Copenhagen 6–8 June
20. Davis L.N., Meyer K., (2004) Subsidiary Research and Development and the Local Environment International Business Review 13 3 (forthcoming)
21. De Laat, E.A.A., (1996). Patents or Prizes: Monopolistic R&D and Asymmetric Information. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15: 369–390.
22. Dumont, B., and Holmes, P., (2002). The Scope of Intellectual Property Rights and Their Interface With Competition Law and Policy: Divergent Paths to the Same Goal?. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11 (2): 149–162.
23. Gallini N., Scotchmer S., (2002) Intellectual Property: When is It the Best Incentive System? Economics Working Paper Archives at WUSTL, Law and Economics Series 0201001
24. Granstrand O., (1999) The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property Cheltenham Edward Elgar
25. Granstrand, O., (2000). The Shift Towards Intellectual Capitalism–The Role of Infocom Technologies. Research Policy, 29: 1061–1080.
26. Grindley, P.C., and Teece, D.J., (1997). Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics. California Management Review, 39 (2): 8–41.
27. Hall, B., and Ham Ziedonis, R., (2001). The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32 (2): 101–128.
28. Harabi, N., (1994). Appropriability of Technical Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Research Policy, 24: 981–992.
29. Harris, C., and Vickers, J., (1985). Patent Races and the Persistence of Monopoly. Journal of Industrial Economics, 33 (4): 461–482.
30. Kingston, W., (2001). Innovation Needs Patents Reform. Research Policy, 30: 403–423.
31. Kitch, E., (1977). The Nature and Function of the Patent System. Journal of Law and Economics, 20 (1): 265–290.
32. Kortum, S., and Lerner, J., (1999). What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?. Research Policy, 28: 1–22.
33. Kremer, M., (1998). Patent Buy-Outs: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (4): 1137–1167.
34. Kremer M., (2000) Creating Markets for New Vaccines. Part II: Design Issues National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Nr. 7717. Cambridge MA
35. Landes, W.M., and Posner, R.A., (1987). Trademark Law: An Economic Perspective. The Journal of Law and Economics, 30: 265–309.
36. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G., (1987). Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783–820.
37. Mansfield, E., (1986). Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study. Management Science, 32 (2): 173–181.
38. Maskus K.E., (2000) Globalization and the Economics of Intellectual Property Rights: Dancing the Dual Distortion Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy Washington, DC Institute for International Economics
39. Mazzoleni, R., and Nelson, R.R., (1998). Economic Theories About the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues, 32 (4): 1031–1052.
40. McMillan, G.S., and Hamilton, R.D., (2000). Using Bibliometrics to Measure Firm Knowledge: An Analysis of The U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12 (4): 465–475.
41. McMillan, G.S., Narin, F., and Deeds, D.L., (2000). An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology. Research Policy, 29 (1): 1–8.
42. Merges, R.P., and Nelson, R.R., (1994). On Limiting or Encouraging Rivalry in Technical Progress: The Effect of Patent Scope Decisions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25: 1–24.
43. Miller S., (2003) Europe Says, That Cheese is no Cheddar! Wall Street Journal Eastern ed. New York 13 p. B1.
44. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., Sampat, B.N., and Ziedonis, A.A., (2001). The Growth of Patenting and Licensing By U.S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh–Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy, 30 (1): 99–119.
45. Nelson, R.R., (1959). The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research. Journal of Political Economy, 67: 297–306.
46. Penrose E.T., (1951) The Economics of the International Patent System Westport CT Greenwood Press Publishers 1973. Reprint From The Johns Hopkins Press
47. Polanvyi, M., (1943). Patent Reform. Review of Economic Studies, 11 (1): 61–76.
48. Porter M., (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nations London Macmillan Press
49. Primo Braga C.A., (1995) Trade-Related Intellectual Property Issues: The Uruguay Round Agreement and its Economic Implications In Martin, W., Winters, L.A. (eds), The Uruguay Round and the Developing Economies World Bank Discussion Papers. Washington, DC The World Bank pp. 381–411
50. Rivette, K.G., and Kline, D., (2000a). Discovering New Value In Intellectual Property. Harvard Business Review, January–February: 54–66.
51. Rivette K.G., Kline D., (2000b) Rembrandts in the Attic. Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents Boston MA Harvard Business School Press
52. Roberts, P.W., (1999). Product Innovation, Product-Market Competition and Persistent Profitability in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (7): 655–670.
53. Rosenberg, N., (1990). Why Do Firms Do Basic Research with Their Own Money?. Research Policy, 19 (2): 165–174.
54. Rosenberg, N., and Nelson, R.R., (1994). American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry. Research Policy, 23 (3): 323–348.
55. Sakakibara M., (2001) U.S.-Japan Patent Systems In Burgelman, R.A., Chesbrough, H. (eds), Comparative Studies of Technological Evolution Amsterdam JAI Elsevier Science 207 225
56. Scherer F.M., (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance Chicago IL Rand Mcnally
57. Shapiro C., Varian H.R., (1999) Information Rules Boston MA Harvard Business School Press
58. Shavell, S., and Van Ypersele, T., (2001). Rewards Versus Intellectual Property Rights. The Journal of Law and Economics, Part 1, 44 (2): 525–547.
59. Sobel D., (1995) Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time New York Walker and Co.
60. Teece, D.J., (1986). Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy. Research Policy, 15 (6): 285–305.
61. Teece D.J., (2000) Managing Intellectual Capital Oxford Oxford University Press
62. Thurow, L.C., (1997). Needed: A New System of Intellectual Property Rights. Harvard Business Review, September–October: 95–103.
63. Trainer, T.P., and Simone, J., (2002). The Fight Against Trademark Counterfeiting. The China Business Review, 29 (6): 20–24.
64. Von Hippel, E., (1983). Increasing Innovators’ Returns from Innovation. Research on Technological Innovation, Management and Policy, 1: 35–53.
65. Von Krogh, G., and Von Hippel, E., (2003). Editorial: Special Issue on Open Source Software Development. Research Policy, 32 (7): 1149–1157.
66. Wright, B.D., (1983). The Economics of Invention Incentives: Patents, Prizes, and Research Contracts. American Economic Review, 73: 691–707.