The shift towards intellectual capitalism - The role of infocom technologies

Research Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 1061-1080

  Granstrand, Ove ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010685419     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00070-0     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abramovitz M. Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings. 46:1956;5-23.
2. Adelstein R.P., Peretz S.I. The competition of technologies in markets for ideas: copyright and fair use in evolutionary perspective. International Review of Law and Economics. 5:1985;209-238.
3. Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Arai, H., 1997. IPR Protection in the 21st Century. International Intellectual Property Training Institute 10th Anniversary Memorial Ceremony Speech by Commissioner, Japanese Patent Office, Tokyo.
5. Arora A. Licencing tacit knowledge: intellectual property rights and the market for know-how. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 4:1995;41-59.
6. Arora A. Contracting for tacit knowledge: the provision of technical services in technology licensing contracts. Journal of Development Economics. 50:1996;233-256.
7. Arrow, K.J., 1962. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In National Bureau of Economic Research: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 609-626.
8. Arthur, B., 1988. Competing technologies: an overview. In: Dosi et al. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 590-607.
9. Athreye S.S. On markets in knowledge. Journal of Management and Governance. 1:1998;231-253.
10. Baumol, W.J., Blackman, S.A.B., Wolff, E.N., 1998. Is the United States becoming an information economy? In: Cortada, J.W., (Ed.), Rise of the Knowledge Worker, Chap. 10. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1998, pp. 151-164.
11. Becker, G.S., 1993. Human Capital. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, 3rd edn. Univ. of Chicago Press (1st edn. published 1964).
12. Bohlin, E., 1995. Economics and Management of Investments: An International Investigation of New Technology Decision-Making in Telecommunications. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
13. Bureau of Economic Analysis Survey of Current Business. 72(9):1994;111-114.
14. Castells, M., 1998. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Vol. III: End of Millennium. Blackwell, Oxford.
15. Caves R., Crookell H., Killing P. The imperfect market for technology licenses. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 45:1983;249-267.
16. Dasgupta P., David P.A. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy. 23:1994;487-521.
17. David P.A. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review. 75(2):1985;332-337.
18. David, P.A., 1993. Intellectual Property Institutions and the Panda's Thumb: Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets in Economic Theory and History, In: Wallerstein et al. (Eds.), Chap. 2, pp. 19-61.
19. Denison, E.F., 1985. Trends in American Economic Growth. Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
20. Drucker, P.F., 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. HarperBusiness.
21. Dunning, J.H., 1988. Multinationals, Technology and Competitiveness. Unwin-Hyman, London.
22. EC, 1997. Building the European Information Society for Us All. Office for Official Publications of the EC, Luxembourg.
23. Edvinsson, L., Malone, M.S., 1997. Intellectual Capital. Harper Collins, New York.
24. European Commission, 1998. Impact on competition and scale effects - intangible investments. The Single Market Review, Subseries V, 2.
25. Foray, D., 1994. Production and distribution of knowledge in the new systems of innovation: the role of intellectual property rights. Paper Prepared for the Conference: Intellectual Property Rights and Global Competition. Science Center for Social Research, Berlin, April, pp. 21-22.
26. Forbes, 1997. The World's Richest People 1997. Database, .
27. Frank, R.H., Cook, P.J., 1995. The Winner-Take-All Society. Martin Kessler Books, Free Press, New York, NY.
28. Freeman, C., Perez, C., 1988. Structural Crises of Adjustment. Business Cycles and Investment Behavior, In: Dosi et al. (Eds.), Chap. 3, 1988 pp. 38-66.
29. Freeman, C., Clark, J., Soete, L., 1982. Unemployment and Technical Innovation. A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development. Frances Pinter Publishers, London.
30. Gardner, H.S., 1988. Comparative Economic Systems. The Dryden Press, Chicago.
31. Gerlach, M., 1992. Alliance Capitalism. The Social Organization of Japanese Business. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
32. Geroski, P., 1995. Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability. In: Stoneman, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Chap. 4. Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 90-131.
33. Goldstein P. Copyright and its substitutes. Wisconsin Law Review. 5:1997;865-871.
34. Graham G.S. The ascendancy of the sailing ship 1850-85. Economic History Review. IX(1):1956;74-88.
35. Granstrand O. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy. 27(6):1998;465-489.
36. Granstrand, O., 1999. The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
37. Granstrand O., Sjölander S. The acquisition of technology and small firms by large firms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 13:1990;367-386.
38. Granstrand O., Bohlin E., Oskarsson C., Sjöberg N. External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations. R&D Management. 22(2):1992;1-35.
39. Granstrand O., Patel P., Pavitt K. Multi-technology corporations: why they have 'distributed' rather than 'distinctive core' competencies. California Management Review. 39(4):1997;8-25.
40. Griliches, Z., 1984. R&D, Patents, and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
41. Griliches Z. Productivity, R&D and the data constraint. American Economic Review. 84(1):1994;1-23.
42. Griliches Z. The discovery of the residual: a historical note. Journal of Economic Literature. 34:1996;1324-1330.
43. Hall, B.H., 1993. The value of intangible corporate assets: an empirical study of the components of Tobin's Q. Working Paper No. 93-207. Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley.
44. Howitt, P., 1998. On some problems in measuring knowledge-based growth. In: Neef, D. (Ed.), The Knowledge Economy, Chap. 8. Butterworth-Heinemannn, Boston, pp. 97-117.
45. ICC, 1997. Countering Counterfeiting. A Guide to Protecting and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights. ICC (International Chamber of Commerce) Publishing, Paris.
46. Jantsch, E., 1967. Technological Forecasting in Perspective. OECD, Paris.
47. Johnson C. Comparative capitalism: the Japanese difference. California Management Review. 35(4):1993;51-67.
48. Jones C.I. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy. 103(4):1995;759-784.
49. Jones, C.I., 1998. Sources of US Economic Growth in a World of Ideas. Mimeo, Dept. of Economics, Stanford University.
50. JPO, USPTO, EPO, 1996. Trilateral Statistics Report 1996, http://www.jpo-miti.go.jp/.
51. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 1996. The Balanced Scorecard. Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
52. Kendrick J.W. Total capital and economic growth. American Economic Journal. 22(1):1994;1-18.
53. Kodama, F., 1995. Emerging Patterns of Innovation. Sources of Japan's Technological Edge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
54. Kortum, S., Lerner, J., 1997. Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting? Mimeo, NBER, Cambridge, MA.
55. Lewellen W.G., Badrinath S.G. On the measurement of Tobin's Q. Journal of Financial Economics. 44:1997;177-182.
56. Liebowitz S.J., Margolis S.E. The fable of the keys. The Journal of Law and Economics. XXXIII(1):1990;1-25.
57. Lindholm, Å., 1994. The Economics of Technology-Related Ownership Changes. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
58. Mansfield E. How rapidly does new technology leak out? Journal of Industrial Economics. 34:1985;217-223.
59. Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Management Science. 32(2):1986;173-181.
60. Merges, R.P., 1995. Contemporary pressure points in patent law and litigation: economic perspectives. Paper presented at the AEA Meeting, San Francisco, Jan. 1996.
61. Nelson, R.R., 1996. The Sources of Economic Growth. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
62. North, D.C., 1996. Economics and Cognitive Science ewp-eh/9612002.
63. Patel, P., Pavitt, K., 1995. Technological competencies in the world's largest firms: characteristics, constraints and scope for managerial choice. Working Paper 95-66. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
64. Reichman J.H., Samuelson P. Intellectual property rights in data? Vanderbilt Law Review. 50(1):1997;52-166.
65. Romer, D., 1996. Advanced Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill, New York.
66. Rosenberg N. Economic experiments. Industrial and Corporate Change. 1:1992;181-203.
67. Rosenberg, N., 1994. Exploring the Black Box. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
68. Rosenberg, N., Birdzell Jr., L.E., 1986. How the West Grew Rich. The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World. Basic Books.
69. Rosenberg N., Nelson R.R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy. 23:1994;323-348.
70. Scherer, F.M., 1998. The size distribution of profits from innovation. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique (49/50).
71. Schumpeter, J.A., 1976. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Allen & Unwin, London.
72. Solow R.M. Technical change and the aggregate production function. Review of Economics and Statistics. 39:1957;312-320.
73. Stewart, T.A., 1997. Intellectual Capital. Doubleday, New York.
74. Thurow, L.C., 1996. The Future of Capitalism: How Today's Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow's World. William Morrow, New York.
75. Thurow L.C. Needed: a new system of intellectual property rights. Harvard Business Review. 1997:1997;95-103.
76. TNO, 1995. Immaterial Investments as an Innovative Factor. Report No. STB/95/029. TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies, Apeldorn.
77. Tobin J. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. 1:1969;15-29.
78. Utterback, J.M., 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
79. Wallerstein, M., Mogee, M., Schoen, R. (Eds.), 1993. Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
80. Warshofsky, F., 1994. Patent Wars. Wiley, Chichester.
81. Williamson, O.E., 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press, New York.