Air Traffic Management accident risk. Part 2: Repairing the deficiencies of ESARR4

Safety Science

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 629-655

  Brooker, Peter ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Air Traffic Management; Formal safety assessment; Modelling; Probability; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

HAZARDS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; FORMAL SAFETY ASSESSMENT; MODELLING; RISK ANALYSIS;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL;

ACCIDENT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHANGE MANAGEMENT; EUROCONTROL SAFETY REGULATORY REQUIREMENT NUMBER 4; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TIME; TRAFFIC;

EID: 33745839836     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ARIBA, 1999. WP6 Final Report Part II: Safety Cases for a new ATM operation. http://www.nlr.nl/public/hosted-sites/ariba/rapport6/part2/title.htm.
2. BFU (German Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Investigation), 2004. Investigation Report 'Überlingen Mid-air collision'. AX001-1-2/02. http://www.bfu-web.de/berichte/02_ax001efr.pdf.
3. Brooker P. Future Air Traffic Management: Quantitative en route safety assessment. Part 2-New approaches. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 55 3 (2002) 363-379
4. Brooker P. The risk of mid-air collision to commercial air transport aircraft receiving a radar advisory service in class F/G airspace. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 57 (2003) 277-289
5. Brooker P. Airborne separation assurance systems: Towards a work programme to prove safety. Safety Science 42 8 (2004) 723-754
6. Brooker P. Consistent and up-to-date aviation safety targets. Aeronautical Journal July (2004) 345-356
7. Brooker, P., 2004c. Delivering safety in the context of environmental restrictions: Aviation expert and research review. CAA Paper 2004/08. CAA, London.
8. Brooker P. Why the Eurocontrol Safety Regulation Commission policy on safety nets and risk assessment is wrong. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 57 2 (2004) 231-243
9. Brooker P. Reducing mid-air collision risk in controlled airspace: Lessons from hazardous incidents. Safety Science 43 9 (2005) 715-738
10. Brooker P. Airborne collision avoidance systems and air traffic management safety. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 58 1 (2005) 1-16
11. Brooker P. STCA, TCAS, airproxes and collision risk. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 58 3 (2005) 389-404
12. Brooker, P., in press. Air traffic management accident risk. Part 1: The limits of realistic modelling. Safety Science, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2005.11.004.
13. Brooker, P., Ingham, T., 1977. Target levels of safety for controlled airspace. CAA Paper 77002. CAA, London.
14. Brooker P., and White F.A. Minimum navigation performance specification and other separation variables in the North Atlantic area. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 32 3 (1979) 357-374
15. Davies, E.H., Sharpe, A.G., 1993. Review of the target level of safety for NAT MNPS airspace. CS Report 9301, NATS, London.
16. ECAC, 2005. ECAC RVSM website. http://www.ecacnav.com/rvsm/safety.htm.
17. Eurocontrol, 2003. Review of ACAS RA Downlink: An assessment of the technical feasibility and operational usefulness of providing ACAS RA awareness on CWP. http://www.eurocontrol.int/ra-downlink/Library/Review%20of%20ACAS%20RA%20Downlink%20ver%2010.pdf.
18. Eurocontrol SRC, 2001. Risk assessment and mitigation in ATM, Eurocontrol safety regulatory requirement ESARR4, Edition 1.0., Eurocontrol, Safety Regulation Commission, Brussels. http://www.eurocontrol.int/src/gallery/content/public/documents/deliverables/esarr4v1.pdf.
19. Eurocontrol SRC, 2003. Explanatory Material on ESARR4 Requirements. EAM 4/GUI 1. Edition 1, Eurocontrol, Brussels. http://www.eurocontrol.int/src/gallery/content/public/documents/deliverables/esarr4_awareness_package/eam4gui1_e10_ri_no_signatures.pdf.
20. FAA/Eurocontrol, 1998. A concept paper for separation safety modeling. An FAA/EUROCONTROL Cooperative Effort on Air Traffic Modeling for Separation Standards. http://www.faa.gov/asd/ia-or/pdf/cpcomplete.pdf.
21. Harrison D., and Moek G. European studies to investigate the feasibility of using 1000 ft vertical separation minima above FL 290: Part II-Precision data analysis and collision risk assessment. Journal of the Institute of Navigation 45 (1992) 91-106
22. 6 Barrier. Aeronautical Journal August (1992) 260-270
23. Hunter, R.D., 1980. The development of obstacle clearance criteria for ILS operations at civil airports. CAA Paper 80009, CAA.
24. ICAO, 1998. Manual on airspace planning methodology for the determination of separation minima. ICAO Doc 9689-AN/953.
25. JAA, 2003. Advisory joint material relating to JAR 25 large aeroplanes, AMJ 25.1309, Change 16, Joint Airworthiness Authorities, 2003.
26. Luxhøj, J.T., 2003. Probabilistic causal analysis for system safety risk assessments in commercial air transport. In: Second Workshop on the Investigation and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents, IRIA 2003. http://shemesh.larc.nasa.gov/iria03/p02-luxhoj.pdf.
27. Moray N. Dougherty's dilemma and the one-sidedness of Human Reliability Analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 29 (1990) 337-344
28. Profit R. Systematic Safety Management in the Air Traffic Services (1995), Euromoney, London
29. Rasmussen J. Human error and the problem of causality in analysis of accidents. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 327 (1990) 449-462
30. Reason J. Human Error (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
31. RGCSP (Review of the General Concept of Separation Panel), 1995. RGCSP Working Group a Meeting: Summary of Discussions and Conclusions, ICAO.
32. Sharpe, A.G., 1991. Application of the 5 nm radar standard separation at ranges up to 160 nm from Claxby, Debden and Pease Pottage SSRs. CAA Paper 91013, Civil Aviation Authority, London.
33. Strigini, L., 1996. Engineering judgement in reliability and safety and its limits: what can we learn from research in psychology? SHIP project Technical Report T/030. http://www.csr.city.ac.uk/people/lorenzo.strigini/ls.papers/ExpJudgeReport/ExpJudgeReport96.pdf.
34. van Es, G.W.H., 2003. Review of air traffic management-related accidents worldwide: 1980-2001. In: FSF European Aviation Safety Seminar, Geneva. http://www.nlr.nl/public/en/index.php?url=http://www.nlr.nl/public/publications/tpsummaries/2003/2003-376-dcs.php.
35. Villiers, J., 1968. Perspectives pour le contröle de la circulation aérienne dans les phases avancées d'automatisation-la méthode des filtres (Perspectives for air traffic control for advanced phases of automation-the method of layers). Navigation no. 61, January (in French).